green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Interest Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation
See McCready, 457 U.S. at 480-84 , 102 S.Ct. 25 .40 (class of healthcare consumers had standing to challenge group health plan’s exclusion of psychologists, not psychiatrists; consumers “within that area of the economy” were endangered by the “breakdown' of competitive conditions” and alleged an injury that “was inextricably intertwined with the injury the conspirators sought to inflict” on the excluded competitors); In re DDAVP Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig,, 585 F.3d 677, 688-89 (2d Cir. 2009) (although defendants’ conduct targeted their competitors, direct purchasers of d…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Morris
See New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, 460 , 101 S.Ct. 2860, 2864 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768, 775 (1981), reh’g denied, 453 U.S. 950 , 102 S.Ct. 26 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1036 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Compton Corp. Ex Rel. Kellogg v. United States Department of Energy (In Re Compton Corp.)
See NLRB v. Amax Coal Co., 453 U.S. 322, 329 , 101 S.Ct. 2789, 2794 , 69 L.Ed.2d 672 , reh’g denied, 453 U.S. 950 , 102 S.Ct. 26 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1036 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ogburn
See New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 , 101 S.Ct. 2860 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 , reh'g denied, 453 U.S. 950 , 102 S.Ct. 26 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1036 (1981); State v. Padron, 425 So.2d 644 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), approved, 449 So.2d 811 (Fla. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robertson v. State
See also New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 , 101 S.Ct. 2860 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 , reh’g denied, 453 U.S. 950 , 102 S.Ct. 26 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1036 (1981); Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 110-11 , 100 S.Ct. 2556, 2564 , 65 L.Ed.2d 633, 645-46 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LaBriola
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. A-157 (81-453).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Sep 23, 1981.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Application for stay and/or recall of mandate, addressed to Justice Rehnquist and referred to the Court, denied.