green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
O'rourke v. Eastern Air Lines
See Franklin Mint Corp. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 690 F.2d 303 (2d Cir.1982), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3084 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1983) (cargo loss limitation of liability provision of Article 22 prospectively unenforceable because of fluctuating gold prices) 19 In Reed we held that airline employees are shielded by the liability limitation provision of the Warsaw Convention, as modified by the Montreal Agreement.
discussed
Cited "see"
O'Rourke v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
See Franklin Mint Corp. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 690 F.2d 303 (2d Cir.1982), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 3084 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1983) (cargo loss limitation of liability provision of Article 22 prospectively unenforceable because of fluctuating gold prices). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ben Reid v. United States of America, the State of Indiana, and Floyd County Commissioners, Bruce K. Lorch v. United States of America, State of Indiana, and Jefferson County Commissioners, Maurice C. And Mary F. Smith v. United States of America, Dorothy Winkler v. United States of America
See Tatum v. Regents of Nebraska--Lincoln, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3084 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1346 (1983) (award of damages against petitioner pursuant to Supreme Court rule allowing award of damages when appeal or petition for certiorari is frivolous). 22 The second determination that must be made is whether the case is an appropriate one for the imposition of sanctions.
discussed
Cited "see"
Reid v. United States
See Tatum v. Regents of Nebraska — Lincoln, -U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 3084 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1346 (1983) (award of damages against petitioner pursuant to Supreme Court rule allowing award of damages when appeal or petition for certiorari is frivolous).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Braley v. Campbell
(2×)
See, e.g., Tatum v. Regents of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 460 U.S. 1048 , 103 S.Ct. 1450 , 75 L.Ed.2d 804 , 462 U.S. 1117 , 103 S.Ct. 3084 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1346 (1983); see generally Martineau, Frivolous Appeals: The Uncertain Federal Response, 1984 Duke L.J. 845 , 875-77.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Braley v. Campbell
(2×)
See, e.g., Tatum v. Regents of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 460 U.S. 1048 , 103 S.Ct. 1450 , 75 L.Ed.2d 804 , 462 U.S. 1117 , 103 S.Ct. 3084 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1346 (1983); see generally Martineau, Frivolous Appeals: The Uncertain Federal Response, 1984 Duke L.J. 845 , 875-77.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Talamini, Administratrix of the Estate of Talamini v. Allstate Insurance Co.
(3×)
See, e.g., Tatum v. Regents of University of Nebraska, 462 U.S. 1117 , 103 S.Ct. 3084 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1346 (1983); Bohn v. Bohn, 316 U.S. 646, 647 , 62 S.Ct. 1283 , 86 L.Ed. 1730 (1942) ( per curiam ) ("it appearing that the appeal was frivolous and taken merely for delay"); Roe v. Kansas, 278 U.S. 191, 193 , 49 S.Ct. 160 , 73 L.Ed. 259 (1929); Slaker v. O'Connor, 278 U.S. 188, 190 , 49 S.Ct. 158, 159 , 73 L.Ed. 258 (1929); Wagner Electric Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Keith W. Atkinson, an Individual, and St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.
See also Tatum v. Regents of Nebraska, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 3084 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1346 (1983) (order invoking sanctions under Sup.Ct.R. 49.2); Brown v. United States, 741 F.2d 1374, 1377-78 (Fed.Cir.1984); Wright v. United States, 728 F.2d 1459 (Fed.Cir. 1984); Beachboard v. United States, 727 F.2d 1092 (Fed.Cir.1984); 28 U.S.C. §§ 1912 , 1927 (1982); FRAP 38.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tatum
v.
Regents of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
v.
Regents of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
No. 82-6145.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 13, 1983.
Brennan, Consideration, Deny, Marshall, Motion, Took.
Cited by 12 opinions | Published
460 U. S. 1048. Motion of re-
spondents for damages granted, and damages are awarded to respondents in the amount of $500 pursuant to this Court’s Rule 49.2. In all other respects, the motion is denied.
Justice Brennan, Justice Marshall, and Justice Stevens would deny the motion. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.