green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1984 ·
…the issue of who has prevailed is a realistic judgment, not a technical one
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Insurance Co. of North America v. United States
But cf., Rochez Brothers, Inc. v. Rhodes, 527 F.2d 880 (3d Cir.1975) (Rochez II) and Gould v. American-Hawaiian Steamship Co., 535 F.2d 761, 779 (3d Cir.1976) with Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175 (3d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Devine v. Sutermeister
the issue of who has prevailed is a realistic judgment, not a technical one
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Devine v. Sutermeister
the issue of who has prevailed is a realistic judgment, not a technical one
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stover, Daniel
See, United States v. DiLapi, 651 F.2d 140 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 1428, 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Coopers & Lybrand
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Id.; see Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 186 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Fermin, Hector Fermin, and Freddy Fermin
See United States v. DiLapi, 651 F.2d 140, 146-47 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. McKinney
See Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 70 F.R.D. 544, 547 (E.D.Pa.1976), aff 'd 649 F.2d 175 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Adams v. Hyannis Harborview, Inc.
See Id. at 35 , quoting Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 180-84 (3d Cir.1981) cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Jiffy Lube Securities Litigation
See Sharp v. Coopers & Lyhrand, 649 F.2d 175 (3rd Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); Worlds of Wonder Securities Litigation, [1989-90 Transfer Binder] Fed.Sec.L.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Eckstein v. Balcor Film Investors
See Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 187-89 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., 646 F.2d 271, 284 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1092 , 102 S.Ct. 658 , 70 L.Ed.2d 631 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blue Sky L. Rep. P 73,224, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,955 Cascade Energy and Metals Corporation, a Nevada Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Jeffrey G. Banks, Kenneth Caldwell, Coastal Computer Investments, a California Partnership, Elmer J. Davis, Harmatz and Hodowski, a California Partnership, David G. Henry, Roger A. Mann, H.E. Moses, Robert A. Nickerson, Peter P. Samarin, Herbert W. Stoltenberg, Edwin Stoltenberg, Chris Waugh, Samuel Harmatz, Bernard Hodowski, Patricia Stoltenberg, Mann Caldwell Partnership, a Partnership, Delford R. Ashley, George Slater, Patricia Slater, Robert Doub, Sam Hambarian, Alyce Hambarian, Lionel Ascher, A.C. Nejedly, R.E. Donahey, Grace v. Duncan and Elliot Weinberg, Cross-Appellees. Jeffery G. Banks, Kenneth Caldwell, Coastal Computer Investments, a California Partnership, Elmer J. Davis, Harmatz and Hodowski, a California Partnership, David G. Henry, Roger A. Mann, Mann Caldwell Partnership, H.E. Moses, Robert A. Nickerson, Peter P. Samarin, Patricia Stoltenberg, Herbert W. Stoltenberg, Edwin Stoltenberg, Chris Waugh, Delford R. Ashley, George Slater, Patricia Slater, Robert Doub, Sam Hambarian, Alyce Hambarian, Lionel Ascher, A.C. Nejedly, R.E. Donahey, Grace v. Duncan, Elliot Weinberg, Bernard Hodowski and Samuel Harmatz, Counterclaimants, Crossclaimants, Cross-Counterdefendants, Cross-Appellees v. Cascade Energy and Metals Corporation, Counterdefendant, Cross-Counterclaimant, Crossclaim and W. David Weston, Telegraph Mine Limited, a Partnership, Rex Montis Silver Co., Telegraph Mine Joint Venture, Gold Technics, Ltd., a Limited Partnership, Interphase Corp., James F. Peters, as Trustee of the Gnolaum Unitrust, Cross-Counterclaimants, Cross-Defendants, Crossclaim Cross-Appellants. Harold Masunaga, Marion Harada, Ukio Ayabe, Lyle Muller, Charles Higashi, Joseph Green, and William Ohara, Amici Curiae
See Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 189-91 (3d Cir.1981) (investors in tax shelter could recover damages for fraud including damages associated with fraudulently promised tax benefits), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982), overruled on other grounds, In re Data Access Systems Securities Litigation, 843 F.2d 1537, 1550 (3d Cir.) (en banc) (implicitly overruling Sharp on statute-of-limitations issue), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 131 , 102 L.Ed.2d 103 (1988); but cf. Randall v. Loftsgaarden, 478 U.S. 647, 666-67 , 106 S.Ct. 3143, 3154-55 , 92 L…
discussed
Cited "see"
Cascade Energy & Metals Corp. v. Banks
See Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 189-91 (3d Cir.1981) (investors in tax shelter could recover damages for fraud including damages associated with fraudulently promised tax benefits), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982), overruled on other grounds, In re Data Access Systems Securities Litigation, 843 F.2d 1537, 1550 (3d Cir.) (en banc) (implicitly overruling Sharp on statute-of-limitations issue), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 131 , 102 L.Ed.2d 103 (1988); but cf. Randall v. Loftsgaarden, 478 U.S. 647, 666-67 , 106 S.Ct. 3143, 3154-55 , 92 L.Ed.…
cited
Cited "see"
Evelyn Marino v. Juan U. Ortiz
See United States v. DiLapi, 651 F.2d 140 , 144 n. 2 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mccarter v. Mitcham
See Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); Biggans v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc., 638 F.2d 605 (3d Cir.1980); Roberts v. Magnetic Metals Co., 611 F.2d 450 (3d Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
McCarter v. Mitcham
See Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); Biggans v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc., 638 F.2d 605 (3d Cir.1980); Roberts v. Magnetic Metals Co., 611 F.2d 450 (3d Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jaroslawicz v. Engelhard Corp.
Accord, Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 190 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1986); Glick v. Campagna, 613 F.2d 31, 36 (3d Cir.1979). *299 Engelhard argues that the jury should not award a "lump-sum" amount for the entire class.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wayne S. Dakins
See, United States v. DiLapi, 651 F.2d 140 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 1428, 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Levasseur, Carol Ann Manning, Thomas William Manning, Barbara Curzi-Laaman, Richard Charles Williams, Jaan Karl Laaman
See United States v. DiLapi, 651 F.2d 140, 146-47 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Norwest Bank Midland v. Shinnick
See Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 188 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982) (trial court should determine the most reasonable placement of the burden of proof, with the plaintiff traditionally assuming the burden of demonstrating causation and with only unusual circumstances causing a shift in the burden from the plaintiff to the defendant), cited with approval in Austin, 675 F.2d at 178 n. 21.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos Bienuenido Cruz, Roberto Cruz, Stephen Cruz, Teresa Irwin, Phillip Warren Jones, Dave Thomas, and Arthur Liggins Strong
See United States v. DiLapi, 651 F.2d 140, 146-47 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); United States v. Ross, 626 F.2d 77, 80-81 (9th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barney Earl Crutchfield v. Louie L. Wainwright, Jim Smith
(2×)
See United States v. DiLapi, 651 F.2d 140, 147-49 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Korwek v. Hunt
See id. at 609-10 ; accord Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 191-92 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paul D. Johnson v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, D.C. Howard L. Eighmey v. Bechtel Civil and Minerals, Inc. Calvin Walker v. Bechtel Civil and Minerals, Inc. John Warren Clanagan v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, D.C. Paul D. Johnson v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, D.C. Calvin Walker and Rena Walker v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, D.C. John Warren Clanagan v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, D.C. Howard L. Eighmey v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, D.C. Stanley Wilmes v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, D.C. Paul D. Johnson v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, D.C. James H. Buchanan and Shirley Buchanan, His Wife v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, D.C. Stanley Wilmes v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, D.C. Calvin Walker v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. John Warren Clanagan v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation, D.C. Howard L. Eighmey v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. Glenwood Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
See Part III infra 15 Ostrer v. United States, 584 F.2d 594, 598 (2d Cir.1978) 16 United States v. DiLapi, 651 F.2d 140, 144 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982) 17 Id 18 See Part III infra. Mere consideration of such a motion does not impede the District Court's exercise of jurisdiction.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bull v. American Bank and Trust Co. of Pa.
See Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175 (3d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); Biggans v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc., 638 F.2d 605 (3d Cir.1980); Roberts v. Magnetic Metals Company, 611 F.2d 450 (3d Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Hill v. Equitable Bank, National Ass'n
See Sharp v. *1082 Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 193 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Grossman v. Waste Management, Inc.
Accord, Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 188 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Hill v. Equitable Trust Co.
See Sharp v. Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 185 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982). 33 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Austin v. Loftsgaarden
See Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 189 (3d Cir. 1981), cert. denied,--U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462, 476 (5th Cir. 1981), petition for cert. filed,-U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 1424 , 71 L.Ed.2d 646 (1981); St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,731, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,628, 10 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 252 Dr. Roger E. Austin, Dr. Thomas W. Anderson, Dr. Myrel A. Neumann and Dr. William C. Randall, and Cross v. B. J. Loftsgaarden Alotel Incorporated, a Minnesota Corporation M. S. Noah Lyman H. Coult Property Development & Research Company, a Minnesota Corporation and 2361 Building Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, and Cross
See Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 189 (3d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d ---- (1982); Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462, 476 (5th Cir. 1981), petition for cert. filed, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1424 , 71 L.Ed.2d ---- (1981); St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Synchronoss Securities Litigation
See, e.g., Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175 (3d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); Coleco Indus., Inc. v. Berman, 567 F.2d 569 (3d Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 , reh’g denied, 439 U.S. 998 , 99 S.Ct. 601 , 58 L.Ed.2d 671 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Intelligroup Securities Litigation
See, e.g., Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); Coleco Indus., Inc. v. Berman, 567 F.2d 569 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 106 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 , reh’g denied, 439 U.S. 998 , 99 S.Ct. 601 , 58 L.Ed.2d 671 (1978). 34 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Rent-Way Securities Litigation
See Rochez Bros., Inc. v. Rhoades, 527 F.2d 880, 890 (3d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 993 , 96 S.Ct. 2205 , 48 L.Ed.2d 817 (1976) (“secondary liability cannot be found under Section 20(a) unless it can be shown that the defendant was a culpable participant in the fraud.”); see also Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 185 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tse v. Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.
Out-of-pocket losses are the standard measure of damages for a 10b-5 claim, and are defined as: “the difference between the fair value of all that the seller received and the fair value of what he would have received had there been no fraudulent conduct.” Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. U.S., 406 U.S. 128, 155 , 92 S.Ct. 1456 , 31 L.Ed.2d 741 (1972); see also Sharp v. Coopers & Lyb-rand, 649 F.2d 175, 190 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. Philadelphia Housing Authority
See e.g., Coen v. Harrison County School Bd., 638 F.2d 24 , 26 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied. 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 647 (1982) (holding plaintiff not “prevailing party” because lawsuit was not necessary to relief).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ernest P. Kline v. First Western Government Securities, Inc.
See also Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 184 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982) (recognizing securities fraud claim against accounting firm based on materially false representations contained in opinion letter). 36 These cases leave no doubt concerning the existence of a cause of action for knowing or reckless misrepresentations in opinion letters.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kline v. First Western Government Securities, Inc.
See also Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 184 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982) (recognizing securities fraud claim against accounting firm based on materially false representations contained in opinion letter).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blaushild v. Grodin, Chotiner & Balmuth
See, e.g., Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 457 F.Supp. 879, 888 (E.D.Pa.1978), aff'd, 649 F.2d 175 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); see also, Wilder, et al. v. Williams, et al., 1989 WL 67821 (W.D.Pa.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,874 First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. And Jack K. Naber v. Roy I. Pring and Central Bank and Trust Company of Denver
See, e.g., Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 185 (3d Cir.1981) (§ 20(a) requires “ ‘culpable participation’ in the securities violation”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); Carpenter v. Harris, Upham & Co., 594 F.2d 388, 394 (4th Cir.) (controlling person must “in some meaningful sense [be a] culpable participant[] in the acts perpetrated by the controlled person”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 868 , *898 100 S.Ct. 143 , 62 L.Ed.2d 93 (1979); Lanza v. Drexel & Co., 479 F.2d 1277, 1299 (2d Cir.1973) (en banc) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kaser v. Swann
Bradford & Co., 827 F.2d 718, 724 (11th Cir.1987) (the court must determine whether the “oral representations to the named plaintiffs varied materially from the misleading information alleged to have been disseminated generally as a result of the defendants’ common schemes”), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 959 , 108 S.Ct. 1220 , 99 L.Ed.2d 421 (1988); see also Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 70 F.R.D. 544, 548 (E.D.Pa.1976) (if the plaintiffs show “[t]he oral statements were nothing more than the means by which the written contents of defendant’s [prospectus] were conveyed to plaintiff” then c…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wiley v. Hughes Capital Corp.
Rochez Bros., Inc., 527 F.2d at 890 (citing Lanza v. Drexel & Co., 479 F.2d 1277, 1299 (2d Cir.1973)); see also Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 185 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); Gould, 535 F.2d at 780 ; Laven v. Flanagan, 695 F.Supp. 800, 809 (D.N.J.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opatz v. John G. Kinnard and Co., Inc.
In re Atlantic Financial Management, Inc., 784 F.2d 29, 35 (1st Cir.1986); Henricksen v. Henricksen, 640 F.2d 880, 887 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 454 U.S. 1097 , 102 S.Ct. 669 , 70 L.Ed.2d 637 (1981); Paul F. Newton & Co. v. Texas Commerce Bank, 630 F.2d 1111, 1118-19 (5th Cir.1980); Marbury Management, Inc. v. Kohn, 629 F.2d 705, 712-16 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1011 , 101 S.Ct. 566 , 66 L.Ed.2d 469 (1980); Securities and Exchange Commission v. Management Dynamics, Inc., 515 F.2d 801 , 811-13 (2nd Cir.1975); Kerbs v. Fall River Industries, Inc., 502 F.2d 731, 740-41 (10th Cir.1974); Jo…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bastian v. Petren Resources Corp.
See, e.g., Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175 (3d Cir.1981) (where misinformation provided by defendant results in plaintiff paying too much, or receiving too little for his stock, “loss causation” exists), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ferreri v. First Options of Chicago, Inc.
See also Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 191-92 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982); Penturelli v. Spector, Cohen, Gadon & Rosen, 640 F.Supp. 868, 871 (E.D.Pa.1986) Section 1-501 only gives the sellers or buyers of securities the right to sue the person purchasing or selling the security.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fireison v. Pearson
(2×)
On that date "[j]urisdiction return[ed] to the tribunal to which the mandate [was] directed, for such proceedings as may be appropriate. . . ." Johnson v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corp., D.C., supra, 255 U.S.App.D.C. at 201 , 801 F.2d at 415 ; see also United States v. DiLapi, 651 F.2d 140, 144 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John M. Mudd v. United States
(2×)
Compare United States v. DiLapi, 651 F.2d 140, 148 (2d Cir.1981) (apparently applying an "actual prejudice" standard), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982), and Redman, 657 F.2d at 24 (requiring defendant to show that he was "deprived" of right to counsel), with Conway, 632 F.2d at 644-45 (5th Cir.), and Bryant, 545 F.2d at 1036 (6th Cir.) (apparently applying a per se reversal rule).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Audrey L. Commerford v. Ronald O. Olson, Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
(2×)
Rochez Brothers, Inc. v. Rhoades, 527 F.2d at 886 ; see also Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 180 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Harrisburg v. Bradford Trust Co.
See also, Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 186 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin Eisenberg and Arthur Nissen, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Frederick M. Gagnon, Bernard A. Boyers, David E. Wasserstrom, Charles Lieberman, Edward Hershenhorn, David Weinstein, John W. Pelino, Morris L. Chucas, Tom P. Monteverde, Wasserstrom & Chucas, and Pelino, Wasserstrom, Chucas & Monteverde, P.C. v. Gelrod, Fox and Co., Clarence Rainess & Co., Seidman and Seidman, Gruntal and Co., Marvin Welsch and Jack Panich. Appeal of Martin Eisenberg and Arthur Nissen, in Nos. 84-1214 & 84-1225. Appeal of David E. Wasserstrom, in No. 84-1261
(2×)
See also Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand, 649 F.2d 175, 184-85 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Victor Peterson
See also United States v. DiLapi, 651 F.2d 140, 146 (2 Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982), which distinguished Gipson on the basis that the judge in that case had affirmatively told the jury that they need not all agree on which one of several specified acts the defendants had committed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eisenberg v. Gagnon
(2×)
See also Sharp v. Coopers & Lyb-rand, 649 F.2d 175, 184-85 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 938 , 102 S.Ct. 1427 , 71 L.Ed.2d 648 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Coopers & Lybrand
v.
Sharp
v.
Sharp
No. 81-433.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (2)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.