green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. Smith
See Ambook Enters., Inc. v. Time, Inc., 612 F.2d 604 , 620 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 448 U.S. 914 , 101 S.Ct. 35 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1179 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rios v. Marshall
See Ambook Enterprises v. Time, Inc., 612 F.2d 604, 608 (2d Cir.1979), cert. dismissed, 448 U.S. 914 , 101 S.Ct. 35 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1179 (1980); LaMar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Co., 489 F.2d 461 (9th Cir.1973); Vulcan Society v. Fire Department of White Plains, 82 F.R.D. 379, 398 (S.D.N.Y.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Gianna Enterprises v. Miss World (Jersey) Ltd.
See Ambook Enterprises v. Time, Inc., 612 F.2d 604, 608 (2d Cir.1979), cert. dismissed, 448 U.S. 914 , 101 S.Ct. 35 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1179 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jack Weit v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago
(2×)
See Ambook Enterprises v. Time, Inc., 612 F.2d 604, 613 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. dismissed, --- U.S ----, 101 S.Ct. 35 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1179 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Empire State Pharmaceutical Society, Inc. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Greater New York
See Freeman v. Chicago Title and Trust Co., 505 F.2d 527 (7th Cir.1974) (insurance); see, e.g., Ambook Enter. v. Time Inc., 612 F.2d 604 , 609-10 (2d Cir.1979), cert. dismissed, 448 U.S. 914 , 101 S.Ct. 35 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1179 (1980) (newspaper advertising); Gordon v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc., 498 F.2d 1303 , 1305 n. 7 (2d Cir.1974), aff'd 422 U.S. 659 , 95 S.Ct. 2598 , 45 L.Ed.2d 463 (1975) (brokerage services); Rodman v. Haines, 1976-2 Trade Cas.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wood, dba National Photo Services
v.
Chace Company Advertising, Inc.
v.
Chace Company Advertising, Inc.
No. A-1154.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 22, 1980.
Published
Application for recall and stay of the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, addressed to Mr. Justice Brennan and referred to the Court, denied.