Familia de Boom v. Arosa Mercantil, S. A., 454 U.S. 1022 (1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Familia de Boom v. Arosa Mercantil, S. A., 454 U.S. 1022 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest v. State (alaska, 2016-07-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest v. State (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Alaska · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Spokane Arcades, Inc. v. Brockett, 631 F.2d 135, 139 (Oth Cir, 1980), aff'd, 454 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 557 , 70 L.Ed.2d 468 (1981). .
discussed Cited "see" Resolution Trust Corp. v. California
C.D. Cal. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Spokane Arcades, Inc. v. Brockett, 631 F.2d 135, 139 (9th Cir.1980) (severability “would create a program quite different from the one ... actually adopted”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 557 , 70 L.Ed.2d 468 (1981). 19 Ill The California Act’s 25 degree rule estab­lishes a “labeling requirement” that is “in addition to, or different than” labeling re­quirements made under the PPIA.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." American Library Association, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Appellees/cross-Appellants (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Spokane Arcades, Inc. v. Brockett, 631 F.2d 135, 137-38 (9th Cir.1980), aff'd mem., 454 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 557 , 70 L.Ed.2d 468 (1981); United States v. Alexander, 736 F.Supp. 968, 974-75 (D.Minn.1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cosper v. Allred
N.D. Miss. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Brown v. Flowers Industries, Inc., 688 F.2d 328, 332 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1023 , 103 S.Ct. 1275 , 75 L.Ed.2d 496 (1983); see also Familia de Boom v. Arosa Mercantil, S.A., 629 F.2d 1134, 1138 (5th Cir.1980), rehearing denied, 454 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 557 , 70 L.Ed.2d 418 (1981); Product Promotions, Inc. v. Cousteau, 495 F.2d 483, 489 (5th Cir.1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Roger Fehlhaber v. State of North Carolina, Edward W. Grannis, District Attorney for the 12th Judicial District of North Carolina, Etc. (2×)
4th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Spokane Arcades, Inc. v. Brockett, 631 F.2d 135 (9th Cir. 1980) (relying on the Supreme Court decision in Vance to strike down a Washington state statute substantially similar to the North Carolina statute), summarily aff’d, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 557 , 70 L.Ed.2d 468 (1981); Universal Amusement Co. v. Vance, 587 F.2d 159 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), aff’d, 445 U.S. 308 , 100 S.Ct. 1156 , 63 L.Ed.2d 413 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Southern New Jersey Newspapers, Inc. v. State
D.N.J. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Spokane Arcades, Inc. v. Brockett, 631 F.2d 135, 137 (9th Cir. 1980), aff’d, 454 U.S. 1022 , 102 S.Ct. 557 , 70 L.Ed.2d 468 (1981); Zwickler v. Koota, 389 U.S. 241, 252 , 88 S.Ct. 391, 397 , 19 L.Ed.2d 444 (1967); Garvin v. Rosenau, supra, at 239; Hobbs v. Thompson, 448 F.2d 456, 462-63 (5th Cir. 1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Familia de Boom
v.
Arosa Mercantil, S. A.
No. 80-1322.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 2, 1981.
454 U.S. 1022
Con, Consideration, Motion, Took.
Published

451 U. S. 1008. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.

Justice O’Con-nor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.