green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee
(2×)
United States v. Clark, 928 F.2d 733, 738 (6th Cir.) (quoting United States v. Grossman, 843 F.2d 78, 85 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1040 , 109 S.Ct. 864 , 102 L.Ed.2d 988 (1989)), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 885 , 112 S.Ct. 240 , 116 L.Ed.2d 195 (1991); see United States v. McMahon, 715 F.2d 498, 501 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1065 , 104 S.Ct. 1413 , 79 L.Ed.2d 739 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zhang Jian Zhong
See United States v. McMahon, 715 F.2d 498, 501-02 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1001 , 104 S.Ct. 507 , 78 L.Ed.2d 697 (1983), and cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1065 , 104 S.Ct. 1413 , 79 L.Ed.2d 739 . 14 The practices of a $4 billion industry 15 should have myriad sources of proof, and industry insiders such as the Sunlight defendants should have ample access to these sources.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Globe Indemnity Co. v. Wrenn Insurance Agency
See, e.g., Kruse v. Snowshoe Co., 715 F.2d 120, 124 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1065 , 104 S.Ct. 1413 , 79 L.Ed.2d 739 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Driver
See United States v. Sweeney, 688 F.2d 1131, 1141-42 (7th Cir.1982) (nondisclosure of medical reports concerning witness’s drug addiction was not prejudicial because contents of reports were elicited on cross-examination); see also United States v. McMahon, 715 F.2d 498, 501 (11th Cir.) (psychological report was not material because underlying facts were elicited on cross-examination), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1001 , 104 S.Ct. 507 , 78 L.Ed.2d 697 (1983) & 465 U.S. 1065 , 104 S.Ct. 1413 , 79 L.Ed.2d 739 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Canaday v. Koch
See, e.g., Kruse v. Snowshoe Co., 715 F.2d 120 (4th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1413 , 79 L.Ed.2d 739 (1984); Silberkleit v. Kantrowitz, 713 F.2d 433 (9th Cir.1983); Alkoff v. Gold, 611 F.Supp. 63 (S.D.N.Y.1985). 24 In an appropriate case, even the presence of a federal constitutional issue does not prevent Colorado River abstention.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul F. Fox v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
Neither case deals with a release or settlement arrived at under a state court FELA proceeding followed by a subsequent suit filed in federal court 1 The Court summarized the three traditional categories of abstention as (a) " 'cases presenting a federal constitutional issue which might be mooted ... by a state court determination of pertinent state law;' " (b) cases presenting "difficult questions of state law" that bear on "state efforts to establish a coherent policy with respect to a matter of substantial public concern;" and (c) cases where "federal jurisdiction has been invoked for the p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fox v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
The Court summarized the three traditional categories of abstention as (a) “'cases presenting a federal constitutional issue which might be mooted ... by a state court determination of pertinent state law;'" (b) cases presenting "difficult questions of state law" that bear on "state efforts to establish a coherent policy with respect to a matter of substantial public concern;” and (c) cases where "federal jurisdiction has been invoked for the purpose of restraining state criminal” and other types of state proceedings. 424 U.S. at 814-16 , 96 S.Ct. at 1244-45 (citations omitted); see also…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Snowshoe Co.
v.
Kruse
v.
Kruse
No. 83-772.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1984.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.