green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Oy Wartsila AB
See Miskow v. Boeing Co., 664 F.2d 205, 207 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Westchester Radiological Associates P.C. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc.
Courts have consistently held that this “ban on balance billing” does not unreasonably restrain trade; the only restraint is the one that flows inevitably and properly from the choice by the insurer to buy services and products of a particular type from doctors and pharmacies, i.e., fully-paid services and products. 6 Medical Arts, 675 F.2d 502 (Blue Shield may require pharmacies to accept Blue Shield payments as full reimbursement for drugs sold to Blue Shield subscribers); *712 Kartell v. Blue Cross of Massachusetts, Inc., 749 F.2d 922 (1st Cir.1984) (Blue Shield may require doctors to a…
discussed
Cited "see"
Royal Drug Company, Inc., Etc. v. Group Life and Health Insurance Co., Etc., Group Life and Health Insurance Co., Etc. v. Royal Drug Company, Inc., Etc.
Accord Quality Auto Body, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 660 F.2d 1195 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982); Glen Eden Hospital, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, Inc., 555 F.Supp. 337, 344 (E.D.Mich.1983). 26 For these reasons, the district court's judgment is 27 AFFIRMED. 1 A state court has held a prescription drug insurance program to be per se violative of federal and state antitrust laws.
discussed
Cited "see"
Royal Drug Co. v. Group Life & Health Insurance
Accord Quality Auto Body, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 660 F.2d 1195 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982); Glen Eden Hospital, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Michigan, Inc., 555 F.Supp. 337, 344 (E.D.Mich.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Glen Eden Hospital, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
See Quality Auto Body, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Company, 660 F.2d 1195 (7th Cir.1981), cert. den. 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982), and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Aluminum Corporation, a California Corporation v. Kawneer Co., Inc., a Corporation
See, Miskow v. Boeing Co., 664 F.2d 205, 207 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982); 15 Wright, Miller & Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure, Jurisdiction § 3847 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mayor of Columbus v. Clark-Dietz & Associates-Engineers, Inc.
See Miller v. City of Broken Arrow, Okla., 660 F.2d 450 (10 Cir.1981), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982). *626 Basic also asserts that despite our finding that its poor workmanship and use of improper soil materials in the levee was partly responsible for the necessity of a second slurry wall, Clark-Dietz should bear full responsibility.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charlie McGee and Cross-Appellee v. Equicor-Equitable Hca Corporation, and Equicor Health Plan, Inc., and Cross-Appellants
We arrive at this conclusion “because we can affirm on any grounds that find support in the record,” Colorado Flying Academy, Inc. v. United States, 724 F.2d 871, 880 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1182 , 106 S.Ct. 2915 , 91 L.Ed.2d 544 (1986), “even where the [district] court reached its conclusions from a different or even erroneous course of reasoning.” Cayce v. Carter Oil Co., 618 F.2d 669, 677 (10th Cir.1980); see also Miller v. City of Broken Arrow, Okl., 660 F.2d 450 , 456 *1199 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carlson
See also Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310, 316 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indian Country, U.S.A., Inc. v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission
Although this issue was apparently not raised in Cabazon, the bingo games there were characterized as “operated by non-Indian professional operators, who receive a percentage of the profits.” Cabazon, 783 F.2d at 901 ; see also Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310, 311 (5th Cir.1981) (tribe contracted with private limited partnership to build and operate bingo hall on Indian reservation in exchange for percentage of profits as management fees), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indian Country v. State of Oklahoma
Although this issue was apparently not raised in Cabazon, the bingo games there were characterized as "operated by non-Indian professional operators, who receive a percentage of the profits." Cabazon, 783 F.2d at 901 ; see also Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310, 311 (5th Cir.1981) (tribe contracted with private limited partnership to build and operate bingo hall on Indian reservation in exchange for percentage of profits as management fees), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
49er Chevrolet, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation, Etc.
The Court has stated: “Even where a single firm’s restraints directly affect prices and have the same economic effect as concerted action might have, there can be no liability under § 1 in the absence of agreement.” Id.; see also Quality Auto Body, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 660 F.2d 1195, 1200 (7th Cir.1981) (“no liability can be predicated on Section 1 in the absence of some type of concerted action”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982); Edward J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Ex Rel. May v. Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma
See e.g., Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Butter-worth, 491 F.Supp. 1015, 1019 [S.D.Fla.1980], cert, denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 [1982]; Oneida Tribe of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin, 518.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moapa Band of Paiute Indians, a Chartered Indian Tribe v. United States Department of Interior, an Agency of the Government of the United States
Compare Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians v. Duffy, 694 F.2d 1185 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 929 , 103 S.Ct. 2091 , 77 L.Ed.2d 301 (1983) (state law regulates bingo, so bingo not forbidden to Indians by ACA) and Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth, 658 F.2d 310 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1020 , 102 S.Ct. 1717 , 72 L.Ed.2d 138 (1982) (same) with Marcyes, 557 F.2d at 1364 (although state law allows limited use of fireworks it is essentially prohibitory and so applies to Indian reservation via ACA) and United States v. Farris, 624 F.2d 890 (9th Cir.1980)…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rehberger
v.
Darnell
v.
Darnell
No. 81-1410.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 1982.
Published
App. Ct. Ill., 5th Dist. Certiorari denied.