green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[Registered marks are presumed to represent the source in the minds of the public ... ”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Woodke v. Dahm
But see Vibrant Sales, Inc. v. New Body Boutique, Inc., 652 F.2d 299, 305 (2d Cir.1981) (requiring that where defendant used a photograph of plaintiffs product to sell defendant’s own product, a claim under § 43(a) would lie only where defendant could not ship exactly what defendant depicted in its advertisement, or where the casting depicted in the photograph is so distinctively associated with the plaintiff that it operates much in the manner of a trademark), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1257 , 71 L.Ed.2d 448 (1982).
discussed
Cited "but see"
ca3 1992
But see Vibrant Sales, Inc. v. New Body Boutique, Inc., 652 F.2d 299 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1257 , 71 L.Ed.2d 448 (1982) (no § 43(a) violation where defendants used a photograph of plaintiff's waist-reducing belt in their advertising). 36 Here, however, even assuming Roosevelt depicted a Zip-Rib panel in its brochure, 6 we do not believe this gives rise to a § 43(a) violation.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Merchant & Evans, Inc. v. Roosevelt Building Products Co.
But see Vibrant Sales, Inc. v. New Body Boutique, Inc., 652 F.2d 299 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1257 , 71 L.Ed.2d 448 (1982) (no § 43(a) violation where defendants used a photograph of plaintiff's waist-reducing belt in their advertising).
examined
Cited "but see"
Russell Earl Nichols v. George Sullivan
litigant is not denied due process by either the "appearance" of partiality or by circumstances which might lead one to speculate as to a judge's impartiality. a litigant is denied due process if he is in fact treated unfairly.
examined
Cited "but see"
Jerry Michael Gordon v. Doug Norman, Harold Prows, Ken Martin (85-5175), and J. Anderson (85-5186)
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
But see Van Ooteghem v. Gray, 628 F.2d 488 , 495 n. 7 (5th Cir.1980), aff'd in part, vacated in part on other grounds, 654 F.2d 304 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc) (per curiam), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1255 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982) (serious conflict of interest could exist in future § 1983 actions in which one attorney represents both a county and a county official individually).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc. v. Levi Strauss & Co.
registered marks are presumed to represent the source in the minds of the public ...
cited
Cited "see"
Blank v. Pollack
See Vibrant Sales, Inc. v. New Body Boutique, Inc., 652 F.2d 299, 303 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1257 , 71 L.Ed.2d 448 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pompano-Windy City Partners, Ltd. v. Bear Stearns & Co.
In fact, the caselaw is consistent in holding that “a seller of options, like plaintiff, is not a purchaser.” Panek v. Bogucz, 718 F.Supp. 1228, 1231 (D.N.J.1989); accord Gutter v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 644 F.2d 1194, 1196 (6th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1256 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982); Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Cullather, 678 F.Supp. 601, 605-06 (E.D.Va.1987); cf. Mix v. E.F.
cited
Cited "see"
Bonelli v. Bonelli
See Margoles v. Johns, 660 F.2d 291, 301 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S. Ct. 1256 , 71 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wesco Products Co. And Donald Horwitz v. Alloy Automotive Co., and Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.
(2×)
See Margoles v. Johns, 660 F.2d 291, 295 (7th Cir.1981), cert. den. 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1256 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mix v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
See Gutter v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 644 F.2d 1194, 1196 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1256 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982) (“It is clear that an option writer sells the right to purchase [or sell] securities and is not purchasing anything.”); Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Cullather, 678 F.Supp. 601, 605-06 (E.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Motor Carriers Labor Advisory Council v. Trucking Management, Inc.
The equal representation requirement was designed primarily to limit “possible abuse by union officers of the power which they might achieve if welfare funds were left solely to their sole control.” Arroyo v. United States, 359 U.S. 419, 426 , 79 S.Ct. 864, 868 , 3 L.Ed.2d 915 (1959); see National Stabilization Agreement of Sheetmetal Industry Trust Fund v. Commercial Roofing & Sheetmetal, 655 F.2d 1218 , 1223 & n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1256 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982); Denver Metropolitan Association of Plumbing, Heating, Cooling Contractors v. Journeyman Pl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Clamp Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Enco Manufacturing Company, Inc., Colex, Inc.
See Vibrant Sales, Inc. v. New Body Boutique, Inc., 652 F.2d 299, 304 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1257 , 71 L.Ed. 2d 448 (1982) (copying of waist reduction belt); Fisher Stoves, Inc. v. All Nighter Stove Works, Inc., 626 F.2d 193, 195 (1st Cir.1980) (copying of wood stove except for nameplate).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scan-Plast Industries, Inc. v. Scanimport America Inc.
See, Vibrant Sales, Inc. v. New Body Boutique, Inc., 652 F.2d 299, 303 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1257 , 71 L.Ed.2d 448 (1982) (belt’s material, fasteners, graduated sizes, reversibility and stitching held functional and subject to copying); La Fratelli v. Charles Craig, Ltd., 725 F.2d 18, 20 (2d Cir.1984) (overall design of sofa held to be functional where there was no arbitrary embellishment or label).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Daggett County Board of Education
(2×)
See Van Ooteghem v. Gray, 628 F.2d 488 , 495 n. 7 (5th Cir.1980), on reh. 654 F.2d 304 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1255 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982); Shadid v. Jackson, 521 F.Supp. 87 (E.D.Tex.1981) (nonconsentable conflict in such a case).
discussed
Cited "see"
Can Am Engineering Co. v. Henderson Glass, Inc.
See Vibrant Sales Inc. v. New Body Boutique, 652 F.2d 299 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1257 , 71 L.Ed.2d 448 (1982); Bangor Punta Operations, Inc. v. Universal Marine Co., Ltd., 543 F.2d 1107 (5th Cir.1976) (palming off); Truck Equipment Service Co. v. Fruehauf Corp., 536 F.2d 1210 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 861 , 97 S.Ct. 164 , 50 L.Ed. 139 (1976) (reverse passing off); L’Aiglon Apparel, Inc. v. Lane Lobell, Inc., 214 F.2d 649 (3d Cir.1954) (use of photograph of plaintiffs dress to advertise defendant’s inferior quality dress actionable under Section 4…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John M. Murphy
(2×)
See Margoles v. Johns, 660 F.2d 291 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1256 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982) (appearance of impropriety, and perhaps even actual impropriety, may not be raised for the first time on collateral attack); Barry v. United States, 528 F.2d 1094, 1100 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 826 , 97 S.Ct. 81 , 50 L.Ed.2d 88 (1976) (when the trial is “impeccably fair and just” an erroneous failure to recuse is harmless error), A judicial impropriety serious enough, and secret enough, to escape everyone’s notice before trial probably also would be serious en…
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. City of New York
(2×)
See Van Ooteghem v. Gray, 628 F.2d 488 , 495 n. 7 (5th Cir.1980), aff'd in part, vacated in part on other grounds, 654 F.2d 304 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc) (per curiam), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1255 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Pamela Lea Maier v. Verne Orr, Secretary of the Air Force
See Margoles v. Johns, 660 F.2d 291 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1256 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.
Inc. v. Gay Toys, Inc., 724 F.2d at 332; see Vibrant Sales, Inc., 652 F.2d at 303-04 , cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1257 , 71 L.Ed.2d 448 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
35 Fair empl.prac.cas. 697, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,582 Henry Irby, Cross-Appellees v. Mike Sullivan, Jr., Cross-Appellants
(2×)
See Van Ooteghem v. Gray, 654 F.2d 304, 306 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1255 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dunton v. County of Suffolk
(2×)
See Van Ooteghem v. Gray, 628 F.2d 488 , 495 n. 7 (5th Cir.1980), aff'd in part, vacated in part on other grounds, 654 F.2d 304 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc) (per curiam), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1255 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dunton v. County Of Suffolk
(2×)
See Van Ooteghem v. Gray, 628 F.2d 488 , 495 n. 7 (5th Cir.1980), aff'd in part, vacated in part on other grounds, 654 F.2d 304 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc) (per curiam), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1255 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gemveto Jewelry Co., Inc. v. Jeff Cooper Inc.
See Vibrant Sales, Inc. v. New Body Boutique, Inc., 652 F.2d 299, 303 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1257 , 71 L.Ed.2d 448 (1982); Ives Laboratories, Inc. v. Darby Drug Co., 601 F.2d 631, 642-43 (2d Cir.1979), quoting Pagliero v. Wallace China Co., 198 F.2d 339, 343 (9th Cir.1952); Crescent Tool Co. v. Kilborn & Bishop Co., 247 F. 299 (2d Cir.1917).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas Berdin, Cross-Appellants v. John Duggan, Cross-Appellees
(2×)
See Van Ooteghem v. Gray, 654 F.2d 304, 305 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1255 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Alfred Morris v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
(2×)
See Van Ooteghem v. Gray, 654 F.2d 304, 306 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1255 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Ezra Waters v. Clinton Chaffin, Etc.
See Van Ooteghem v. Gray, 654 F.2d 304, 305 (5th Cir. 1981) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1255 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982); Bickel v. Burkhart, 632 F.2d at 1255 n.7.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
FOUNDATION INTERN. v. ET Ige Const.
(Emphasis added.) It has been held that communications regarding the content of orders would be vacated only if the process used by the judge was "fundamentally unfair." See In re Colony Square Co., 819 F.2d 272, 276 (11th Cir.1987) ("orders [drafted by a party litigant] will be vacated only if a party can demonstrate that the process by which the judge arrived at them was fundamentally unfair"); see also Margoles v. Johns, 660 F.2d 291, 296 (7th Cir.1981) ("A litigant is denied the fundamental fairness to which he [or she] is constitutionally entitled if the judge of his [or her] case is unfa…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Foundation International, Inc. v. E.T. Ige Construction, Inc.
(Emphasis added.) It has been held that communications regarding the content of orders would be vacated only if the process used by the judge was “fundamentally unfair.” See In re Colony Square Co., 819 F.2d 272, 276 (11th Cir.1987) (“orders [drafted by a party litigant] will be vacated only if a party can demonstrate that the process by which the judge arrived at them was fundamentally unfair”); see also Margoles v. Johns, 660 F.2d 291, 296 (7th Cir.1981) (“A litigant is denied the fundamental fairness to which he [or she] is constitutionally entitled if the judge of his [or her] ca…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wetzel County Solid Waste Authority v. West Virginia Division of Natural Resources
Compare Schneider Transport, Inc. v. Cattanach, 657 F.2d 128 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1257 , 71 L.Ed.2d 448 (1982) (The registration fee imposed by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation upon trucks is a tax because the revenue derived from the fee is used to pay for highway construction).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Score, Inc. v. Cap Cities/ABC, Inc.
Fix-It, Inc., 781 F.2d 604, 610 (7th Cir.1986); see also Vibrant Sales, Inc. v. New Body Boutique, Inc., 652 F.2d 299, 303 (2d Cir.1981) *200 (requiring proof of secondary meaning and non-functionality insures that only "unique or distinctive identifying features" receive protection), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1257 , 71 L.Ed.2d 448 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cronson v. Clark
But that alone would not be a sufficient basis for imposing a constitutional requirement under the Due Process Clause.” Id. at 1585 ; see also Margoles v. Johns, 660 F.2d 291, 297 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1256 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lesportsac, Inc. v. K Mart Corporation
Compare Vibrant Sales, Inc. v. New Body Boutique, Inc., 652 F.2d 299, 303-04 (2d Cir.1981) (apparently suggesting, in dicta, that burden is on plaintiff), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1257 , 71 L.Ed.2d 448 (1982), with Warner II, supra, 724 F.2d at 330 -32 *76 (discussing “functionality defense”), and Ives Laboratories, supra, 601 F.2d at 643 (affirming denial of preliminary injunction; “case for functionality ... depends on the evidence proffered by defendants ... ”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Boatowners And Tenants Association, Inc. v. Port Of Seattle
See e.g., Yapalater v. Bates, 494 F.Supp. 1349, 1358 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd 644 F.2d 131 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 908 , 102 S.Ct. 1255 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Boatowners & Tenants Ass'n v. Port of Seattle
See eg., Yapalater v. Bates, 494 F.Supp. 1349, 1358 (S.D.N.Y. 1980), aff’d 644 F.2d 131 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 908 , 102 S.Ct. 1255 , 71 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John H. Harland Company, Cross-Appellant v. Clarke Checks, Inc., Cross-Appellee
Compare, e.g., Vibrant Sales, Inc. v. New Body Boutique, Inc., 652 F.2d 299 (2d Cir.1981) (placing burden on plaintiff), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 909 , 102 S.Ct. 1257 , 71 L.Ed.2d 448 (1982), with Ives Laboratories, Inc. v. Darby Drug Co., 601 F.2d 631, 643 (2d Cir.1979) (stating, in affirming the denial of a preliminary injunction, that “[t]he case for functionality ... depends on the evidence proffered by defendants that copying [certain colors] served a number of utilitarian purposes”).
Gray, Treasurer of Harris County, Texas (Kriegel, successor in office)
v.
Van Ooteghem
v.
Van Ooteghem
No. 81-938.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1982.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1) · S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.