green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Moran v. Household International, Inc.
See, Dan River, Inc. v. Unitex Ltd., 4th Cir., 624 F.2d 1216, 1225 (1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1101 , 101 S.Ct. 896 , 66 L.Ed.2d 827 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Motient Corp. v. Dondero
Importantly, Congress did not enact the Act to “tip the scales in favor of management or its opponents, but to ensure that a public shareholder, confronted by cash tender for his stock, can obtain adequate information about the qualifications and intentions of the offering party before responding to the offer.” Id.; see also Dan River, Inc. v. Unitex Ltd., 624 F.2d 1216, 1221 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 1101 , 101 S.Ct. 896 , 66 L.Ed.2d 827 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John Carr v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n, Greg Brooks, Judy Checkers v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n
(2×)
See Republic Steel, 379 U.S. at 652 , 85 S.Ct. at 616 (quoting Steele v. Louisville & Nashville Ry., 323 U.S. 192, 206 , 65 S.Ct. 226, 234 , 89 L.Ed. 173 (1944) ("employees should [not] be required to submit their controversy to 'a group which is in large part chosen by the [defendants] against whom their real complaint is made' ")); see also Williams v. Pacific Maritime Ass'n, 617 F.2d 1321 , 1328 n. 13 (9th Cir.1980) (dicta), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1101 , 101 S.Ct. 896 , 66 L.Ed.2d 827 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seagoing Uniform Corp. v. Texaco, Inc.
Robins Co., 465 F.Supp. 904, 908 (S.D.N.Y.1979), rev’d *929 on other grounds, 607 F.2d 545 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 446 U.S. 946 , 100 S.Ct. 2175 , 64 L.Ed.2d 802 (1980) (“there is a duty to correct or revise a prior statement which was accurate when made but which has become misleading due to subsequent events.”); see also Telvest, Inc. v. Bradshaw, 697 F.2d 576, 581 (4th Cir.1983) (“under the federal securities law any ‘perceptible desire to influence substantially the issuer’s operations’ regardless of a ‘fixed plan’ to acquire control must be disclosed.”) (quoting …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Smith (In Re Smith)
See also Wasserman v. Washington (In re Washington), 623 F.2d 1169 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 1101 , 101 S.Ct. 896 , 66 L.Ed.2d 826 (1981) (under the 1898 Bankruptcy Act, principles of comity require that, as between state and federal courts, the first court to obtain jurisdiction would retain it); 9 Johnson v. Fisher (In re Fisher), 67 B.R. 666 (Bankr.D.Colo.1986) (wife granted relief from stay to allow divorce court to determine the value of her share of the marital property in the husband’s bankruptcy estate, uniquely a problem of interpretation and application of domestic rela…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Unitex Ltd.
v.
Dan River, Inc.
v.
Dan River, Inc.
No. 80-293.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1981.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.