green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1993 ·
…a co-defendant has no standing to appeal from a consent decree that binds him in no way and does not affect his legal rights.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Zupnick v. Fogel
a co-defendant has no standing to appeal from a consent decree that binds him in no way and does not affect his legal rights.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Koefoot v. American College of Surgeons
(2×)
national sanitation
discussed
Cited "see"
DM Research, Inc. v. College of American Pathologists
(2×)
See Eliason Corp. v. National Sanitation Foundation, 614 F.2d 126 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 826 , 101 S.Ct. 89 , 66 L.Ed.2d 29 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., and the Sierra Club v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and American Petroleum Institute, Intervenors. Conoco, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Respondent-Intervenor. Bob Martinez, Governor, and Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, ] v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and American Petroleum Institute, Respondents-Intervenors. American Petroleum Institute v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Respondent-Intervenor
See Pacific Legal Found. v. Quarles, 440 F.Supp. 316, 326 (C.D.Cal.1977), aff'd sub nom., Kilroy v. Quarles, 614 F.2d 225 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 825 , 101 S.Ct. 88 , 66 L.Ed.2d 29 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
See Pacific Legal Found. v. Quarles, 440 F.Supp. 316, 326 (C.D.Cal.1977), aff'd sub nom., Kilroy v. Quarles, 614 F.2d 225 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 825 , 101 S.Ct. 88 , 66 L.Ed.2d 29 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Consolidated Metal Products, Inc. v. American Petroleum Institute
(2×)
See Eliason Corp. v. National Sanitation Foundation, 614 F.2d 126, 129 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 826 , 101 S.Ct. 89 , 66 L.Ed.2d 29 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. State of Missouri
(2×)
See Adams v. United States, 620 F.2d 1277, 1280 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 826 , 101 S.Ct. 88 , 66 L.Ed.2d 29 (1980). 202 Prior to 1954, school districts in Missouri were not even in compliance with the "separate but equal" doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 , 16 S.Ct. 1138 , 41 L.Ed. 256 (1896).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. Missouri
(2×)
See Adams v. United States, 620 F.2d 1277, 1280 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 826 , 101 S.Ct. 88 , 66 L.Ed.2d 29 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Liddell v. Board of Education
(2×)
See Adams v. United States, 620 F.2d 1277 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 826 , 101 S.Ct. 88 , 66 L.Ed.2d 29 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bristol Locknut Company, Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. Sps Technologies, Inc., Defendant/appellant/cross-Appellee
PAYMENT OF ROYALTIES UNTIL THE PATENTS’ VALIDITY WAS CHALLENGED A licensee remains obligated to pay all royalties under a licensing agreement which accrue until it takes an affirmative step that would prompt the early adjudication of the validity of the patent, such as filing an action contesting the patent’s validity or notifying the licensor that the payments were being stopped because the patent was believed to be invalid. 7 PPG Industries, Inc. v. Westwood Chemical, Inc., 530 F.2d 700, 701 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 824 , 97 S.Ct. 76 , 50 L.Ed.2d 86 (1976); accord, American Ste…
discussed
Cited "see"
Craton Liddell, a Minor, and Mary Puleo, Gerard Puleo, Emma Dannenberg, Robin Dannenberg, Louis Reineri and Mary Anjela Reineri, Representing the \Involved Citizens Committee\" United States of America v. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis and Daniel L. Schlafly
(2×)
See Adams v. United States, 620 F.2d 1277 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 826 , 101 S.Ct. 88 , 66 L.Ed.2d 29 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Liddell v. Board of Education
(2×)
See Adams v. United States, 620 F.2d 1277 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 826 , 101 S.Ct. 88 , 66 L.Ed.2d 29 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cross Timbers Concerned Citizens v. Saginaw
See, e.g., Pacific Legal Found, v. Quarles,. 440 F.Supp. 316 , 320-21 & n. 2 (C.D.Cal.1977), aff'd sub nom., Kilroy v. Quarles, 614 F.2d 225 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 825 , 101 S.Ct. 88 , 66 L.Ed.2d 29 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andrews v. Fitzgerald
(2×)
See also, State v. Seay, 44 N.CApp. 301, 260 S.E.2d 786 (1979) (upholding trial court’s definition of fiduciary as “a person having a duty created by his undertaking to act primarily for another’s benefit”), appeal dismissed, 299 N.C. 333 , 265 S.E.2d 401 , cert, denied, 449 U.S. 826 , 101 S.Ct. 89 , 66 L.Ed.2d 29 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Steinbrecher v. Mid-Penn Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Steinbrecher)
See, e.g., Harris v. Tower Loan of Mississippi, Inc., 609 F.2d 120, 123 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 826 , 101 S.Ct. 89 , 66 L.Ed.2d 30 (1980); Reid v. Liberty Consumer Discount Co., 484 F.Supp. 435, 441 (E.D.Pa.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moore v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission
See also Chlorine Institute, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Admin., 613 F.2d 120 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 826 , 101 S.Ct. 89 , 66 L.Ed.2d 30 (1980); Upjohn Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 381 F.2d 4 (6th Cir.1967). .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert W. Kelley v. Metropolitan County Board of Education of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
(4×)
See also Adams v. United States, 620 F.2d 1277 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 826 , 101 S.Ct. 88 , 66 L.Ed.2d 29 (1980); Anderson v. Dougherty City Bd. of Educ., 609 F.2d 225 (5th Cir. 1980); Mills v. Polk County Bd. of Educ., 575 F.2d 1146 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Texas Ed. Agency, 532 F.2d 380 (5th Cir.), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 429 U.S. 990 , 97 S.Ct. 517 , 50 L.Ed.2d 603 (1976), concepts reaffirmed, 564 F.2d 162 (5th Cir. 1977); Clark v. Bd. of Educ., 465 F.2d 1044 (8th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 413 U.S. 923 , 93 S.Ct. 3054 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1973); and Flax v. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diaz v. San Jose Unified School District
(2×)
See, e.g., Adams v. United States, 620 F.2d 1277, 1298-99 (8th Cir.), *630 cert. denied, 449 U.S. 826 , 101 S.Ct. 88 , 66 L.Ed.2d 29 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
General Committee of Adjustment, United Transportation Union E
v.
Burlington Northern, Inc.
v.
Burlington Northern, Inc.
No. 79-1748.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2) · N.D. Illinois (2)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.