green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Quinton Bowen v. State of Tennessee
(2×)
After noting that the Supreme Court was remanding an appeal from a mixed petition to this Court for “further consideration” in light of Rose , the dissent stated: Under Rose v, Lundy — if I read the Court’s opinion correctly — after the case gets back to the District Court that court must dismiss the habeas corpus petition that is now a part of the record. 102 S.Ct. at 2028, footnote omitted (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Joseph Niziolek, Jr. v. Michael Ashe
We note that in Justice Stevens’ dissent in Bergman, he states that “[njothing in the Court’s opinion in Rose v. Lundy or in anything the Court has written since, justifies the Court’s reaching out on its own initiative to apply its new rule to previously decided cases.” - U.S. at -, n. 4, 102 S.Ct. at 2028, n. 4 (Stevens, J., dissenting). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
Brogdon v. Alabama Department of Economic & Community Affairs
See Terrell v. United States Pipe & Foundry Co., 644 F.2d 1112, 1122 (5th Cir.1981), rev’d on other grounds, 456 U.S. 955 , 102 S.Ct. 2028 , 72 L.Ed.2d 479 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO
v.
Terrell
v.
Terrell
No. 81-1029.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 3, 1982.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Pullman-Standard v. Swint, ante, p. 273.