2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Parness v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parness v. United States Anchor | green | “the relevant market is 'not in issue' in an attempt or conspiracy to monopolize case” | 3 |
| 2 | Hamm v. Commissioner | green | “the relevant market is 'not in issue' in an attempt or conspiracy to monopolize case” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.