green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ivie Clay, a Minor v. Director, Juvenile Division, Department of Corrections
(2×)
But see Crick v. Smith, 650 F.2d 860, 867-68 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); Boyer v. Patton, 579 F.2d 284, 286 (3d Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Agundis
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 792 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982) (letter addressed to all four defendants by name and referring to a boat, offered for purpose of linking the defendants with one another and to the vessel, was not hearsay); United States v. Canieso, 470 F.2d 1224, 1232 (2d Cir.1972) (letter found in co-defendant’s wallet, which was similar to letter found on defendant, was not hearsay when offered not as proof of statements therein but only as circumstantial evidence that the two defendants were linked).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sanchez-Lopez
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 792 (5th Cir.1981) (letter addressed to individuals charged with a conspiracy which was found on a vessel containing contraband was not admitted for its truth, but was relevant evidence admitted for the limited purpose of linking the individuals to the vessel and to each other), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Lopez, 584 F.2d 1175, 1179 (2d Cir.1978) (taped conversation between two persons was not admitted for its truth, but was relevant evidence to show that the two individuals knew each other).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Epifanio Sanchez-Lopez Brijido Astorga-Ayon, United States of America v. Antonio Martinez-Ortega, United States of America v. Guillermo Sanchez-Lopez
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 792 (5th Cir.1981) (letter addressed to individuals charged with a conspiracy which was found on a vessel containing contraband was not admitted for its truth, but was relevant evidence admitted for the limited purpose of linking the individuals to the vessel and to each other), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Lopez, 584 F.2d 1175, 1179 (2d Cir.1978) (taped conversation between two persons was not admitted for its truth, but was relevant evidence to show that the two individuals knew each other).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kevin Winston Osborn v. Duane Shillinger, Warden of the Wyoming State Penitentiary A.G. McClintock the Attorney General of the State of Wyoming
Following this rationale, we have consistently held with respect to direct appeals that until the Supreme Court overrules Fay , “we shall apply the rule of that ease at least to situations in which no state appeal has been taken.” Holcomb v. Murphy, 701 F.2d 1307, 1310 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 3546 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1983); see Worthen v. Meachum, 842 F.2d 1179, 1181 (10th Cir.1988); accord Crick v. Smith, 650 F.2d 860, 867 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); Boyer v. Patton, 579 F.2d 284, 286 (3d Cir.1978). 11 Our ow…
discussed
Cited "see"
Strickland v. Marshall
Chief Justice Burger’s concurring opinion in Sykes indicates that this standard has continuing applicability where the default is the result of a decision made by the defendant himself. 433 U.S. at 92 , 97 S.Ct. at 2509 ; accord, Crick v. Smith, 650 F.2d 860, 863 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1981).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Levino Michelena-Orovio
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See, for example, United States v. Mazyak, 5 Cir. 1981, 650 F.2d 788 , cert. denied, 1982, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 ; United States v. Shelnut, 5 Cir.1980, 625 F.2d 59 , cert. denied, 1981, 450 U.S. 983 , 101 S.Ct. 1520 , 67 L.Ed.2d 818 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ira Eugene Borchardt
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 790-91 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Grayson, 625 F.2d 66, 67 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Chaparro-Almeida
(2×)
Accord, United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 791 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. DeLeon, 641 F.2d 330, 335 (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. Rodriguez, 585 F.2d 1234 (5th Cir. 1978), aff’d en banc on other grounds, 612 F.2d 906 (1980), aff’d sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alvaro Chaparro-Almeida
Accord, United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 791 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. DeLeon, 641 F.2d 330, 335 (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. Rodriguez, 585 F.2d 1234 (5th Cir. 1978), aff'd en banc on other grounds, 612 F.2d 906 (1980), aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Saimiento-Rozo
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 791 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862, 886, n.41 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Saimiento-Rozo
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 791 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d ---- (1982); United States v. Postal, 589 F.2d 862, 886, n.41 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 832 , 100 S.Ct. 61 , 62 L.Ed.2d 40 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Hartwell Liles, Michael Harold Jones, John Richard Salane
See United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 791 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Alfrey, 620 F.2d 551 , *993 555-56 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 938 , 101 S.Ct. 337 , 66 L.Ed.2d 160 (1980). 9 AFFIRMED. 1 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick C. David
Id. at 297 ; see also United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 792 (5th Cir.1981) (upholding the admission of a letter challenged as hearsay because it was not used to prove the truth of the contents therein, but rather as circumstantial proof that the appellants were associated with each other), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Canieso, 470 F.2d 1224, 1232 (2d Cir.1972) (describing a letter as non-hearsay because it was used merely as circumstantial proof that the parties were linked).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Damian Hawkins and Peter Hawkins
Evid. 801(c); see also United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788, 792 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Watley
See State v. Galvan, 90 N.M. 129 , 560 P.2d 550 (Ct.App.1977); see also United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 , 101 S.Ct. 690 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 923 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raul Luis-Gonzalez, Leonardo Espinosa, Oswaldo Carbonell, Marcelian Torres-Gomez, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Mann, 615 F.2d 668 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 994 , 101 S.Ct. 1694 , 68 L.Ed.2d 193 (1981); see generally United States v. Michelena-Orovio, 702 F.2d 496 (5th Cir.) (majority holds that intent to distribute cannot be inferred from the size of the cache and participation in a conspiracy to import; dissent argues that such evidence is sufficient), reh’g en banc granted, 706 F.2d 502 (5th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Levino Michelena-Orovio
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Mann, 615 F.2d 668 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 994 , 101 S.Ct. 1694 , 68 L.Ed.2d 193 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David Paul Hammer v. Larry Meachum, Director Oklahoma Department of Corrections and J. M. Sunderland
See, e.g., Crick v. Smith, 650 F.2d 860 (6th Cir. 1981) (applying Fay deliberate bypass test where default was failure to appeal), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); Forman v. Smith, 633 F.2d 634 (2d Cir. 1980) (applying Sykes where petitioner failed to raise issue on direct appeal), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1001 , 101 S.Ct. 1710 , 68 L.Ed.2d 204 (1981); Cole v. Stevenson, 620 F.2d 1055 (4th Cir.) (applying Sykes where petitioner did not raise issue on direct appeal or preserve it at trial), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1004 , 101 S.Ct. 545 , 66 L.Ed.2d 301 (1980); P…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Russell Lee Riker, Jr., William David Fotheringham
See, e.g., United States v. Mazyak, 650 F.2d 788 , 790-91 & n.2 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1281 , 71 L.Ed.2d 464 (1982); United States v. Robbins, 629 F.2d 1105, 1106 (5th Cir. 1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Crick
v.
Smith, Warden, Kentucky State Reformatory
v.
Smith, Warden, Kentucky State Reformatory
No. 81-5694.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1982.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.