green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
11.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1992 ·
…the decision to grant relief under 29 u.s.c. 1132 (c) is committed to the discretion of the trial judge.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Murphy R. Godwin v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
the decision to grant relief under 29 u.s.c. 1132 (c) is committed to the discretion of the trial judge.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Godwin v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of Canada
the decision to grant relief under 29 u.s.c. 1132 (c) is committed to the discretion of the trial judge.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lawrence v. Jackson MacK Sales, Inc.
cause of action does not become a presently enforceable demand until a claim is denied.... we hold that for purposes of erisa a cause of action does not accrue until an application is denied.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Alan Shackleford
overwhelming strength of government's case"; other evidence properly admitted "was exceptionally conclusive
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Morse v. Stanley
the trustee's decision withstands scrutiny ... he treated all similarly situated persons the same.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Woralak Kalyawongsa Udo Liell, Philip P. Durand E. Michael Morris, Attorneys-Appellees v. Margaret Jean Moffett
Krause v. Rhodes, 640 F.2d 214 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 836 , 102 S.Ct. 140 , 70 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981), held that federal district judges have “broad equity power to supervise the collection of attorneys’ fees under contingent fee contracts.” Id. at 218.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re AH Robins Co., Inc.
While a contingency fee may have been reasonable when the contract was signed, intervening circumstances can render a reasonable contract “unfair in its enforcement.” Id. at 220; accord McKenzie Constr.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States of America, Ex Rel. Taxpayers Against Fraud and Chester L. Walsh v. General Electric Company
(2×)
Id. at 218. 71 In itself, there can be no objection to a law firm undertaking a plaintiff-client's risky course of litigation in exchange for a 25% contingency fee.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. James L. Pratt, Jr.
See United States v. Sangmeister, 685 F.2d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir.1982); United States v. Becton, 632 F.2d 1294 (5th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 141 , 70 L.Ed.2d 117 *993 (1981) (hung jury may reflect independence of jury rather than insufficient evidence).
discussed
Cited "see"
Greenan v. Greenan
See Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Tucker, 183 Conn. 85 , 91–92, 438 A.2d 828 (procedural due process requirements satis- fied when party opposing reasonableness of attorney’s fees is afforded opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine opposing parties’ witnesses on question of reasonableness), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S. Ct. 143 , 70 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Panganiban v. Panganiban
See Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Tucker, 183 Conn. 85, 91 , 438 A.2d 828 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S. Ct. 143 , 70 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Dobozy v. Dobozy
See Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Tucker, 183 Conn. 85, 91 , 438 A.2d 828 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S. Ct. 143 , 70 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis Allen Brewer
(2×)
See United States v. Reed, 647 F.2d 678, 686 (6th Cir.) (Rule 404(b) doesn’t justify elicitation of testimony that defendants are known burglars or fences in trial on charges of receiving stolen goods.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 1037, 102 S.Ct. 142 , 580, 70 L.Ed.2d 118 , 483 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Augustine Chikadili Okayfor (92-1706), and Tim Okosi (92-1812)
See United States v. Reed, 647 F.2d 678, 687 (6th Cir.) (evidence viola-tive of Rule 404(b) did not adversely affect the substantial rights of the defendants to a fair trial), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 142 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Hallenbeck v. St. Mark Evangelist Corp.
See Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Tucker, 183 Conn. 85, 90 , 438 A.2d 828 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S. Ct. 143 , 70 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sergio M. Damiani
See United States v. Reed, 647 F.2d 678 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sks Die Casting & MacHining Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Sks Die Casting & MacHining Inc.
(2×)
See Teamsters Local 115 v. NLRB, 640 F.2d 392 , 395 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 827 , 102 S.Ct. 119 , 70 L.Ed.2d 102 and 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 141 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Nowling v. Aero Services International, Inc.
See Alabama ex rel Graddick v. TVA, 636 F.2d 1061 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 142 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Piano v. Davison
(2×)
See Wilson v. Clark (1981), 84 Ill. 2d 186 , 417 N.E.2d 1322 , cert, denied (1981), 454 U.S. 836 , 70 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Martin v. Zucker
See Wilson v. Clark (1981), 84 Ill. 2d 186, 192 , 417 N.E.2d 1322 , cert, denied (1981), 454 U.S. 836 , 70 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry Daniel Stull, Sr., Henry Daniel Stull, Jr., and Patricia Mooradian
See United States v. Reed, 647 F.2d 678, 689 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 142 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); United States v. Lutz, 621 F.2d 940, 945 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 859 , 101 S.Ct. 160 , 66 L.Ed.2d 75 (1981).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert I. Gulledge
(3×)
See United States v. Becton, 632 F.2d 1294, 1296 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 141 , 70 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981).
examined
Cited "see"
Thomas Menhorn v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Paris v. Profit Sharing Plan, etc., 637 F.2d 357, 361 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 836 , 102 S.Ct. 140 , 70 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981); Winer v. Edison Bros.
cited
Cited "see"
33 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1816, 33 Fair empl.prac.cas. 945, 33 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,045, 4 Employee Benefits Ca 2684 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation
See Paris v. Profit Sharing Plan, 637 F.2d 357, 361 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 836 , 102 S.Ct. 140 , 70 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981); Reiherzer v. Shannon, 581 F.2d 1266, 1272 (7th Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See Paris v. Profit Sharing Plan, 637 F.2d 357, 361 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 836 , 102 S.Ct. 140 , 70 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981); Reiherzer v. Shannon, 581 F.2d 1266, 1272 (7th Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan
See Paris v. Profit Sharing Plan, 637 F.2d 357, 362 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 836 , 102 S.Ct. 140 , 70 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981); Nugent v. Jesuit High School, 625 F.2d 1285, 1285-86 (5th Cir.1980); LeFebre v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 549 F.Supp. 1021, 1028 (D.Md.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Friends for All Children, Inc. v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.
See Krause v. Rhodes, 640 F.2d 214 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 836 , 102 S.Ct. 140 , 70 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981); Cappel v. Adams, 434 F.2d 1278 (5th Cir.1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Home Loan Mortgage v. 69 Ward LLC, No. Cv-98-584831 (Jun. 2, 1999)
Proc., Pt. 9, 1975 Sess., pp. 4354-55; see also Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Tucker , 183 Conn. 85 , 94 n. 3, 438 A.2d 828 , cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S. Ct 143 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981). 1 While a foreclosure receivership may differ from the obligations of a landlord to make payments on a mortgage, the same reasoning that permits a utility receivership to have priority over mortgage payments should also allow it to have priority over a foreclosure receivership.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelly v. Chase Manhattan Bank
See Pollock v. Castrovinci, 476 F.Supp. 606, 618 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd mem., 622 F.2d 575 (2d Cir.1980); see also Paris v. Profit Sharing Plan, 637 F.2d 357, 362 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 836 , 102 S.Ct. 140 , 70 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981); Chambers v. European American Bank & Trust Co., 601 F.Supp. 630, 638-39 (E.D.N.Y.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Henrietta Faye Ell
See, e.g., Wood v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 637 F.2d 1188, 1194 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 142 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); Virgin Islands v. Edinborough, 625 F.2d 472, 474 (3d Cir.1980); United States v. Warren, 578 F.2d at 1076 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clarence Samuel Robinson (80-5479), James Harold Coldiron (80-5480), Charles T. Cornett (80-5481)
See, e.g., United States v. Reed, 647 F.2d 678 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 142 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); United States v. Vinson, 606 F.2d 149 (6th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1074 , 100 S.Ct. 1020 , 62 L.Ed.2d 756 (1980); United States v. Enright, 579 F.2d 980 (6th Cir.1978).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert D.H. Richardson
(6×)
See also United States v. Becton, 632 F.2d 1294, 1297 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 141 , 70 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981). .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Lydon v. Justices of the Boston Municipal Court
(6×)
See, e.g., United States v. Becton, 632 F.2d 1294 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 141 , 70 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Richard Warner, Michael Charles Ward
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Reed, 647 F.2d 678, 689 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 142 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); United States v. Bright, 630 F.2d 804, 813 (5th Cir. 1980). 31 Warner argues that he was prejudiced by the "spillover" effect of evidence against his three codefendants concerning transactions in which he was not involved.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick Sangmeister
(4×)
Compare United States v. Becton, 632 F.2d 1294, 1295 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 141 , 70 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981) (hung jury may not reflect insufficient evidence but merely independence of jury).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Derrell Darnell Hamilton
See also United States v. Reed, 647 F.2d 678, 686 (6th Cir.), cert. denied 454 U.S. 837 , 102 S.Ct. 142 , 70 L.Ed.2d 118 (1981); United States v. Weidman, 572 F.2d 1199 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 439 U.S. 821 , 99 S.Ct. 87 , 58 L.Ed.2d 113 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Malmstedt
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 80-2187.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.