green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gerlaugh
See the discussion of State v. (Alonzo) Mata, 125 Ariz. 243 , 609 P.2d 58 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 921 , 101 S.Ct. 322 , 66 L.Ed.2d 150 (1980), in State v. Gillies, supra, 135 Ariz. at 516, 662 P.2d at 1023 , which contains information not found in the original opinion (defendant was an immature 18-year-old with no prior criminal record who did not commit the actual murder but was only an accomplice to the murder).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion Number
Ringel, *West Page 1089 Searches Seizures, Arrests and Confessions § 14.3(b)(1) and (2); see also United States v. Raub, 637 F.2d 1205 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 322 , 66 L.Ed.2d 150 (1980) (commercial fishing); Tallman v. Dept. of Natural Resources, 421 Mich. 585 , 365 N.W.2d 724 (1984) (commercial fishing); Oregon v. Westside Fish Co., 31 Or.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion Number
Ringel, *West Page 1089 Searches Seizures, Arrests and Confessions § 14.3(b)(1) and (2); see also United States v. Raub, 637 F.2d 1205 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 322 , 66 L.Ed.2d 150 (1980) (commercial fishing); Tallman v. Dept. of Natural Resources, 421 Mich. 585 , 365 N.W.2d 724 (1984) (commercial fishing); Oregon v. Westside Fish Co., 31 Or.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Orantez
Romley v. Superior Court, 172 Ariz. 232, 236 , 836 P.2d 445, 449 (App.1992) (“[I]f a trial court excludes essential evidence, thereby precluding a defendant from presenting a theory of defense, the trial court’s decision results in a denial of defendant’s right to due process that is not harmless.”); see also State v. Mata, 125 Ariz. 243, 244 , 609 P.2d 58, 59 (upholding trial court’s rejection of proffered testimony of victim’s statement that she had previously prostituted herself with murder defendant for heroin in part because statement was made while victim was high on heroin a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries
Ringel, *1089 Searches & Seizures, Arrests and Confessions § 14.3(b)(1) and (2); see also United States v. Raub, 637 F.2d 1205 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 922 , 101 S.Ct. 322 , 66 L.Ed.2d 150 (1980) (commercial fishing); Tallman v. Dept. of Natural Resources, 421 Mich. 585 , 365 N.W.2d 724 (1984) (commercial fishing); Oregon v. Westside Fish Co., 31 Or.App. 299 , 570 P.2d 401 (1977) (wholesale fish dealer); and, South Dakota v. Halverson, 277 N.W.2d 723 (N.D.1979) (hunting).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mata
v.
Arizona
v.
Arizona
No. 80-5069.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1980.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.