green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Tharp v. Media General, Inc.
See Fitzgerald v. Penthouse Int’l, Ltd., 691 F.2d 666, 668 (4th Cir.1982) cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1024 , 103 S.Ct. 1277 , 75 L.Ed.2d 497 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Ray Lee Spillers v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
See Smith v. Wyrick, 693 F.2d 808, 810 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1024 , 103 S.Ct. 1277 , 75 L.Ed.2d 497 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Foretich v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.
Typically, we have combined the second and third requirements, to ask “whether the plaintiff ha[d] voluntarily assumed a role of special prominence in a public controversy by attempting to influence the outcome of the controversy.” Reuber, 925 F.2d at 709 (citing Fitzgerald, 691 F.2d at 668 ); see id. at 708 (holding that the plaintiff “voluntarily injected himself into a public controversy ‘in order to influence the resolution of the issues involved’ ” (quoting Gertz, 418 U.S. at 345 , 94 S.Ct. at 3009-10 )); see also Fitzgerald, v. Penthouse Int’l, Ltd., 525 F.Supp. 585, 593 (D…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Foretich v. Capital Cities/Abc, Inc.
Typically, we have combined the second and third requirements, to ask "whether the plaintiff ha[d] voluntarily assumed a role of special prominence in a public controversy by attempting to influence the outcome of the controversy." Reuber, 925 F.2d at 709 (citing Fitzgerald, 691 F.2d at 668 ); see id. at 708 (holding that the plaintiff "voluntarily injected himself into a public controversy 'in order to influence the resolution of the issues involved' " (quoting Gertz, 418 U.S. at 345 , 94 S.Ct. at 3009-10 )); see also Fitzgerald v. Penthouse Int'l, Ltd., 525 F.Supp. 585, 593 (D.Md.1981) (aski…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Giles
v.
Hunt
v.
Hunt
No. 82-6025.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1983.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.