green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 43 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Korean Air Lines Disaster of Sept. 1, 1983
it would be absurd that a party who has chosen not to argue a point on a first appeal should stand better as regards the law of the case than one who had argued and lost.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Branch v. Ogilvy & Mather, Inc.
he law of the case will be disregarded only when the court has 'a clear conviction of error' with respect to a point of law on which its previous decision was predicated
discussed
Cited "see"
Martinez Jr v. Commissioner of Social Security
See Carrillo v. Heckler, 599 F. Supp. 1164 (S.D.N.Y. 1984) (citing Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100 , 108 (2d Cir.1981) (applying the law of the case doctrine to a Social Security appeal), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 (1982)); Calderon v. Astrue, 683 F. Supp. 2d 273, 276 (E.D.N.Y. 2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Prasoprat v. Benov
(2×)
See Zuniga v. United Can Co., 812 F.2d 443, 450 (9th Cir.1987) (“District courts are ... bound by the law of their own circuit, and ‘are not to resolve splits between circuits no matter how egregiously in error they may feel their own circuit to be.’ ”) (quoting Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc., 663 F.2d 930, 933 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Olmsted v. Pruco Life Ins. Co. of New Jersey
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100 , 105 (2d Cir.1981) (finding insufficient grounds for departing from the law of the case which assumed a private right exists), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982); Moses v. Burgin, 445 F.2d 369, 373 (1st Cir. 1971) (§ 36) (noting that the defendants did not contest the issue); Brown v. Bullock, 294 F.2d 415, 421 (2d Cir.1961) (§§ 37, 15(a), 15(b)) (assuming, without being presented with the issue, that a cause of action exists); Merine v. Prudential-Bache Utility Fund, Inc., 859 F.Supp. 715, 718 (S.D.N.Y.1994) (§ 20(a)) (s…
discussed
Cited "see"
Aerogroup International, Inc. v. Marlboro Footworks, Ltd.
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 105-07 (2d Cir.1981) (Friendly, J.) (discussing the distinction between dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and dismissal for failure to state a claim), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982). 2 .Aerogroup asserts claims against Bata for false designation or origin, false description, false representation and infringement of trade dress under 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (a), trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (1), patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271 , and dilution under 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (c) — all federal …
discussed
Cited "see"
Blatt v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 109-10 (2d Cir.1981) (distinguishing between implied causes of action under the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisors Act based upon their respective jurisdictional grants), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosero
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 105-07 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 (1982); footnote 1, supra. Our decision in United States v. Wright-Barker, 784 F.2d 161, 170 (3rd Cir. 1986), does not compel a contrary result because the question at issue was not addressed by the court in that case.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1994
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 105-07 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982); footnote 1, supra. Our decision in United States v. Wright-Barker, 784 F.2d 161, 170 (3rd Cir.1986), does not compel a contrary result because the question at issue was not addressed by the court in that case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Purgess v. Sharrock
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 105-07 (2d Cir. 1981) (Friendly, J.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982) (test for whether claim can survive motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) is more rigorous than that for whether it is substantial enough to confer federal jurisdiction).
discussed
Cited "see"
Purgess v. Sharrock
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 105-07 (2d Cir.1981) (Friendly, J.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982) (test for whether claim can survive motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) is more rigorous than that for whether it is substantial enough to confer federal jurisdiction). 26 When the district court determined, at the end of the defendants' case, to dismiss plaintiff's last federal claim, there were no compelling reasons at that point to prevent a final determination of the state claims by the jury.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Great American Industries
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 108-09 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982). 25 We continue to believe that a minority shareholder, who has lost his right to a state appraisal because of a materially deceptive proxy, may make "a sufficient showing of causal relationship between the violation and the injury for which he seeks redress." Mills, 396 U.S. at 385 , 90 S.Ct. at 622 .
cited
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Great American Industries, Inc.
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 108-09 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 108-09 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bowen v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama
See Parker v. Anderson, 667 F.2d 1204, 1214 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. *897 828, 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982); Report of the Third Circuit Task Force, Court Awarded Attorney Fees, 108 F.R.D. 237 , 255 (1985). i. Reasonable Hours Plaintiffs’ attorney Beck has requested compensation for 951.6 hours, and has submitted itemized documentation of the time he has devoted to this case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hasbrouck v. Texaco
(2×)
See Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp., 328 U.S. 275, 283-84 , 66 S.Ct. 1105, 1110 , 90 L.Ed. 1230 (1946). 49 AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED. 1 Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc., 663 F.2d 930 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982) 2 The lodestar is the amount derived from the reasonable hours expended multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate.
discussed
Cited "see"
Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.
(2×)
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F. 2d 100, 109 (CA2 1981) (“The law of the case will be disregarded only when the court has ‘a clear conviction of error’ ”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 828 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. Bowen
(2×)
See Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc., 663 F.2d 930, 933 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Gilmore v. Shearson/American Express Inc.
Accord Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 109 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Bancroft Convertible Fund, Inc. v. Zico Investment Holdings Inc.
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 105-12 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Bancroft Convertible Fund, Inc. v. Zico Investment Holdings Inc.
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 105-12 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ibarra v. Texas Employment Commission
(2×)
See Parker v. Anderson, 667 F.2d 1204, 1208 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982); see also Newman v. Graddick, 740 F.2d 1513 (11th Cir.1984) (upholding the approval of consent decree in prison litigation over the objection of the state attorney general who had no interest prejudicially affected by the decree).
discussed
Cited "see"
Krome v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
There has been a “long standing practice in the courts of inferring private remedies under the ICA.” Note, Implied Private Rights of Action Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 40 Wash. & Lee L.Rev. 1069, 1085-86 (1983) [hereinafter cited as Implied Rights of Action ]; accord Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 110 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982); Korpela & Reiser, Shareholders’ Suits Against Investment Companies, 30 A.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bush
(2×)
See State v. Stewart, 278 S.C. 296 , 295 SE.2d 627 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 64 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca7 1985
(2×)
Underlying these standards is the general policy favoring voluntary settlements of class action disputes, Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. v. Village of Arlington Heights, 616 F.2d at 1013 ; accord Bennett v. Behring Corp., 737 F.2d 982, 986 (11th Cir.1984); Adams Extract Co. v. Pleasure Hours, Inc. (In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation), 643 F.2d 195, 207 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 998 , 102 S.Ct. 2283 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1294 (1982), a policy even more forcefully applicable in Title VII cases because of Congress' express preference for settlement in such cases, Freedman…
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc.
(2×)
Underlying these standards is the general policy favoring voluntary settlements of class ac tion disputes, Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. v. Village of Arlington Heights, 616 F.2d at 1013 ; accord Bennett v. Behring Corp., 737 F.2d 982, 986 (11th Cir.1984); Adams Extract Co. v. Pleasure Hours, Inc. (In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation), 643 F.2d 195, 207 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 998 , 102 S.Ct. 2283 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1294 (1982), a policy even more forcefully applicable in Title VII cases because of Congress’ express preference for settlement in such cases, Freed…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Henriquez
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 105-07 (2d Cir. 1981) (Friendly, J.) (elaborating upon judicial confusion between “jurisdiction” and whether the complaint states a cause of action), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 5.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Henriquez
See Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 105-07 (2d Cir.1981) (Friendly, J.) (elaborating upon judicial confusion between "jurisdiction" and whether the complaint states a cause of action), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Walsh v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
See Parker v. Anderson, 667 F.2d 1204, 1210-11 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982); Kincade v. General Tire & Rubber Co., 635 F.2d 501, 508 (5th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Walsh v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
See Parker v. Anderson, 667 F.2d 1204, 1210-11 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982); Kincade v. General Tire & Rubber Co., 635 F.2d 501, 508 (5th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Temengil v. Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands
See Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc., 663 F.2d 930, 933 (9th Cir. 1981), cert.denied U.S. _, S.Ct. _, 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jiggetts v. Dowling
Plaintiffs’ brief states that “[t]he only issue presented for review by this court is whether state law permits the state defendant to set shelter allowances so low as to force families into homelessness,” and later, under the head ing “Question Presented for Review” provides: “Do the Social Services Law and the State Constitution permit the State Department of Social Services to set maximum rent allowances paid to recipients of Aid to Families with Dependent Children at levels so low that families are forced into homelessness?” Accordingly, since plaintiffs did not pursue their …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Fleet/Norstar Securities Litigation
(2×)
Id.; see also Parker v. Anderson, 667 F.2d 1204, 1209 (5th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982). (a) The Class Action Claims In Count I and Count II the class plaintiffs made claims under § 10(b) of the Exchange Act 2 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. 3 Common law claims for negligent mis *106 representation were also asserted in Count III.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Lesslie
(2×)
People v. Oates, 698 P.2d 811 (Colo.1985); cf. O’Connor v. Ortega, 480 U.S. 709 , 107 S.Ct. 1492 , 94 L.Ed.2d 714 (1987) (reasonable expectation must be addressed on a case-by-case basis weighing the general practical societal expectations of privacy in the workplace against the practical realities of the particular workplace); compare People v. Hillman, 834 P.2d 1271 (Colo.1992) (no invasion of privacy in observation of that which is plainly visible to the public) and United States v. Rose, 669 F.2d 23 (1st Cir.1982), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982) (no reas…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Degulis v. LXR Biotechnology, Inc.
Furthermore, the law of the case doctrine, although not binding on the court, see id., “counsels against reopening issues previously decided” absent those same “compelling circumstances.” Siderpali, S.P.A v. Judal Indus., Inc., 833 F.Supp. 1023, 1027 (S.D.N.Y.1993); see also Branch v. Ogilvy & Mather, Inc., 765 F.Supp. 819, 823 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (“The law of the case will be disregarded only when the court has ‘a clear conviction of error’ with respect to a point of law on which its previous decision was predicated.”) (quoting Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 109 (2d Cir.1981), c…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gass
(2×)
See also, U.S. v. Rose, 669 F.2d 23, 26-27 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yavapai-Apache Tribe v. Mejia
(2×)
See also Estate of Johnson, 125 Cal.App.3d 1044, 1048 , 178 Cal.Rptr. 823, 826 (Cal.Ct.App.1981), cert. denied by Cory v. Campbell, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982) (recognizing that assimilation policy existed in United States in the 1900s).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.
(2×)
See also Parker v. Anderson, 667 F.2d 1204, 1210-11 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982) (consent decree in class action upheld despite objections of a named party and class representative).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Banco De Ponce v. Hinsdale Supermarket Corp.
See, e.g., Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 105-07 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Holst v. Bowen
(2×)
See, e.g., Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc., 663 F.2d 930, 933 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 63 , 74 L.Ed.2d 65 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul S. Mullin & Associates, Inc. v. Bassett
See, e.g., Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 109-112 (2d Cir.1981) (discussing whether private right of action under ICA existed in light of Supreme Court decision in TAMA), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982); Note, Implied Private Rights of Action Under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 40 Wash. & Lee L.Rev. 1069 (1983) (reviewing recent Supreme Court decisions and concluding that courts should continue to imply private remedy under ICA).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Perez-Perez v. Hanberry
Bertrand v. Sava, 684 F.2d 204 (2d Cir.1982); see also Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 105-07 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982) (discussing the tendency to confuse jurisdictional and pleading requirements). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Howard v. Collins, and United States of America, Intervenor v. William Foreman, Vincent Pilleters and Terry Warden
See, e.g., Fogel v. Chestnutt, 668 F.2d 100, 116-17 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 828 , 103 S.Ct. 65 , 74 L.Ed.2d 66 (1982); Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Int’l Union v. NLRB, 547 F.2d 575 , 580 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 966 , 97 S.Ct. 2923 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1062 (1977).
Hill
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-2131.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1) · S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.