green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.7 score
“in actions brought pursuant to 42 u.s.c. 1983 , federal courts may indeed apply rules of state law to questions as to which congress has not provided clear guidance.”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Marc Feldman v. Allstate Insurance Company Vicki Weed
ejvidence obtained from a consensual wiretap conforming to 18 u.s.c. 2511 (2)(c) is admissible in federal court proceedings without regard to state law
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Golden State Transit Corp. v. City of Los Angeles
in actions brought pursuant to 42 u.s.c. 1983 , federal courts may indeed apply rules of state law to questions as to which congress has not provided clear guidance.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wei-Kang Zhou v. Pittsburg State University
See id. at 665-66 (citing United States v. Cormier, 220 F.3d 1103, 1111 (9th Cir.2000) and United States v. Adams, 694 F.2d 200 , 201 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S.Ct. 3085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1983)); see also Roberts v. Americable Int’l.
cited
Cited "see"
Integon Life Insurance v. Browning
See Hess v. Eddy, 689 F.2d 977, 1980 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S.Ct. 3085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence J. Kovac
(2×)
See United States v. Adams, 694 F.2d 200, 201-02 (9th Cir.1982) (evidence obtained by federal and state officials in conformance with federal wiretapping statute is admissible in federal prosecution without regard to state law), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S.Ct. 3085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1983); United States v. Daniel, 667 F.2d 783, 785 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (where federal agent was involved in state investigation and decision had been made prior to wiretap to present case to federal court rather than to state court for prosecution, evidence secured by wiretap in conformity with fede…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Rowell v. Walker Baptist Medical Center
(2×)
See also Hess v. Eddy, 689 F.2d 977, 980 (11th Cir.[1982]), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S.Ct. 3085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1982) (holding that the district court “erred in applying Alabama’s ‘no relation-back’ rule in the face of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure [17(a)] that expressly authorizes and adopts the ‘relation-back’ doctrine” in context of administration of estate and suit filed in federal court prior to administratrix receiving official representative status).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jeffrey Edward Wilson v. Navistar International
See also Hess v. Eddy, 689 F.2d 977, 980 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S. Ct. 3085 (1982) (holding that the district court "erred in applying Alabama's 'no relation-back' rule in the face of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure [17(a)] that expressly authorizes and adopts the 'relation-back' doctrine" in context of administration of estate and suit filed in federal court prior to administratrix receiving official representative status). 4 The relation back of an amendment to correct a misnomer in pleadings is procedural and governed by federal, not state, law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilson v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.
See also Hess v. Eddy, 689 F.2d 977, 980 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S.Ct. 3085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1982) (holding that the district court “erred in applying Alabama’s ‘no relation-back’ rule in the face of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure [17(a) ] that expressly authorizes and adopts the ‘relation-back’ doctrine” in context of administration of estate and suit filed in federal court prior to administratrix receiving official representative status).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Fortunato Ex Rel. Fortunato v. Handler
See also Hess v. Eddy, 689 F.2d 977, 980 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S.Ct. 3085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (district court “erred in applying Alabama’s ‘no relation back’ rule in the face of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure [17(a) ] that expressly authorizes and adopts the ‘relation back’ doctrine” in context of administration of estate and suit filed in federal court prior to administratrix receiving official representative status); Brohan v. Volkswagen Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin
See generally Burnett v. Grattan, 468 U.S. 42, 49-50 , 104 S.Ct. 2924, 2929-30 , 82 L.Ed.2d 36 (1984); see, e.g., Hess v. Eddy, 689 F.2d 977 (11th Cir.1982) (two years for wrongful death), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S.Ct. 3085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1983); Nathan Rodgers Construction & Realty Corp. v. City of Saraland, 670 F.2d 16 (5th Cir. Unit B.1982) (one year for denial of sewer permit); see also Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 763 F.2d at 1253 n. 1 (collecting cases in Alabama).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin
See generally Burnett v. Grattan, 468 U.S. 42, 49-50 , 104 S.Ct. 2924, 2929-30 , 82 L.Ed.2d 36 (1984); see, e.g., Hess v. Eddy, 689 F.2d 977 (11th Cir.1982) (two years for wrongful death), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1118 , 103 S.Ct. 3085 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1347 (1983); Nathan Rodgers Construction & Realty Corp. v. City of Saraland, 670 F.2d 16 (5th Cir. Unit B.1982) (one year for denial of sewer permit); see also Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 763 F.2d at 1253 n. 1 (collecting cases in Alabama).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McKay
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-1377.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 13, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1) · C.D. California (1)
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.