green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Carodenuto v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
That is, clear statutory language should be applied as written unless "the literal words of the statute would bring about an end completely at variance with the purpose” of the statute (Aviation Consumer Action Project v Washburn, 535 F2d 101, 106-107 [DC Cir 1976]; see, United Mine Workers v Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commn., 671 F2d 615, 621 [DC Cir 1982], cert denied 459 US 927 ; Wilderness Socy. v Morton, 479 F2d 842, 855 [DC Cir 1973] [en banc], cert denied 411 US 917 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gatewood v. Washington Healthcare Corporation
See United Mine Workers of Am. v. Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Comm'n, 671 F.2d 615, 621 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 927 , 103 S.Ct. 239 , 74 L.Ed.2d 189 (1982); Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Washburn, 535 F.2d 101, 106-07 (D.C.Cir.1976). 2 Like the only other circuit court to address this question, see Cleland, 917 F.2d at 269-70 , we will give effect to the plain and inclusive terms of the Emergency Act. 16 Nevertheless, we affirm the District Court dismissal on the grounds that appellant has failed to state a cause of action under the Act.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gatewood v. Washington Healthcare Corp.
See United Mine Workers of Am. v. Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Comm’n, 671 F.2d 615, 621 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 927 , 103 S.Ct. 239 , 74 L.Ed.2d 189 (1982); Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Washburn, 535 F.2d 101, 106-07 (D.C.Cir.1976). 2 Like the only other circuit court to address this question, see Cleland, 917 F.2d at 269-70 , we will give effect to the plain and inclusive terms of the Emergency Act.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dorothy Salazar v. United States Air Force and Paul Thomas Byrne
See Shaw v. Shaw, 623 S.W.2d 148 (Tex.App. —Beaumont 1981, writ refd n.r.e.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 927 , 103 S.Ct. 238 , 74 L.Ed.2d 188 (1982) (periodic payments provided in contractual agreement between parties to divorce were not "alimony within the definition of 42 U.S.C. § 662 (c), even though the express purpose of those payments was "for support” of spouse; waiver of federal immunity from garnishment embodied in 42 U.S.C. § 659 therefore did not extend to actions to enforce the obligation to make such payments).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee v. Federal Election Commission
See e.g., United Mine Workers v. Federal Mine, 671 F.2d 615 , 621 (D.C.Cir., 1982) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 927 , 103 S.Ct. 239 , 74 L.Ed.2d 189 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jeffrey Thomas Bell
See also United States v. Barry, 673 F.2d 912 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 927 (1982); United States v. Andrews, 618 F.2d 646 (10th Cir. 1980); United States v. Rodriguez, 596 F.2d 169 (6th Cir. 1979). 11 On the facts here presented, we find ample and controlling authority for the district court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress.
Shaw
v.
Shaw
v.
Shaw
No. 81-6894.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1982.
Brennan, Certio, Rari, White.
Published
Ct. App. Tex., 9th Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Justice Brennan, Justice White, and Justice O’Connor would grant certio-rari.