green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
15.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1981 ·
…any party aggrieved by the decision of the state agency has a right to appeal to a state court of competent jurisdiction or to a district court of the united states. 1415(e)(2)
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1981 ·
…any party aggrieved by the decision of the state agency has a right to appeal to a state court of competent jurisdiction or to a district court of the united states. (20 u.s.c.) 1415(e)(2)
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1983 ·
…the extinguishment of all indian title was meant to be a matter of federal concern
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. Town of Southbury
djefenses based upon state adverse possession laws and state statutes of limitation have been consistently rejected
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida
the extinguishment of all indian title was meant to be a matter of federal concern
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
The Oneida Indian Nation of New York State, A/K/A the Oneida Indian Nation of New York, A/K/A the Oneida Indians of New York the Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin, A/K/A the Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, Inc. And the Oneida of the Thames Band Council, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. The County of Oneida, New York and the County of Madison, New York, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. State of New York, Third Party
the extinguishment of all indian title was meant to be a matter of federal concern
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tokarcik v. Forest Hills School District
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
any party aggrieved by the decision of the state agency has a right to appeal to a state court of competent jurisdiction or to a district court of the united states. (20 u.s.c.) 1415(e)(2)
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tokarcik v. Forest Hills School District
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
any party aggrieved by the decision of the state agency has a right to appeal to a state court of competent jurisdiction or to a district court of the united states. 1415(e)(2)
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Conn. Ex Rel. Blumenthal v. Babbitt
See Mohegan Tribe v. State of Connecticut, 483 F.Supp. 597 (D.Conn.) (denying State’s motion to dismiss on the basis that the Nonintercourse Act allegedly applied only to western areas of the United States, and not to the earlier settled eastern states), aff'd, 638 F.2d 612 (2nd Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3124 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians, Aurelilus H. Piper, Jr., Moonface Bear, Ethel Sherman Piper Baldwin Peters v. Lowell P. Weicker, Jr., Governor of Connecticut Joseph Ganim, Mayor, City of Bridgeport Hoffman Fuel Co., Hoffman Fuel Co., Counter-Claimants v. Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians Aurelilus H. Piper, Jr. Moonface Bear Ethel Sherman Piper Baldwin Peters and Lowell P. Weicker, Jr., Governor of Connecticut, Counter-Defendants
See Act of March 1, 1793, ch. 19, Sec. 8, 1 Stat. 329 , 330-31; Act of May 19, 1796, ch. 30, Sec. 12, 1 Stat. 469 , 472; Act of March 3, 1799, ch. 46, Sec. 12, 1 Stat. 743 , 746; Act of March 30, 1802, ch. 13, Sec. 12, 2 Stat. 139 , 143; Act of June 30, 1834, ch. 161, Sec. 12, 4 Stat. 729 , 730-31; see generally Mohegan Tribe v. Connecticut, 638 F.2d 612, 617-18 (2d Cir.1980) (providing history of the Nonintercourse Act), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3124 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. Weicker
See Act of March 1, 1793, ch. 19, § 8, 1 Stat. 329 , 330-31; Act of May 19,1796, ch. 30, § 12, 1 Stat. 469 , 472; Act of March 3, 1799, ch. 46, § 12, 1 Stat. 743 , 746; Act of March 30, 1802, ch. 13, § 12, 2 Stat. 139 , 143; Act of June 30, 1834, ch. 161, § 12, 4 Stat. 729 , 730-31; see generally Mohegan Tribe v. Connecticut, 638 F.2d 612, 617-18 (2d Cir.1980) (providing history of the Nonintercourse Act), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3124 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oberti Ex Rel. Oberti v. Board of Education
(2×)
See Battle v. Pennsylvania, 629 F.2d 269, 275 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied sub nom., Scanlon v. Battle, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981) (”[w]here basic self-help and social skills such as toilet training ... and communication are lacking, formal education begins at that point”). 19 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Alaska
(2×)
See Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tully, 639 F.2d 912, 916-17 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981); Mobil Oil Corp. v. Dubno, 639 F.2d 919, 921 (2d Cir), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3122 , 69 L.Ed.2d 980 (1981). 3 Consequently, we decline to consider that issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
Polk, Ronald v. Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit 16
(2×)
Accord Rowley, 458 U.S. at 209 , 102 S.Ct. at 3052 . 26 In Battle v. Pennsylvania, 629 F.2d 269 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981), this court held that Pennsylvania's inflexible policy of limiting special education to 180 days per year, regardless of individual need, violated the EHA.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bushey
See Mohegan Tribe v. Connecticut, 638 F.2d 612, 620-21 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3124 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard Lugar v. Texaco, Inc.
(2×)
See Battle v. Pennsylvania, 629 F.2d 269 , 271 n. 1 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
ANDREW H. BY IRENE H. v. Ambach
(2×)
See Battle v. Pennsylvania, 629 F.2d 269, 278 (3d Cir.1980) (“We believe that these hard decisions of resource allocation, like the determinations of educational policy are best left to the states, in the first instance.”), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981).
examined
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Wolff & Munier, Inc.
(4×)
See Battle v. Pennsylvania, 629 F.2d 269 , 271 n. 1 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981); Brown & Sielaff, 474 F.2d 826, 828 (3d Cir.1973); Fed.R.App.P. 28(a) (appellant’s brief shall state issues presented for review); 9 J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jean Fallis v. Gordon M. Ambach
(2×)
See Battle v. Commonwealth Pennsylvania, 629 F.2d 269, 278 (3d Cir.1980) (“[Tjhese hard decisions of resource allocation, like the determinations of educational policy are best left to the states, in the first instance.”), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981); cf. Board of Education v. Rowley, ___ U.S. ___, 102 S.Ct. 3034, 3052 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982) (“[Ojnce a court determines that the requirements of the Act have been met, questions of methodology are for resolution by the States.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Timothy Tilton, by His Guardian and Next Friend, Mona Richards v. Jefferson County Board of Education
(2×)
See generally, Battle v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 629 F.2d 269 (3rd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981) (inflexible 180-day rule precludes the proper formulation of appropriate education).
examined
Cited "see"
Scallop Corp. v. Tully
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tully, 639 F.2d 912, 915 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981); Whelan v. Brinegar, 538 F.2d 924, 926 (2d Cir.1976) (per curiam); M.
examined
Cited "see"
Scallop Corporation v. Tully
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tully, 639 F.2d 912, 915 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981); Whelan v. Brinegar, 538 F.2d 924, 926 (2d Cir.1976) (per curiam); M.
cited
Cited "see"
Oneida Indian Nation v. New York
See Mohegan Tribe v. Connecticut, 638 F.2d 612, 616 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3124 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Oneida Indian Nation of New York, Cross v. State of New York, Counties of Broome, Chenango, Cortland, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Madison, Oswego, Oneida, Onondaga, St. Lawrence and Tioga, Individually and as Class Representatives, Cross-Appellants. Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin and Oneida of the Thames Band, Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellees v. State of New York, Counties of Broome, Chenango, Cortland, Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Madison, Oneida, Onondaga, Oswego, St. Lawrence and Tioga, New York, and Valentine Ryan, New York Electric & Gas Corp., St. Regis Paper Co., and Georgia Pacific Corp., Individually and as Class Representatives, Cross-Appellants
See Mohegan Tribe v. Connecticut, 638 F.2d 612, 616 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3124 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jose P. v. Gordon M. Ambach, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, Frank J. MacChiarola Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. United Cerebral Palsy of N.Y.C., Inc. v. Board of Education, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Gordon M. Ambach, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Dyrcia S. v. Board of Education, New York State Education Department
(2×)
See Riley v. Ambach, 668 F.2d 635, 641 (2d Cir. 1981) (acknowledging that exhaustion is not required where it would be futile or remedies inadequate) (citing Armstrong v. Kline, 476 F.Supp. 583, 601-02 (E.D.Pa.1979) (holding failure to exhaust state remedies excused by futility) remanded on other grounds, Battle v. Pennsylvania, 629 F.2d 269 (3d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jose P. v. Ambach
(2×)
See Riley v. Ambach, 668 F.2d 635, 641 (2d Cir. 1981) (acknowledging that exhaustion is not required where it would be futile or remedies inadequate) (citing Armstrong v. Kline, 476 F.Supp. 583, 601-02 (E.D.Pa.1979) (holding failure to exhaust state remedies excused by futility) remanded on other grounds, Battle v. Pennsylvania, 629 F.2d 269 (3d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indian Country, U.S.A., Inc. v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission
See 25 U.S.C. § 177 (1982); County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State, 470 U.S. 226 , 105 S.Ct. 1245, 1250 , 84 L.Ed.2d 169 (1985); see also Mohegan Tribe v. Connecticut, 638 F.2d 612, 621 (2d Cir.1980), cert, denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3124 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indian Country v. State of Oklahoma
Sec. 177 (1982); County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State, 470 U.S. 226 , 105 S.Ct. 1245, 1250 , 84 L.Ed.2d 169 (1985); see also Mohegan Tribe v. Connecticut, 638 F.2d 612, 621 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3124 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Schwartz v. Prairie Producing Co., Inc.
(4×)
While it has been held that, at least in some circumstances, a gas well is a “mine,” Southland Royalty Co. v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., 378 S.W.2d 50, 56 (Tex.1964); see also Amoco Production Co. v. Guild Trust, 636 F.2d 261 (10th Cir.1980) (applying Wyoming law), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981), these cases did not involve the production of sulphur from hydrogen sulfide gas.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harvey & Harvey, Inc. v. Delaware Solid Waste Authority
(2×)
See also Mobil Oil Corp. v. Tally, 639 F.2d 912, 917-18 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981) (Tax Injunction Act did not prohibit entertaining suit attacking anti-passthrough provision of statute imposing 2% tax on gross receipts of oil companies doing business in New York since the provision was not an exercise of the state’s taxing powers to assess, levy, or collect taxes but rather an exercise of the state’s police powers to control prices); Mobil Oil Corp. v. Dubno, 639 F.2d 919, 922 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 967 , 101 S.Ct. 312…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roncker v. Walter
(2×)
See, e.g., Battle v. Commonwealth of Pa., 629 F.2d 269 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981); Garrity v. Gallen, 522 F.Supp. 171 (D.N.H.1981); Green v. Johnson, 513 F.Supp. 965 (D.Mass.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roncker ex rel. Roncker v. Walter
(2×)
See, e.g., Battle v. Commonwealth of Pa., 629 F.2d 269 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3123 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 (1981); Garrity v. Gallen, 522 F.Supp. 171 (D.N.H.1981); Green v. Johnson, 513 F.Supp. 965 (D.Mass.1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mashpee Tribe v. Watt
Compare, Mohegan, 638 F.2d at 626 , and Mohegan, 452 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 3124 , 69 L.Ed.2d 981 , Rehnquist, J. (dissenting). 11 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Scanlon, Secretary of Education of Pennsylvania
v.
Battle
v.
Battle
No. 80-827.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1981.
Cited by 102 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of National School Boards Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Justice White would grant certiorari.