green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.3 score
“evidence should not be excluded for violation of the statute's provisions where no constitutional right is involved.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Barker
evidence should not be excluded for violation of the statute's provisions where no constitutional right is involved.
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Aliya M.
Rather, because "[t]he exclusionary rule generates substantial social costs" ( Hudson v. Michigan , __ US __, 126 SCt. 2159, 2163 [2006]; see , People v. Young , 55 NY2d 419, 425 [1982], cert. denied 459 US 848 [1992]; People v. Burr , 70 NY2d 354, 362 [1987], cert. denied 485 US 989 [1988]), exclusion of evidence is required only where there is a causal connection or nexus between the illegal conduct and the evidence in question ( see , People v. Burr , at 362-363 ; People v. Jones , at 241-242 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rhode
(2×)
See State v. Johnson, 318 N.W.2d 417, 438 (Iowa 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 848 , 103 S.Ct. 106 , 74 L.Ed.2d 95 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Noriega
See id. 35 To support count one, possession with intent to distribute one kilogram of cocaine, the government offered evidence that Noriega possessed the cocaine, expert testimony that quantities in amounts over one ounce are generally held for distribution, 4 evidence that two loaded guns were found in the motor home with the cocaine, 5 and evidence of Noriega's association with Simpson.
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Young
See State v. Johnson (Iowa 1982), 318 N.W.2d 417, 435 , cert. denied (1982), 459 U.S. 848 , 74 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Emerson
See State v. Johnson, 318 N.W.2d 417, 438 (Iowa 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 848 , 103 S.Ct. 106 , 74 L.Ed.2d 95 (1983) (in prosecution for murder of defendant’s son, evidence of defendant’s abuse of victim admissible to show “defendant’s prior relationship” with victim); State v. Hilleshiem, 305 N.W.2d 710, 714 (Iowa 1981) (evidence of victim’s prior injuries admissible as “circumstantial evidence bearing on defendant’s relationship” with victim); State v. O’Connell, 275 N.W.2d 197, 202 (Iowa 1979) (evidence of defendant’s prior assaults on victim as well as their quarr…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce Grant, Sr.
See Smith v. Bordenkircher, 671 F.2d 986 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 848 (1982). 10 Appellant argues that defense counsel had an actual conflict of interest.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Charles Poe
See, e.g., Smith v. Bordenkircher, 671 F.2d 986 , 986–87 (6th Cir.) (per curiam) (holding that "a lawyer representing two or more criminal defendants in a state trial [was not required to] withdraw as counsel for remaining defendants because of potential conflict of interest when one co-defendant turn[ed] state's evidence" because the district court's finding that no actual conflict of interest existed was not clearly erroneous), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 848 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Charles Poe, III
See, e.g., Smith v. Bordenkircher, 671 F.2d 986, 986-87 (6th Cir.) (per cu-riam) (holding that “a lawyer representing two or more criminal defendants in a state trial [was not required to] withdraw as counsel for remaining defendants because of potential conflict of interest when one co-defendant turnfed] state’s evidence” because the district court’s finding that no actual conflict of interest existed was not clearly erroneous), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 848 , 103 S.Ct. 107 , 74 L.Ed.2d 96 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wilbur D. Wilkinson
See, e.g., United States v. Hazeem, 679 F.2d 770, 772 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 848 , 103 S.Ct. 106 , 74 L.Ed.2d 95 (1982) (noting that misapplication does not require previous lawful possession).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wilbur Wilkinson
See, e.g., United States v. Hazeem, 679 F.2d 770, 772 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 848 (1982) (noting that misapplication does not require previous lawful possession).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Williams
As discussed above, such illegal detention does not compel this result (United States v Crews, supra; People v Pleasant, supra; see also, People v Young, 55 NY2d 419 , cert denied 459 US 848 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gilberto Silvas-Norzagaray
Id.; see also United States v. Hazeem, 679 F.2d 770, 773 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 848 (1982) (even if there was a variance between the amount of money that the defendant allegedly embezzled and the amount for which the defendant was ultimately found guilty, no prejudice existed because the indictment was sufficiently explicit to inform the defendant of the charges against him).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Garrow
See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 318 N.W.2d 417, 437 (Iowa 1982), cert. den., 459 U.S. 848 , 103 S.Ct. 106 , 74 L.Ed.2d 95 (“[W]e refuse to exclude relevant evidence by applying the exclusionary concept to conduct which is not of constitutional magnitude.”); see also United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 348 , 94 S.Ct. 613, 620 , 38 L.Ed.2d 561, 571 (1974) (application of rule usually restricted to areas where its remedial objectives “are thought most efficaciously served”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Fleming
See, e.g., State v. Johnson (Iowa 1982), 318 N.W.2d 417, 435 , cert. denied (1982), 459 U.S. 848 , 74 L.
Gadomski
v.
Common Pleas Court of Pennsylvania
v.
Common Pleas Court of Pennsylvania
No. 81-6830.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Washington (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.