green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.0 score
“congress intended conciliation efforts under sec. 626(d) to be a strict condition precedent to the initiation of any litigation in federal courts," and "an absolute period of abstention by the federal judiciary.”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Bart Forzese
But cf. United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1354 (D.C.Cir.1983) (al *223 though district court failed to provide rationale for amount of restitution ordered, record was sufficiently clear to demonstrate that order was properly within its discretion), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
June M. Betts v. Hamilton County Board Of Mental Retardation And Developmental Disabilities
congress intended conciliation efforts under sec. 626(d) to be a strict condition precedent to the initiation of any litigation in federal courts," and "an absolute period of abstention by the federal judiciary.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Betts v. Hamilton County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities
congress intended conciliation efforts under 626(d) to be a strict condition precedent to the initiation of any litigation in federal courts," and "an absolute period of abstention by the federal judiciary.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kayode, Olanike
See United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1348 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984). 10 . 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (a)(2) provides "Whoever ... knowingly and with intent to defraud traffics in or uses one or more unauthorized access devices during any one-year period, and by such conduct obtains anything of value aggregating $1,000 or more during that period ... shall, if the offense affects interstate or foreign commerce, be punished [as provided in another subsection of the statute]." The statute defines "access devices” to include credit cards.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wallace
See United States v. Robison, 904 F.2d 365, 368 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 946 , 111 S.Ct. 360 , 112 L.Ed.2d 323 (1990). 28 The Fifth Amendment mandates that "[n]o person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury...." A "substantial deviation of [jury] instructions from an indictment is impermissible because first it requires a defendant to answer a criminal charge that was not brought by a grand jury, ... and second it denies the defendant sufficient notice to prepare and present an adequate defense." Unit…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas McGowan
See United States v. Cody, 722 F.2d 1052, 1059 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Capital Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
See Lewis Service Center, Inc. v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 714 F.2d 842 (8th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984). 21 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Iniguez
(2×)
See United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327 (D.D.C.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984); United States v. Johnson, 700 F.2d 699 (11th Cir.1983); United States v. Brown, 699 F.2d 704 (5th Cir.1983); State v. Fader, 358 N.W.2d 42 (Minn.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fawaz Yunis, A/K/A Nazeeh
See United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1339 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carrye E. Maxwell
See United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327 , 1334-35 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984). 9 . 18 U.S.C. § 1343 provided in full at the time as follows: Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executin…
discussed
Cited "see"
Capital Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
Section one of the Sherman Act prohibits “every contract, combination ... or conspiracy, in restraint of trade.” 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1976); see Lewis Service Center, Inc. v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 714 F.2d 842, 845 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
McAllister Bros., Inc. v. United States
See Faust v. South Carolina State Highway Dep’t, 721 F.2d 934 , 939 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984); see also Wiggins, 799 F.2d at 965 (discussing the effect of the Faust case on the Fourth Circuit’s earlier decision).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oscar Porcelli
(2×)
See United States v. Cody, 722 F.2d 1052, 1060-61 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984); United States v. Ivic, 700 F.2d 51, 65 (2d Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gallo
See United States v. Cody, 722 F.2d 1052 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gallo
See United States v. Cody, 722 F.2d 1052 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984). 32 In 1980, appellant Miron, who was president of a number of building supply companies that hired Local 282 truck drivers, was called as a witness before the grand jury investigating Cody.
discussed
Cited "see"
William E. Wilson v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation
See Vance v. Whirlpool Corp., 716 F.2d 1010, 1013-14 (4th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1600 , 80 L.Ed.2d 130 and 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984) (Widener, J., dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see"
Evelyn McCONNELL and Floyd Ray Addy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
See Vance v. Whirlpool Corp., 707 F.2d 483, 489 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984); Wright v. State of Tennessee, 628 F.2d 949, 953 (6th Cir.1980) (en banc); Reich v. Dow Badische Co., 575 F.2d 363, 367-68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1006 , 99 S.Ct. 621 , 58 L.Ed.2d 683 (1978); Cannon v. University of Chicago, 559 F.2d 1063, 1076-77 (7th Cir.1976), rev’d in part and remanded on other grounds, 441 U.S. 677 , 99 S.Ct. 1946 , 60 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James R. Gallup, United States of America v. Darryl E. Duke
See, United States v. Gering, 716 F.2d 615, 625 (9th Cir.1983), and United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1353 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
John K. Lincoln v. Franklin Y.K. Sunn
See United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1344 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. North Dakota Hospital Ass'n
See 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1976). “[T]he Supreme Court has long recognized, however, [that] Congress could not have intended a literal interpretation of the word ‘every.’ ” Lewis Service Center, Inc. v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 714 F.2d 842, 845 (8th Cir. 1983) (citing Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society, 457 U.S. 332, 342 , 102 S.Ct. 2466, 2472 , 73 L.Ed.2d 48 (1982)), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sigalow
The defendant must show that he would be so prejudiced by trying both counts that “in effect [he] would be denied a constitutionally fair trial.” United States v. Wheaton, 463 F.Supp. 1073, 1077 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem., 614 F.2d 1293 (2d Cir.1979); accord United States v. Cody, 722 F.2d 1052, 1061 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984); United States v. Aloi, 449 F.Supp. 698, 739 (E.D.N.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul R. Bonansinga
See United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1335 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Solomon Weiss
(2×)
See generally United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327 (D.C.Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984); United States v. Beeler, supra; United States v. Silverman, 430 F.2d 106, 111 (2d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 953 , 91 S.Ct. 1619 , 29 L.Ed.2d 123 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Paul Bender, George and Diane Decarlo v. Southland Corporation
See Lewis Service Center, Inc. v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 714 F.2d 842, 846 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984); AAA Liquors, 705 F.2d at 1205 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ioannis Tzakis
See United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1353 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duke Ex Rel. Duke v. Department of Agriculture
See, e.g., Faust v. South Carolina State Highway Dep’t, 721 F.2d 934 , 940-41 (4th Cir.1983) (acknowledging overruling of Chesapeake Bay Bridge & Tunnel Dist. v. Lauritzen, 404 F.2d 1001 , 1003 (4th Cir.1968), relied on by plaintiffs), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984); see also Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 609 , -, 116 S.Ct. 1114, 1125 , 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996) (Congress had no power to unilaterally abrogate state’s Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity when the act in question was not “passed pursuant to a constitutional provision gra…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duke v. Department Of Agriculture
See, e.g., Faust v. South Carolina State Highway Dep't, 721 F.2d 934 , 940-41 (4th Cir.1983) (acknowledging overruling of Chesapeake Bay Bridge & Tunnel Dist. v. Lauritzen, 404 F.2d 1001 , 1003 (4th Cir.1968), relied on by plaintiffs), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984); see also Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. 609 , ----, 116 S.Ct. 1114, 1125 , 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996) (Congress had no power to unilaterally abrogate state's Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity when the act in question was not "passed pursuant to a constitutional provision granti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thermon Phillips, E.B. Rich, Usx Corporation A/K/A United States Steel Corporation
See, e.g., United States v. Cody, 722 F.2d 1052, 1059 (2d Cir.) (requiring proof only that defendant "received and knew that he was receiving a benefit of value”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1983); United States v. Pecora, 484 F.2d 1289, 1294 (3d Cir.1973) (requiring knowledge only "(1) that there were 'payments’; and (2) that the payments came from employers who employed workers represented by [defendant]”); United States v. Carter, 311 F.2d 934, 943 (6th Cir.) (quoting Hand, J., with approval: "the word 'willful,' even in criminal statutes, means no …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Glen D. Morgan, United States of America v. John R. Garner, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1339-40 (D.C.Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. United States
See also United States v. Lemire, 232 U.S.App.D.C. 100, 127 , 720 F.2d 1327, 1354 (1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hall American Center Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Dick
See, e.g., United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1335 (D.C.Cir.1983) (elements of mail and wire fraud statutes similar, thus cases construing the statutes helpful to interpretation of both statutes), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John R. Fritsch
See also United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327 , 1352 & n. 37 (D.C.Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984) (holding defendant’s statement that he was fully prepared to pay restitution was a waiver of *669 challenge to the court’s power to impose restitution).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tannehill v. United States
Bishop v. United States, 673 F.2d 1369, 1373 , 230 Ct.Cl. 215, 220-21 (1982) (citing Sanders v. United States, 594 F.2d 804, 811 , 219 Ct.Cl. 285, 298 (1979)); see also Selman v. United States, 723 F.2d 877, 880 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morda v. Klein
See, e.g., United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984); United States v. Von Barta, 635 F.2d 999, 1005-07 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 1703 , 68 L.Ed.2d 199 (1981); United States v. Bryza, 522 F.2d 414, 422-23 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 2237 , 48 L.Ed.2d 837 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morda v. Klein
See, e.g., United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984); United States v. Von Barta, 635 F.2d 999, 1005-07 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 998 , 101 S.Ct. 1703 , 68 L.Ed.2d 199 (1981); United States v. Bryza, 522 F.2d 414, 422-23 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 2237 , 48 L.Ed.2d 837 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
MHC, Inc. v. International Union, United Mine Workers
See e.g., United States v. Cody, 722 F.2d 1052, 1056 (2nd Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Persico
See also United States v. Cody, 722 F.2d 1052, 1056-57 (2d Cir.1983) (government must prove defendant committed at least one timely predicate act), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984); Castallano, 610 F.Supp. at 1383 ("Section 3282 does require that each defendant be named in at least one act of racketeering which is alleged to have occurred in the last five years."); United States v. Field, 432 F.Supp. 55, 59 (S.D.N.Y.1977) (statute runs from date of last act of racketeering), aff'd mem., 578 F.2d 1371 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 5…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Persico
See also United States v. Cody, 722 F.2d 1052, 1056-57 (2d Cir.1983) (government must prove defendant committed at least one timely predicate act), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984); Castallano, 610 F.Supp. at 1383 (“Section 3282 does require that each defendant be named in at least one act of racketeering which is alleged to have occurred in the last five years.”); United States v. Field, 432 F.Supp. 55, 59 (S.D.N.Y.1977) (statute runs from date of last act of racketeering), aff'd mem., 578 F.2d 1371 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sloan v. United States
(2×)
See also United States v. Lemire, 232 U.S.App.D.C. 100, 126 , 720 F.2d 1327, 1353 (1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1226 , 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984); State v. Lack, 98 N.M. 500, 506 , 650 P.2d 22, 28 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Morley v. Cohen
See, e.g., United States v. Cody, 722 F.2d 1052, 1056 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2678 , 81 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lewis Service Center, Inc.
v.
Mack Trucks, Inc.
v.
Mack Trucks, Inc.
No. 83-1273.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 4, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.