green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Watson v. Moeller Rubber Products, Inc.
See generally Air Express International Corp. v. NLRB, 659 F.2d 610, 614 (5th Cir.1981), modified on other grounds, 670 F.2d 512 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 835 , 103 S.Ct. 78 , 74 L.Ed.2d 75 (1982); NLRB v. Fabsteel, 587 F.2d 689, 692 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 943 , 99 S.Ct. 2887 , 61 L.Ed.2d 313 (1979); NLRB v. Foodway of El Paso, 496 F.2d 117, 120 (5th Cir.1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Arkansas Lighthouse for the Blind v. National Labor Relations Board
See Cincinnati Ass’n for the Blind v. NLRB, 672 F.2d 567, 571-72 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 835 , 103 S.Ct. 78 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 75 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Glenston P. Laws
See United States v. Woolery, 670 F.2d 513, 515-516 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 835 , 103 S.Ct. 78 , 74 L.Ed.2d 75 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stanley Weisz, United States of America v. Eugene Robert Ciuzio
See United States v. Alexandro, 675 F.2d 34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 78 , 74 L.Ed.2d 75 (1982). 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Kelly
See United States v. Alexandria, 675 F.2d 34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 78 , 74 L.Ed.2d 75 (1982). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Lighthouse for the Blind of Houston
Accord, Cincinnati Association for the Blind v. NLRB, 672 F.2d 567, 572 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 78 , 74 L.Ed.2d 75 (1982); Physicians National House Staff Association v. Fanning, 642 F.2d 492 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 917 , 101 S.Ct. 1360 , 67 L.Ed.2d 342 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Menashe
United States v. Romano, 706 F.2d 370, 372 (2d Cir.1983); see also, Hampton v. United States, 425 U.S. 484 , 495-96 n. 7, 96 S.Ct. 1646 , 1653 n. 7, 48 L.Ed.2d 113 (1976) (Powell, J., concurring) (“Police overinvolvement in crime would have to reach a demonstrable level of out-rageousness before it could bar conviction.”) “Under these standards, to be sure, the instances in which the Government violates the constitutional guarantees ‘will be exceedingly rare.’ ” United States v. Evans, 667 F.Supp. 974, 988 (S.D.N.Y.1987), aff'd 844 F.2d 36 (1988), quoting United States v. Alexandro…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph R. Silvestri
To the extent that Silvestri predicates his due process claim on the general conduct of the Abscam investigation, we reject the contention for reasons set forth in United States v. Myers, supra, 692 F.2d at 836-47 , and United States v. Williams, 705 F.2d 603, 619-622 (2d Cir.1983); see also United States v. Alexandro, 675 F.2d 34, 39-42 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 78 , 74 L.Ed.2d 75 (1982). 3 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Speckter
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-2288.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.