green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1985 ·
…he line between protected expression and punishable obscenity must be drawn at the limits of a community's tolerance, rather than in accordance with the dangerous standards of propriety and taste.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
People Ex Rel. Tooley v. Seven Thirty-Five East Colfax, Inc.
(2×)
he line between protected expression and punishable obscenity must be drawn at the limits of a community's tolerance, rather than in accordance with the dangerous standards of propriety and taste.
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. Pryor
See Theatres West, Inc. v. Holmes, 455 U.S. 913, 102 S.Ct. 1264 , 71 L.Ed.2d 453 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louisiana Debating and Literary Ass'n v. City of New Orleans
See Red Bluff Drive-In, Inc. v. Vance, 648 F.2d 1020, 1032 (5th Cir.1981) (“in view of the high cost of abstention in the context of suits seeking review of statutes exerting a purported chilling effect on First Amendment rights, ... we cannot say that [the] district court abused its discretion in declining to invoke Pullman abstention”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 913 , 102 S.Ct. 1264 , 71 L.Ed.2d 453 (1982). 12 In sum, the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to abstain. 13 Therefore, we turn to the merits.
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
See Red Bluff Drive-In, Inc. v. Vance, 648 F.2d 1020, 1036 (5th Cir.Unit A June 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 913 , 102 S.Ct. 1264 , 71 L.Ed.2d 453 (1982); Andrews v. State, 652 S.W.2d 370, 382 (Tex.Crim.App.1983); Fletcher v. State, 633 S.W.2d 895, 896 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrews v. State
(2×)
See Red Bluff Drive-In, Inc. v. Vance, 648 F.2d 1020 (CA5 1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 913 , 102 S.Ct. 1264 , 71 L.Ed.2d 453 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Asaff v. State
Compare Carlock, 609 S.W.2d at 788 (jury must determine what is or is not acceptable according to contemporary community standards) with Smith v. United States, 431 U.S. 291, 305 , 97 S.Ct. 1756, 1766 , 52 L.Ed.2d 324 (1977) (contemporary community standards must be applied by juries in accordance with their understanding of the tolerance of the average person in the community) and Red Bluff Drive-In, Inc. v. Vance, 648 F.2d 1020, 1029 (5th Cir. Unit A June 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 913 , 102 S.Ct. 1264 , 71 L.Ed.2d 453 (1982) (line between protected expression and punishable obscenity mus…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
J-R Distributors, Inc. v. Eikenberry
See, e.g., Red Bluff Drive-In, Inc. v. Vance, 648 F.2d 1020 , 1029 n. 7 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 913 , 102 S.Ct. 1264 , 71 L.Ed.2d 453 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Midkiff v. Tom
See, e.g., Red Bluff Drive-In, Inc. v. Vance, 648 F.2d 1020 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 913 , 102 S.Ct. 1264 , 71 L.Ed.2d 453 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Midkiff v. Tom
See, e.g., Red Bluff Drive-In, Inc. v. Vance, 648 F.2d 1020 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 913 , 102 S.Ct. 1264 , 71 L.Ed.2d 453 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Theatres West, Inc., dba Westworld Cinema, Theatre Deauville, and Cinema West
v.
Holmes, Harris County District Attorney
v.
Holmes, Harris County District Attorney
No. 81-974.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1982.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.