green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.3 score
“imply showing that the information would harm company's reputation is not sufficient to overcome the strong common law presumption in favor of public access to court proceedings and records.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Approximately up to $15,253,826 in Funds Contained in Thirteen Bank Accounts
imply showing that the information would harm company's reputation is not sufficient to overcome the strong common law presumption in favor of public access to court proceedings and records.
cited
Cited "see"
Walker Systems, Inc. v. Hubbell Inc.
See Brown & Williamson Tobacco v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984); In re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Prods.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Perrigo Company
(2×)
See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Flue-Cured Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Federal Trade Comm’n, 710 F.2d 1165, 1170 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984); Independent Broker-Dealers’ Trade Ass’n v. Securities & Exch.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jochims v. Isuzu Motors, Ltd.
See Brown v. Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir.1983) (the protection of trade secrets is "a recognized exception to the right of public access to judicial records”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Analytis
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Gjieli, 717 F.2d 968 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1101 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas v. News World Communications
See Mollnow v. Carlton, 716 F.2d 627, 632 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 126 , reh’g denied, 466 U.S. 954 , 104 S.Ct. 2162 , 80 L.Ed.2d 547 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jorden v. National Guard Bureau
See Mollnow v. Carlton, 716 F.2d 627, 629-30 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 126 (1984) (extending Chappell to bar claim under Sec. 1985); Elliot v. Perez, 751 F.2d 1472 (5th Cir.1985) (treating Sec. 1983 and Sec. 1985 together for immunity purposes) In addition, we must dismiss Jorden's common law cause of action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jorden v. National Guard Bureau
See Mollnow v. Carlton, 716 F.2d 627, 629-30 (9th Cir.1983), cert, denied 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 126 (1984) (extending Chappell to bar claim under § 1985); Elliot v. Perez, 751 F.2d 1472 (5th Cir.1985) (treating § 1983 and § 1985 together for immunity purposes).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Trade Commission v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation
See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
L.R. Bretz v. Zollie Kelman, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. Welborn
See Mollnow v. Carlton, 716 F.2d 627, 630 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 126 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
William Trerice v. Dan A. Pedersen, Captain, U.S. Navy, Commanding Officer, Uss Ranger
See Mollnow v. Carlton, 716 F.2d 627, 628 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 126 (1984); Mattos v. United States, 412 F.2d 793, 794 (9th Cir.1969); Bailey v. Van Buskirk, 345 F.2d 298, 298 (9th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 948 , 86 S.Ct. 1205 , 16 L.Ed.2d 210 (1966); see also Tirrill v. McNamara, 451 F.2d 579, 579 (9th Cir.1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hsieh Hui Mei Chen and Tsang-Chi Chen
(2×)
See United States v. Gjieli, 717 F.2d 968, 972 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984). b.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ray E. Loehr v. Ventura County Community College District
See Mollnow v. Carlton, 716 F.2d 627, 632 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 126 (1984). 49 Finally, although we cannot say a grant of Loehr's motion under rule 15 would have caused great prejudice, under these circumstances we believe the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion.
cited
Cited "see"
Loehr v. Ventura County Community College District
See Mollnow v. Carlton, 716 F.2d 627, 632 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 126 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Nos. 83-6228, 83-7678
See Mollnow v. Carlton, 716 F.2d 627 , 628 n. 1 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 126 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Pelleport Investors, Inc. v. Budco Quality Theatres, Inc.
See Mollnow v. Carlton, 716 F.2d 627 , 628 n. 1 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 126 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gary Van Waeyenberghe and Carl Leibowitz, and Howard K. Schwartz
“Public access [to judicial records] serves to promote trustworthiness of the judicial process, to curb judicial abuses, and to provide the public with a more complete understanding of the judicial system, including a better perception of its fairness.” Littlejohn, 851 F.2d at 682 ; see also Wil *850 son v. American Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568, 1571 (11th Cir.1985) (“The real focus of our inquiry is on the rights of the public in maintaining open records and the ‘check[ ] on the integrity of the system.’ ” (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1178-79 (6t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
S.E.C. v. Van Waeyenberghe
"Public access [to judicial records] serves to promote trustworthiness of the judicial process, to curb judicial abuses, and to provide the public with a more complete understanding of the judicial system, including a better perception of its fairness." Littlejohn, 851 F.2d at 682 ; see also Wilson v. American Motors Corp., 759 F.2d 1568, 1571 (11th Cir.1985) ("The real focus of our inquiry is on the rights of the public in maintaining open records and the "check[ ] on the integrity of the system.' " (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1178-79 (6th Cir.), cert. den…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic of the Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
We have recognized that “[t]he common law right of access is not limited to evidence, but rather encompasses all ‘judicial records and documents.’ ” United States v. Martin, 746 F.2d 964, 968 (3d Cir.1984) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Communications, 435 U.S. 589, 597 , 98 S.Ct. 1306, 1312 , 55 L.Ed.2d 570 (1978)); see also Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1179 (6th Cir.1983) (recognizing “strong common law presumption in favor of public access to court proceedings and records”), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic of Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation
We have recognized that "[t]he common law right of access is not limited to evidence, but rather encompasses all 'judicial records and documents.' " United States v. Martin, 746 F.2d 964, 968 (3d Cir.1984) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Communications, 435 U.S. 589, 597 , 98 S.Ct. 1306, 1312 , 55 L.Ed.2d 570 (1978)); see also Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1179 (6th Cir.1983) (recognizing "strong common law presumption in favor of public access to court proceedings and records"), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republic of the Philippines & National Power Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See also Brown & Wil liamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1178-79 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984) (summarizing interests served by open proceedings).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stam v. Derwinski
Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597-99 , 98 S.Ct. 1306, 1311-13 , 55 L.Ed.2d 570 (1978); see also Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1178 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984); Publicker Indus., Inc. v. Cohen, 733 F.2d 1059, 1066-71 (3d Cir.1984); In re Continental Illinois Sec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Consumers Power Co. Derivative Litigation
See also Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Federal Trade Comm'n., 710 F.2d 1165, 1179-80 (6th Cir.1983), cert denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984); Joy v. North, 692 F.2d 880, 894 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1498 , 75 L.Ed.2d 930 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bay State Ambulance & Hospital Rental Service, Inc.
See e.g., United States v. Brewster, 408 U.S. 501, 526 , 92 S.Ct. 2531, 2544 , 33 L.Ed.2d 507 (1972) (under 18 U.S.C. § 201 , “acceptance of the bribe is the violation of the statute, not performance of the illegal promise”); see also United States v. Gjieli, 717 F.2d 968, 973 (6th Cir.1983) (under 18 U.S.C. § 201 , there is no need to show that the person accepting the bribe could actually effect the object of the bribe), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1101 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984); United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 601 (3d Cir.) (under Hobbs Act, a bribe is still illegal…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Littlejohn v. Bic Corporation
See, e.g., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir.1983) (harm to reputation not sufficient to overcome common law presumption of access), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984). 52 BIC argues that it has shown how disclosure "would work a clearly defined and serious injury to its interests." The injury that BIC describes is an adverse effect on its disposable lighter sales by competitive use of the information and a potential loss in its capital stock value.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Littlejohn v. BIC Corp.
See, e.g., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir.1983) (harm to reputation not sufficient to overcome common law presumption of access), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1100 , 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cipollone v. Liggett Group Inc.
See also Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 127 (1984) (documents unsealed in part because “[t]he public has a strong interest in obtaining the information contained in the court record.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
v.
Federal Trade Commission
v.
Federal Trade Commission
No. 83-1010.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 1984.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Utah (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.