green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Marisa Lemm, United States of America v. Phyllis Ellen Stonys, United States of America v. Val Bolton Maghee
(2×)
Delph v. United States and Hawkins v. United States, 439 U.S. 953 , 99 S.Ct. 349 , 58 L.Ed.2d 344 (1978); but see United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1191-95 (5th Cir. 1981) (explaining Elliott ), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 and sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
Bonton v. Archer Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 , 1187 n. 4 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 991, 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 1617, 71 L.Ed.2d 663 , 852 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Lamar Faulkner, Spencer H. Blain, Jr., James L. Toler and Arthur Formann
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 , 1190 n. 6 (5th Cir.1981) ("A strong argument can be made that a variance between a single conspiracy indictment and evidence of multiple conspiracies should be treated not as a 'variance' problem at all, but rather as a 'mis-joinder' question under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8(b).”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982). 22 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond James Nelson
See White at 717 (citing United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1203 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Boylan
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1189, 1194 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Boylan, United States of America v. John E. Carey, United States of America v. Thomas J. Connolly, United States of America v. Matthew A. Kilroe, United States of America v. John F. McCormick United States of America v. Kenneth J. Nave, United States of America v. Francis X. Sheehan
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1189, 1194 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
51 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1640, 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,576, 29 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1358 Willie Lewis Sherman v. Burke Contracting, Inc., and William E. Burke
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1200 (5th Cir. Unit A Sept.1981) ("Recordings must be excluded only if the inaudible or unintelligible portions 'are so substantial as to render the recording as a whole untrustworthy,' and that determination 'is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge.' " (quoting United States v. Mendoza, 574 F.2d 1373, 1378 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 584 , 58 L.Ed.2d 661 (1978))), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982). 14 27 Burke's second claim is that the recording was hearsay.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sherman v. Burke Contracting, Inc.
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1200 (5th Cir. Unit A Sept. 1981) (“Recordings must be excluded only if the inaudible or unintelligible portions ‘are so substantial as to render the recording as a whole untrustworthy,’ and that determination ‘is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge.’ ” (quoting United States v. Mendoza, 574 F.2d 1373, 1378 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 988 , 99 S.Ct. 584 , 58 L.Ed.2d 661 (1978))), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982). 14 Burke’s second claim is that the recording was hearsay.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stanford Champion, Gene Slusser, Eldon L. Morgan, Jr., Lester Spainhoward, Jr.
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 (5th Cir. Unit A Sept. 1981) 16 (evidence of a common conspirator and similar objectives insufficient to support finding of single conspiracy), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David Bruun and Ronald Berkovitz
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 , 1190 n. 6 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 991, 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 1617, 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Erwin
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 , 1189 n. 5 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982). 18 The court may decide, as a matter of law, that the evidence fails to raise a factual question for the jury.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Erwin
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 ,1189 n. 5 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sam Qaoud Evan H. Callanan, Sr. Evan H. Callanan, Jr.
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1198 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982); United States v. Robinson, 763 F.2d 778, 785 (6th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arturo Rodriguez, Vincente Ramirez
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1195-96 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981) cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul Santo
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1189-93 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982); United States v. Elliott, 571 F.2d 880, 902-03 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 953 , 99 S.Ct. 349 , 58 L.Ed.2d 344 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alcorn County, Mississippi v. U.S. Interstate Supplies, Inc.
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1186 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 1617, 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982). 15 The testimony of Cutchens, if believed by the jury, establishes that she, Creditor and USIS through the commission of these acts, constituting a pattern of racketeering activity, participated in an “enterprise” which affected interstate commerce.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Anthony White
See United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1203 (5th Cir.1981) (challenge to evidence through another witness or prior inconsistent statements insufficient to establish prosecutorial use of false testimony), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See United States v. Mammoth Oil Co., 14 F.2d 705, 717, 731 (8th Cir.1926), aff'd, 275 U.S. 13 , 48 S.Ct. 1 , 72 L.Ed. 137 (1927) (unnecessary to have direct evidence of bribes); see also United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1186-89 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alicio M. Sanchez (89-2432) and Reinaldo Cubilla (89-2433)
United States v. Davenport, 808 F.2d 1212 (6th Cir.1987); United States v. Warner, 690 F.2d 545 (6th Cir.1982); see also United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Local 560, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181, 1191-95 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982); United States v. Diecidue, 603 F.2d 535, 553-55 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 946 , 100 S.Ct. 1345 , 63 L.Ed.2d 781 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clarence Samuel Robinson (80-5479), James Harold Coldiron (80-5480), Charles T. Cornett (80-5481)
See also United States v. Sutherland, 656 F.2d 1181 , 1200 n. 15 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 1451 , 71 L.Ed.2d 663 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Avedisian
v.
Hubbard
v.
Hubbard
No. 81-1269.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1982.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.