green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Kitces v. Wood
See DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280, 284 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981); Database America v. BellSouth Advertising & Publishing Corp., 825 F.Supp. 1195 (D.N.J.1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Gapanovich v. Komori Corp.
See DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F. 2d 280, 288 (3rd Cir.1981), cert. den., 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed. 2d 620 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson Bros. Corp. v. Arrowhead Co.
(2×)
See Rostad v. On-Deck, Inc., 372 N.W.2d 717, 721 (Minn.) (quoting DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280, 285 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1006 , 106 S.Ct. 528 , 88 L.Ed.2d 460 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Koff v. Brighton Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Avdel Corp. v. Mecure, 58 N.J. 264, 268 , 277 A.2d 207, 209 (1971); see DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280, 284 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981); Alchemie International, Inc. v. Metal World, Inc., 523 F.Supp. 1039, 1042 (D.N.J.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jerry Armer and William Fetters v. The City of Salem, Ruth Mullnack, Beulah Chafin, Raymond D. Weaver, Dan Eudy, and Russell Miller
See Amaan v. City of Eureka, 615 S.W.2d 414 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1084 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 619 (1981); Pumphrey v. City of Lutesville, 707 S.W.2d 475 (Mo.Ct.App.1986); State ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Hantover, Inc. v. Omet, S.N.C. of Volentieri & C.
See DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280, 289 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981). 11 .
cited
Cited "see"
Nordberg v. Granfinanciera, S.A. (In re Chase & Sanborn Corp.)
Accord De-James v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 491 F.Supp. 1276, 1281 (D.N.J.1980), aff'd, 654 F.2d 280 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Chase & Sanborn Corp.
Accord DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 491 F.Supp. 1276, 1281 (D.N.J.1980), aff'd, 654 F.2d 280 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981). 22 In sum, the statutory and constitutional concerns are satisfied; both the bankruptcy and district court properly exercised in personam jurisdiction over Granfinanciera and Medex.
cited
Cited "see"
Loughridge v. Overnite Transp. Co.
See Dake v. Tuell, 687 S.W.2d 191, 193 (Mo.1985), citing Amaan v. City of Eureka, 615 S.W.2d 414 (Mo. banc 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1084 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 619 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Educational Testing Service v. Katzman
See DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280, 283, 284 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
Helten v. Arthur J. Evers Corp.
See DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280, 285 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Max Daetwyler Corp., a New York Corporation v. R. Meyer, a West German Corporation. Appeal of Rolf Meyer
See Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co., 556 F.2d 406, 416-18 (9th Cir.1977). 40 In DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280 , 286 n. 3 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981), we accepted for purposes of argument that "if service can be made by wholly federal means," aggregate contacts with the United States might be considered.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sousa v. Ocean Sunflower Shipping Co., Ltd.
See DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280, 285 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981); American President Lines, Ltd. v. Metropolitan Stevedore Services, 567 F.Supp. 169, 171 (W.D.Wash.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Quentin Hedrick v. Daiko Shoji Co., Ltd., Osaka, and Pine Oak Shipping, S.A.
See DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280, 290-93 (3d Cir.) (Gibbons, J., dissenting), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Carty v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
See DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
James Carty, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rita Davis Connor, Deceased, on Behalf of the Estate, Heirs and Survivors of Said Decedent, and Cornelius Dupie, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maymond Dupie, Deceased, on Behalf of the Estate, Heirs and Survivors of Said Decedent, and Sadie Burnett Smith, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Smith, Deceased, on Behalf of the Estate, Heirs and Survivors of Said Decedent, and Elkin Alfred Carty, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Virgile Clementina Carty, Deceased, on Behalf of the Estate, Heirs and Survivors of Said Decedent v. Beech Aircraft Corporation, a Corporation Avco-Lycoming, a Corporation the Bendix Corporation, a Corporation and Herman Lloyd, as the Personal Representative of Clayton Lloyd, Deceased, D/B/A Valley Air Service. Lena Lloyd, as Personal Representative of Clayton Lloyd, Deceased v. Beech Aircraft Corporation, Avco-Lycoming and the Bendix Corporation, Beech Aircraft Corporation, Avco-Lycoming and the Bendix Corporation
See DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warfield v. Alaniz
See, e.g., DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280, 284 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981) (provision authorizing nationwide service of process in federal question case, obviates the need to rely on a long-arm statute for authorization of service of process); Int’l Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 593 F.2d 166 , 175 n. 5 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2884 , 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979) (finding that principles of pendent jurisdiction allow a district court to consider state-law claims where a *1129 “Section 27” 8 claim is alleg…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weber v. Jolly Hotels
R. 4:4-4(c)(1); see also DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280 , 284 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981); Doumani v. Casino Control Comm’n, 614 F.Supp. 1465, 1471 (D.N.J.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. M/V Santa Clara I
See, e.g., Lake Shore, 886 F.2d at 657 n. 2 (citing DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280, 288 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981) and Burstein v. State Bar of California, 693 F.2d 511, 514-17 (5th Cir.1982)); see also Honeywell, Inc. v. Metz Apparatewerke, 509 F.2d 1137 (7th Cir.1975); Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co., 556 F.2d 406 (9th Cir.1977); Ingersoll Milling Mach.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Percy Green, Ii v. St. Louis Housing Authority
See, e.g., Amaan v. City of Eureka, 615 S.W.2d 414, 415 (Mo. banc 1981) (in absence of a contract for employment for definite term or contrary statutory provision, a public employer may discharge an employee at any time, without cause or reason, and in such cases no action can be obtained for wrongful discharge), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1084 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 619 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Green v. St. Louis Housing Authority
See, e.g., Amaan v. City of Eureka, 615 S.W.2d 414, 415 (Mo. banc 1981) (in absence of a contract for employment for definite term or contrary statutory provision, a public employer may discharge an employee at any time, without cause or reason, and in such cases no action can be obtained for wrongful discharge), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1084 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 619 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Starline Optical Corp. v. Caldwell
See World-Wide Volkswagen, 444 U.S. at 297 , 100 S.Ct. at 567 (asking whether “the defendant’s conduct and connection with the forum state are such that he should reasonably anticipate being haled into court there”); see also DeJames v. Magnificence Carriers, Inc., 654 F.2d 280, 286 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1085 , 102 S.Ct. 642 , 70 L.Ed.2d 620 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Amaan
v.
City of Eureka, Missouri
v.
City of Eureka, Missouri
No. 81-648.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 30, 1981.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.