green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlantigas Corp. v. Nisource, Inc.
See Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 787 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984); Freiman v. Lazur, 925 F.Supp. 14, 24 (D.D.C.1996); Environmental Research Int’l., Inc. v. Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc., 355 A.2d at 813 .
cited
Cited "see"
Farah v. Stout
See Ebert v. Ritchey, 54 Md.App. 388, 398 , 458 A.2d 891 , cert. denied, 296 Md. 414 (1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 356 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Trust for Historic Preservation v. Blanck
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Curran, 456 U.S. at 378 , 102 S.Ct. at 1839 ; Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington, 442 U.S. 560, 575 , 99 S.Ct. 2479, 2488-89 , 61 L.Ed.2d 82 (1979); see Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 789-90 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Horowitz v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.
See Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 792, n. 20 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984); Krasnov v. Dinan, 465 F.2d 1298, 1300 (3d Cir.1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Alvin Gandal v. Telemundo Group, Inc., Advo System, Inc. Alvin Gandal v. Telemundo Group, Inc. Alvin Gandal v. Telemundo Group, Inc. Reliance Group Holdings, Inc.
See Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 782 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Gandal v. Telemundo Group, Inc.
See Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 782 (D.C.Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rita J. Minnette v. Time Warner
See Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 789 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984); 15 Charles A. Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 3827, at 261-62 (2d ed. 1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Denkmann Associates v. International Paper Co.
See Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Clark, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984); Doty v. St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Clements Distributing Co. of Virginia v. Celebrity Products, Inc.
D.C.Code § 13-423(b); see Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 542 F.Supp. 1196, 1199 (D.D.C.1982), aff’d, 722 F.2d 779 (D.C.Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
First Chicago International v. United Exchange Co., Ltd.
See Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 785 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984) (§ 13-423(a)(l) does not confer specific personal jurisdiction where the claims asserted are "unrelated to the acts forming the basis for personal jurisdiction").
cited
Cited "see"
Struth v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
See Antonelli v. F.B.I., 721 F.2d 615, 619 (7th Cir.1983), cert, denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kent B. Crane v. Archie Carr, III
See Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 786-87 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984); Investment Co. Inst. v. United States, 550 F.Supp. 1213, 1216 (D.D.C.1982) (relationships with federal *762 agencies did not enter into the personal jurisdiction calculus).
discussed
Cited "see"
Melvin D. Reuber v. United States of America
(2×)
See Naartex Consulting Corp., v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 788 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chase v. Pan-Pacific Broadcasting, Inc.
See Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 787 (D.C.Cir.1983) (certain “conclusory statements] [do] not constitute the prima facie showing necessary to carry the burden of establishing personal jurisdiction”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984); Holfield v. Power Chemical Co., Inc., 382 F.Supp. at 390 (“Mere averments of jurisdiction are not enough nor may conclusory unsupported statements contained in the accompanying affidavits be relied upon to demonstrate jurisdiction.”). b.
discussed
Cited "see"
Unification Church v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 794 (D.C.Cir.1983) (claim), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984); Sedgwick v. Superior Court for the District of Columbia, 584 F.2d 1044 , 1045 n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1978) (appeal), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1075 , 99 S.Ct. 849 , 59 L.Ed.2d 42 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Laborers' International Union of North America v. United States Department of Justice
See Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 788 (D.C.Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984); Doe v. District of Columbia, 697 F.2d 1115, 1119 (D.C.Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harold M. Johnson v. United States Department of Justice
See Antonelli v. FBI, 721 F.2d 615, 617 (7th Cir. 1983) , cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984); Vaughn, 484 F.2d at 823-28 . *1517 In this case, the FBI met its initial burden by Special Agent Berndt’s declaration and by the district court’s in camera inspection of the documents.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Northrop Grumman Computing Systems, Inc. v. United States
Co. v. England, 313 F.3d 1344, 1349 (Fed.Cir.2002) (discussing the interrelationship of these statutes). .See Sun Cal, Inc. v. United States, 21 Cl.Ct. 31, 37 (1990) (applying the holding in Beaconwear to a CDA claim); Rodgers Constr., Inc., 92-1 B.C.A. ¶ 24,503 (1991) (same); Fireman’s Fund/Underwater Constr., Inc., 87-3 B.C.A. ¶ 20,007 (1987) (same); see also Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 794 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984); Tuftco Corp. v. United States, 614 F.2d 740 , 744 n. 4 (Ct.Cl.1980); Kenrich Corp. v. Miller, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
S. Kadic, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of Her Infant Sons Benjamin and Ognjen, Internationalna Iniciativa Zena Bosne I Hercegovine \Biser
Karadzic analogizes his proposed rule to the "government contacts exception" to the District of Columbia's long-arm statute, which has been broadly characterized to mean that "mere entry [into the District of Columbia] by non-residents for the purpose of contacting federal government agencies cannot serve as a basis for in personam jurisdiction," Rose v. Silver, 394 A.2d 1368, 1370 (D.C.1978); see also Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 785-87 (D.C.Cir.1983) (construing government contacts exception to District of Columbia's long-arm statute), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.C…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kadic v. Karadžić
Karadzic analogizes his proposed rule to the “government contacts exception” to the District of Columbia’s long-arm statute, which has been broadly characterized to mean that “mere entry [into the District of Columbia] by non-residents for the purpose of contacting federal government agencies cannot serve as a basis for in personam jurisdiction,” Rose v. Silver, 394 A.2d 1368, 1370 (D.C.1978); see also Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 785-87 (D.C.Cir.1983) (construing government contacts exception to District of Columbia’s long-arm statute), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 12…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hansen v. Neumueller GmbH
See, e.g., Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 788 (D.C.Cir.1983) (“[A] district court has broad discretion in its resolution of discovery problems that arise in cases pending before it.”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alvie James Hale, Jr. v. United States Department of Justice, and Its Component, the Federal Bureau of Investigation
See Burge, 934 F.2d at 580 ; see also Antonelli v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 721 F.2d 615, 619 (7th Cir.1983) (“The contention that ‘the public shares [the requester’s] interest in ensuring that his convictions were not obtained as a result of a violation of the Constitution’ is [an] insufficient [public interest].”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1210 , 104 S.Ct. 2399 , 81 L.Ed.2d 355 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ebert et ux.
v.
Ritchey
v.
Ritchey
No. 83-1600.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 21, 1984.
Published
Ct. Sp. App. Md. Motion of respondent for damages denied. Certiorari denied.