green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Adler v. I & M Rail Link, L.L.C.
See Hendley v. Central of Georgia R.R., 609 F.2d 1146 , 1152-53 & n. 5 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1093 , 101 S.Ct. 890 , 66 L.Ed.2d 822 (1981). “[A] district court’s ability to enjoin a hearing or conduct which violates § 60 is essential to effectuate the purpose of the section.” Id. at 1152.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bruce E. Hornsby v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company
(2×)
See Hendley v. Central of Georgia R.R., 609 F.2d 1146 , 1152-53 & n. 5 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1093 , 101 S.Ct. 890 , 66 L.Ed.2d 822 (1981). "[A] district court's ability to enjoin a hearing or conduct which violates § 60 is essential to effectuate the purpose of the section." Id. at 1152.
cited
Cited "see"
Hornsby v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.
See Hendley v. Central Georgia Railroad Company, 609 F.2d 1146 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1093 , 101 S.Ct. 890 , 66 L.Ed.2d 822 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Felipe Morales v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company
See Hendley v. Central of Ga. R.R., 609 F.2d 1146, 1150 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1093 , 101 S.Ct. 890 , 66 L.Ed.2d 822 (1981); Brown v. American Airlines, Inc., 593 F.2d 652 , 653 & n. 1 (5th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Evans v. Central of Georgia Railroad
Union, 718 F.2d 1012 (11th Cir.1983); See also Hendley v. Central of Georgia Railroad, 442 F.Supp. 482 , rev’d on other grounds, 609 F.2d 1146 (1980) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1093 , 101 S.Ct. 890 , 66 L.Ed.2d 822 (1981) (S.D.Ga.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. H. David Miller, United States of America v. Continental Fuel Co., Inc., United States of America v. Don A. Bliesner
See Ogden, 303 F.2d at 736-37 ; see also United States v. Lutz, 621 F.2d 940, 948 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 859 , 101 S.Ct. 160 , 66 L.Ed.2d 75 (1980) and 449 U.S. 1093 , 101 S.Ct. 890 , 66 L.Ed.2d 822 (1981) (once witness testified that interviewing government attorney took notes, it was error to fail to conduct inquiry as to whether he had adopted or approved those notes).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Central of Georgia Railroad Co.
v.
Hendley
v.
Hendley
No. 79-1922.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1981.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of National Railway Labor Conference for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.