green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sheet Metal Division of Capitol District Sheet Metal, Roofing & Air Conditioning Contractors Ass'n v. Local Union 38 of the Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n
See Jones v. Amalgamated Warbasse Houses, Inc., 721 F.2d 881, 884 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1929 , 80 L.Ed.2d 474 (1984); McCann v. Coughlin, 698 F.2d 112, 131 (2d Cir.1983) (“[Wjhen a party seeks an award of attorney fees ... he must provide the court with contemporaneous time sheets or other documentation which will enable it to make an independent evaluation of the fee request.”) (emphasis added).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. City of Hialeah
See Romasanta v. United Air Lines, Inc., 717 F.2d 1140 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied sub nom, McDonald v. United Air Lines, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1928 , 80 L.Ed.2d 474 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gelt v. Janowitz (In Re Chisholm Co.)
See State Dept. of Natural Resources v. Southwestern Colo. Water Conservation Dist., 671 P.2d 1294, 1316-18 (Colo.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1929 , 80 L.Ed.2d 474 (1984) (landowners do not have interest in nontributary ground water coextensive with other interests in real property).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Lee Way Holding Co.
See Jones v. Amalgamated Warbasse Houses, Inc., 97 F.R.D. 355, 359 (E.D.N.Y.1982), affirmed, 721 F.2d 881 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1929 , 80 L.Ed.2d 474 (1984); McKerssie v. IU International Corporation, No. 86-C-1683 (N.D.Ill.1987) (1987 W.L. 14009).
discussed
Cited "see"
Uniroyal, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
See United States v. El Paso Co., 682 F.2d 530 (5th Cir.1982) cert denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1927 , 80 L.Ed.2d 473 ; “Developments in the Law — Privileged Communications,” 98 Harv.L.Rev. 1450 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Great Am. Surplus Lines Ins. Co.
See United States v. El Paso Co., 682 F.2d 530 (5th Cir.1982) cert denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1927 , 80 L.Ed.2d 473 ; "Developments in the LawPrivileged Communications," 98 Harv.L.Rev. 1450 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Foe v. Cuomo
See Jones v. Amalgamated Warbasse Houses, Inc., 97 F.R.D. 355, 359-60 (E.D.N.Y.1982), aff'd, 721 F.2d 881 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1929 , 80 L.Ed.2d 474 (1984) (value of having benefits accrue from complex litigation now rather than receiving same or lesser benefits at later date must be considered favorably in assessing adequacy of the settlement).
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Rath Packing Company
See Romasanta v. United Air Lines, Inc., 717 F.2d 1140, 1147-56 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1928 , 80 L.Ed.2d 474 (1984) (declining to award full, retroactive competitive seniority in light of the adverse impact on a substantial number of incumbent employees and certain economic conditions adversely affecting the defendant company's potential for growth).
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Rath Packing Co.
See Romasanta v. United Air Lines, Inc., 717 F.2d 1140, 1147-56 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1928 , 80 L.Ed.2d 474 (1984) (declining to award full, retroactive competitive seniority in light of the adverse impact on a substantial number of incumbent employees and certain economic conditions adversely affecting the defendant company’s potential for growth).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ford v. Jurgens
See, e.g., United States v. El Paso Co., 682 F.2d 530 , 542–43 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 944 (1984) (papers relating to the preparation of tax returns do not gain work product immunity solely because the IRS may conduct an audit); Status Time Corp., v. Sharp Elecs., Corp., 95 F.R.D. 27, 29 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) (documents relating to filing for or maintaining a patent are not protected solely because litigation of the patent right is a possibility); In re Penn Cent.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Trief v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.
See Piambino v. Bailey, 610 F.2d 1306, 1328 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1011 , 101 S.Ct. 568 , 66 L.Ed.2d 469 (1980); see also Jones v. Amalgamated Warbasse Houses, Inc., 721 F.2d 881, 884 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1929 , 80 L.Ed.2d 474 (1984); In re McDonnell Douglas Equip.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert L. Clarke, Comptroller of the Currency v. American Commerce National Bank, Anaheim, California
See also United States v. El Paso Co., 682 F.2d 530, 541-42 (5th Cir.1982) (attempt to invoke privilege rejected, due in part to the failure to “particularize its assertion of the privilege” with respect to each specific document), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1927 , 80 L.Ed.2d 473 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shearn MOODY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
See, e.g., United States v. El Paso Co., 682 F.2d 530, 539 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1927 , 80 L.Ed.2d 473 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lopez
See, e.g., United States v. Black, 675 F.2d 129 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1068 , 103 S.Ct. 1520 , 75 L.Ed.2d 945 (1983); United States v. Berry, 670 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.1982); see also Wilson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 34 Cal.3d 777 , 195 Cal.Rptr. 671 , 670 P.2d 325 (1983) (In Bank), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1929 , 80 L.Ed.2d 474 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Santiago v. Miles
See also, United States v. El Paso Company, 682 F.2d 530, 542-43 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1927 , 80 L.Ed.2d 473 (1984); Colton v. United States, 306 F.2d 633, 639-40 (2d Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 951 , 83 S.Ct. 505 , 9 L.Ed.2d 499 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
See also United States v. El Paso Co., 682 F.2d 530, 540 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1927 , 80 L.Ed.2d 473 (1984) (finding waiver of privilege when documents disclosed to independent auditors).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Albert Samuel Fortna, Jr., James Lyne Harnage, George M. Sharer, and Christopher James Reo
The district court relied upon the comprehensive definition of the attorney-client privilege set out in In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 517 F.2d 666 (5th Cir.1975): "(1) the asserted holder of the privilege is or sought to become a client; (2) the person to *730 whom the communication was made (a) is [the] member of a bar or a court, or his subordinate and (b) in connection with this communication is acting as a lawyer; (3) the communication relates to a fact of which the attorney was informed (a) by his client (b) without the presence of strangers (c) for the purpose of securing primarily eithe…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Witness Before the Grand Jury
See also United States v. El Paso Company, 682 F.2d 530 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 944 , 104 S.Ct. 1927 , 80 L.Ed.2d 473 (1984); United States v. Willis, 565 F.Supp. 1186 (S.D.Ia.1983).
Young
v.
Mrock
v.
Mrock
No. 83-6426.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 16, 1984.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.