green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 6×
15.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Paul S. Doherty, Jr. v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund Of Philadelphia And Vicinity
(2×)
But see Republic Indus. v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 Pension Fund, 718 F.2d 628 , 644 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984) (allowing equitable tolling where an employer had brought a non-frivolous constitutional challenge to the MPPAA on an issue not previously decided) In Slotky, the Seventh Circuit denied equitable tolling of the arbitration deadline to an employer that had been sued for withdrawal liability.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Doherty v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund
(2×)
But see Republic Indus. v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 Pension Fund, 718 F.2d 628 , 644 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984) (allowing equitable tolling where an employer had brought a non-frivolous constitutional challenge to the MPPAA on an issue not previously decided).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
At & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
(2×)
congress may require arbitration so long as fair procedures are provided and ultimate judicial review is available
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bellaire Corp. v. Shalala
(2×)
the court's method of analysis in turner elkhorn mining represents a fundamental shift from that employed in alton railroad.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
LTV Steel Co. v. Shalala
(2×)
the court's method of analysis in turner elkhorn mining represents a fundamental shift from that employed in alton railroad.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Chateaugay Corporation
(2×)
the court's method of analysis in turner elkhorn mining represents a fundamental shift from that employed in alton railroad.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Penn Advertising of Baltimore, Inc. v. Mayor of Baltimore
(2×)
we hold that sufficient reason exists to believe that advertising and consumption are linked to justify the ban , whether or not 'concrete scientific evidence' exists to that effect.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
McDonald v. Centra
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
mppaa ... protects the interlocking interests of the pbgc, the premium payers, the withdrawing employers and the vested employees.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gelb v. Royal Globe Insurance
Ct. 145, 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1937). 6 Since Gelb did not receive effective appellate review of whether he caused the Franklin Place fire, collateral estoppel does not apply to bar relitigation of this issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas v. American Blastfax, Inc.
(2×)
See Dunagin v. City of Oxford, 718 F.2d 738, 752 (5th Cir.1983) (“In this case we have held the Mississippi law entirely legal under the First Amendment, and parties cannot insist on strict scrutiny merely by asserting a First Amendment right that the court ultimately finds not to be violated.”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Walter Garrett v. L. Clarke
See Miner v. Brackney, 719 F.2d 954, 956 (8th Cir. 1983) (per curiam), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adams Ford Belton, Inc. v. Missouri Motor Vehicle Commission
(2×)
See Dunagin v. City of Oxford, Miss., 718 F.2d 738, 752-53 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984); see also Williams v. Vermont, 472 U.S. 14, 22-23 , 105 S.Ct. 2465, 2471-72 , 86 L.Ed.2d 11 (1985); Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Schmoke
(2×)
See Dunagin v. City of Oxford, Miss., 718 F.2d 738 , 748-49 n. 8 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1995
(2×)
See Dunagin v. City of Oxford, Miss., 718 F.2d 738 , 748-49 n. 8 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doolin Security Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(2×)
See Republic Indus., Inc. v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 of Virginia Pension Fund, 718 F.2d 628, 640-11 (4th Cir. 1983) (reasoning that trustees were not biased in making determinations of withdrawal liability, in part, because their computation of liability was prescribed by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980, 29 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
examined
Cited "see"
Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of the Army of the United States
(4×)
See Marroquin-Manriquez v. I.N.S., 699 F.2d 129, 134 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
examined
Cited "see"
Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of Army of United States
(4×)
See Marroquin-Manriquez v. I.N.S., 699 F.2d 129, 134 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bd. of Educ. of Carlsbad v. Harrell
See Textile Workers Pension Fund v. Standard Dye & Finishing Co., 725 F.2d 843, 855 (2d Cir.) (where party in compulsory, binding arbitration “may come to the district court to enforce, vacate or modify an arbitrator’s award, [the party] is not denied meaningful access to the courts”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984); State Farm Mut.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Singleterry
See generally Dunagin v. City ___ _________ _______ ____ of Oxford, 718 F.2d 738 , 748 n.8 (5th Cir. 1983) (en banc) _________ (plurality), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 (1984); Menora v. _____ ______ ______ Illinois High Sch.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Singleterry
See generally Dunagin v. City of Oxford, 718 F.2d 738 , 748 n.8 (5th Cir. 1983) (en banc) (plurality), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 (1984); Menora v. Illinois High Sch.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daryl E. Singleterry
(2×)
See generally Dunagin v. City of Oxford, 718 F.2d 738 , 748 n. 8 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc) (plurality), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984); Menora v. Illinois High Sch.
examined
Cited "see"
Mohammad Zafar Tipu v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
(4×)
Rather, as the majority notes, a discretionary decision of the BIA may not be disturbed unless it is “arbitrary, irrational or contrary to law.” So Chun Chung v. INS, 602 F.2d 608, 612 (3d Cir.1979); accord Marroquin-Manriquez v. INS, 699 F.2d 129, 133 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
examined
Cited "see"
Hornell Brewing Co., Inc. v. Brady
(4×)
See Dunagin v. Oxford, 718 F.2d 738 , 747 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984); Oklahoma Telecasters Ass’n v. Crisp, 699 F.2d 490, 500 (10th Cir. 1983), rev’d on other grounds sub nom., Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. Crisp, 467 U.S. 691 , 104 S.Ct. 2694 , 81 L.Ed.2d 580 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Biddison v. City Of Chicago
(2×)
See Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 , 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989) 2 The ripeness doctrine is used by federal courts to "enforce prudential limitations upon their jurisdiction." Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 724 F.2d 1247, 1261 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rasool v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
(2×)
See Marroquin-Manriquez v. I.N.S., 699 F.2d 129 , 133 n. 5 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Teamsters Pension Trust Fund v. Laidlaw Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See Republic Industries v. Teamsters Joint Counsel, 718 F.2d 628 , 644 (4th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. *1027 3553, 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984); 17 Banner Indus., 657 F.Supp. at 884 . 18 In this case, the Funds have neither actively nor passively misled the Defendants with regard to the cause of action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Micro Motion, Incorporated v. Kane Steel Co., Inc., Cross/appellant
(2×)
See Marroquin-Manriquez v. INS, 699 F.2d 129, 134 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984) (the scope and conduct of discovery are within the sound discretion of the trial court). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ruiz v. Commissioner of the Department of Transportation
Accord Textile Workers Pension Fund v. Standard Dye & Finishing Co., 725 F.2d 843, 855 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984). *896 Plaintiffs do not challenge the clarity of the language in former section 211(10) itself.
discussed
Cited "see"
The Barbizon Corporation v. Ilgwu National Retirement Fund, Sol C. Chaikin and Joseph Moore, Defendants
(2×)
Ill 1985); see generally Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 724 F.2d 1247, 1255-56 (7th Cir.1983) (describing MPPAA and its effect on prior ERISA requirements), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ca'Paldo v. Prez
See Miner v. Brackney, 719 F.2d 954, 956 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 (1983); Todd v. Baskerville, 712 F.2d 70 (4th Cir.1983); Hamlin v. Warren, 664 F.2d 29 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 911 (1982). 12 Williams final contention, that the district court erred in failing to appoint counsel, is without merit.
discussed
Cited "see"
Flying Tiger Line v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund
(2×)
Nat’l Pension Fund, Plan A, A Benefits v. Clinton Engines Corp., 825 F.2d 415, 418 (D.C.Cir.1987) (“Clinton Engines”); accord Republic Indus., Inc. v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 of Va. Pension Fund, 718 F.2d 628 , 635 (4th Cir.1983) (MPPAA requires that “a nice [mixed] question of fact and law” must be decided by an arbitrator), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984); Chipman Trucking, 8 Employee Benefits Cas.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca3 1987
(2×)
Nat'l Pension Fund, Plan A, A Benefits v. Clinton Engines Corp., 825 F.2d 415, 418 (D.C.Cir.1987) ("Clinton Engines "); accord Republic Indus., Inc. v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 of Va. Pension Fund, 718 F.2d 628 , 635 (4th Cir.1983) (MPPAA requires that "a nice [mixed] question of fact and law" must be decided by an arbitrator), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984); Chipman Trucking, 8 Employee Benefits Cas.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re the Extradition of Singh
(2×)
See Marroquin-Manriquez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 699 F.2d 129, 134 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
H.C. Elliott, Inc. v. Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California
(2×)
See Republic Industries, Inc. v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 of Virginia Pension Fund, 718 F.2d 628, 641-42 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. 888 Corporation
(2×)
See Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 724 F.2d 1247, 1256 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984) 3 Section 558 provides in relevant part: Elimination of Retroactive Application of Amendments Made by Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980. (a) In general.-- (1) Liability.--Any withdrawal liability incurred by an employer pursuant to part 1 of subtitle E of title IV of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.) as a result of the complete or partial withdrawal of such employer from a multiemployer p…
discussed
Cited "see"
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. MGS Transportation, Inc.
(2×)
See Republic Industries, Inc. v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 of Virginia Pension Fund, 718 F.2d 628, 634 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984); F.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. 888 Corp.
(2×)
See Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 724 F.2d 1247, 1256 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Central States, Southwest & Southeast Areas Pension Fund
(2×)
See Republic Industries, Inc. v. Teamsters Joint Council, 718 F.2d 628 , 644 (4th Cir.1983) (“we think it equitable that when Republic has made a not frivolous challenge to the constitutionality of the arbitration process ... the pendency of the litigation should toll the running of the period prescribed in § 1401(a)(1)(B)”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984); Terson Co. v. Pension Ben.
discussed
Cited "see"
Posadas De Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Co. of Puerto Rico
(2×)
See Dunagin v. City of Oxford, Miss., 718 F. 2d 738, 752-753 (CA5 1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 467 U. S. 1259 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oklahoma Broadcasters Ass'n v. Crisp
(2×)
See Oklahoma Telecasters Ass’n. v. Crisp, 699 F.2d 490 (10th Cir.1983), (“Oklahoma Telecasters”), rev’d. on other grounds sub nom., Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. Crisp, 467 U.S. 691 , 104 S.Ct. 2694 , 81 L.Ed.2d 580 (1984) and Dunagin v. City of Oxford, Miss., 718 F.2d 738 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984) (“Dunagin ”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robbins v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.
See Republic Industries, Inc. v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83, 718 F.2d 628 , 640 n. 13 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984); Board of Trustees of the Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund v. Thompson Building Materials, Inc., 749 F.2d 1396, 1403-04 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 2116 , 85 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Luis Vides-Vides v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Marroquin-Manriquez v. INS, 699 F.2d [129, 131 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, [— U.S.-] 104 S.Ct. 3553 [ 82 L.Ed.2d 855 ] (1984) ].
cited
Cited "see"
Combs v. Western Coal Corp.
Accord, Republic Industries, Inc. v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 of Virginia Pension Fund, 718 F.2d 628, 639-42 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harrison v. State
See Dunagin v. City of Oxford, Miss., 489 F.Supp. 763 , 771-72 n. 11 (N.D.Miss.1980), aff'd 718 F.2d 738 (5th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984); Felix v. Milliken, 463 F.Supp. 1360, 1371-72 (E.D.Mich.1978); Republican College Council of Pennsylvania v. Winner, 357 F.Supp. 739, 740 (E.D.Pa.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local 638 ... Local 28 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n
See also Arthur v. Nyquist, 712 F.2d 816, 823 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3555 , 82 L.Ed.2d 856 (1984) (upholding proportional layoff); Morgan v. O’Bryant, 671 F.2d 23 , 28 (1st Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 881 , 103 S.Ct. 178 , 74 L.Ed.2d 146 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
D
V 1993); see also Marroquin-Manriquez v. INS, 699 F.2d 129, 135 (3d Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 (1984); Matter of Velasquez, supra. In stating that he was unable to have certain witnesses in attendance due to the rescheduling of his hearing, the respondent apparently contends that he should have been granted a continuance so that the witnesses could appear to testify on his behalf.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Advertising Company v. Town Of Babylon
(2×)
See, e.g., Dunagin v. City of Oxford, 718 F.2d 738 , 748 n. 8 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc) ("the decision on whether a regulation of commercial speech directly advances the state's interest ... is an exercise of constitutional adjudication wherein appellate courts play a special role"), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984). 16 While acknowledging that substantial governmental interests exist in the promotion of aesthetics and traffic safety, the Eleventh Circuit in Dills v. City of Marietta, 674 F.2d 1377 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 905 , 103 S.Ct. 1873 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Advertising Co. v. Town of Babylon
(2×)
See, e.g., Dunagin v. City of Oxford, 718 F.2d 738 , 748 n. 8 (5th Cir.1983) (en banc) (“the decision on whether a regulation of commercial speech directly advances the state’s interest ... is an exercise of constitutional adjudication wherein appellate courts play a special role”), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3554 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Helen Debreceni, Etc. v. Merchants Terminal Corporation and Terminal Refrigeration and Warehousing Corporation
(2×)
See also Republic Industries, Inc. v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 of Virginia Pension Fund, 718 F.2d 628 , 641-42 & n. 16 (4th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984) (“Depending upon how the [MPPAA] is read, [the employer] may be required to make installment payments as they come due in order to avoid a default, which would have the effect of accelerating its total liability, or it may not be required to pay anything while *4 it exercises its right to review or arbitration.”)- We now hold that the district court correctly ruled that, under the te…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mayock v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
(2×)
See also Marroquin-Manriquez v. INS, 699 F.2d 129 , 136 fn. 11 (3rd Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1259 , 104 S.Ct. 3553 , 82 L.Ed.2d 855 (1984) (availability of information under FOIA would undercut the showing of need necessary under 8 C.F.R. § 287.4 (a)(2)). 2 .
Marroquin-Manriguez
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 82-1649.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 25, 1984.
Cited by 168 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.