Field Commc'ns Corp. v. Braig, 466 U.S. 970 (1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Field Commc'ns Corp. v. Braig, 466 U.S. 970 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ruefenacht v. O'halloran (ca3, 1984-06-11) · Strongest negative: DiSalle v. P.G. Publishing Co. (pasuperct, 1988-06-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" DiSalle v. P.G. Publishing Co. (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1988 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Braig v. Field Communications, 310 Pa.Super. 569, 587 , 456 A.2d 1366, 1376 (1983), allocatur denied, *532 cert. denied, 466 U.S. 970 , 104 S.Ct. 2341 , 80 L.Ed.2d 816 (1984) (court implicitly rejected the neutral reportage doctrine by reversing summary judgment in favor of defendant television station on grounds that jury could find actual malice in rebroadcasting accusations of another where there was evidence that station general manager may have had "serious doubts" about truth of the underlying statements).
cited Cited "see" Ruefenacht v. O'halloran
3rd Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Seagrave Corp. v. Vista Resources, Inc., 710 F.2d 95 (2d Cir.1983) (per curiam) (following Golden v. Garafalo, supra), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 2341 , 80 L.Ed.2d 815 (1984). .
discussed Cited "see" Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,514 Max A. Ruefenacht v. Christopher J. O'halloran, Joachim K. Birkle and Continental Import & Export, Inc., and W. George Gould. Christopher J. O'halloran, Third-Party v. W. George Gould, Esq., Third-Party W. George Gould, Third-Party v. David Bernstein, Autobern Trading Co., Inc., Ernest Stoecklin, Lenzenhof Gmbh, Third-Party Appeal of Max A. Ruefenacht
3rd Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Seagrave Corp. v. Vista Resources, Inc., 710 F.2d 95 (2d Cir.1983) (per curiam) (following Golden v. Garafalo, supra ), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 2341 , 80 L.Ed.2d ---- (1984). 4 Gould has impleaded Autobern Trading Corp., Ruefenacht's full-time employer, Bernstein and Stoecklin, associates of Birkle and Ruefenacht, and Lenzenhof GmbH, a German Corporation controlled by Birkle.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Field Communications Corp.
v.
Braig, Judge, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County
No. 83-502.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 14, 1984.
466 U.S. 970
Published

Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.