Whig Party of Alabama v. Siegelman, 449 U.S. 916 (1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Whig Party of Alabama v. Siegelman, 449 U.S. 916 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
56 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Mata (ariz, 1996-05-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Mata (2×)
Ariz. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See 125 Ariz. 233, 236, 242 , 609 P.2d 48, 51, 57 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 338 , 66 L.Ed.2d 161 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" Mata v. Ricketts
9th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mata, 125 Ariz. 233 , 609 P.2d 48 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 338 , 66 L.Ed.2d 161 (1980). 16 The principal question before us is whether a new Supreme Court decision announced after the exhaustion of state remedies and after the conclusion of proceedings before the district court creates a right to federal constitutional relief. 17 During the trial, Mata's brother, Alonzo, was Luis' codefendant.
cited Cited "see" Mata v. Ricketts
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mata, 125 Ariz. 233 , 609 P.2d 48 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 338 , 66 L.Ed.2d 161 (1980).
discussed Cited "see" Mata v. Ricketts
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mata, 125 Ariz. 233 , 609 P.2d 48 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 338 , 66 L.Ed.2d 161 (1980). 2 The principal question before us is whether a new Supreme Court decision announced after the exhaustion of state remedies and after the conclusion of proceedings before the district court creates a right to federal constitutional relief. 3 During the trial, Mata's brother, Alonzo, was Luis' codefendant.
cited Cited "see" Mata v. Ricketts
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mata, 125 Ariz. 233 , 609 P.2d 48 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 338 , 66 L.Ed.2d 161 (1980).
examined Cited "see" State v. Osborn (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Idaho · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mata, 125 Ariz. 233 , 609 P.2d 48, 57 (1980) cert. den. 449 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 338 , 66 L.Ed.2d 161 (1980) (where the trial court apparently made the specific finding that mitigating circumstances were absent).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Clabourne
Ariz. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Mata, 125 Ariz. 233 , 609 P.2d 48 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 338 , 66 L.Ed.2d 161 (1980); State v. Arnett, 125 Ariz. 201 , 608 P.2d 778 (1980); State v. Evans, supra. We do not find the sentence either excessive or disproportionate.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whig Party of Alabama
v.
Siegelman, Secretary of State of Alabama
No. A-333.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1980.
449 U.S. 916
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Application for injunction and other relief, presented to Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court, denied.