green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Freschi v. Grand Coal Venture
But cf. Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1358 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (Í983); Mauriber v. Shear-son/American Express, 567 F.Supp. 1231, 1240 (S.D.N.Y.1983).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Kaufman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
But cf. Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1358 (7th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983); Mauriber v. Shearson/American Express, 567 F.Supp. 1231, 1240 (S.D.N.Y.1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Antar
As such, the court held that the right of access clearly encompasses voir dire proceedings, so that closure "must be rare and only for cause shown that outweighs the value of openness." Id.; 104 S.Ct. at 509.
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Co.
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Thorsted v. Gregoire
See Joyner v. Mofford, 706 F.2d 1523, 1527 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Milwaukee Concrete Studios, Limited v. Fjeld Manufacturing Company, Incorporated, and Janice Krueger
(2×)
See Pitts v. Unarco Indus., Inc., 698 F.2d 313 (7th Cir.) ("The clear language of Section 362(a)(1) thus extends the automatic stay provision only to the debtor filing bankruptcy proceedings and not to non-bankrupt co-defendants.”), cer t. denied, 464 U.S. 1003 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983); see also In re lames Wilson Assoc., 965 F.2d 160, 170 (7th Cir.1992); Maritime Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Contractors Ass'n of Eastern Pennsylvania v. City of Philadelphia
See loyner v. Mofford, 706 F.2d 1523, 1527 (9th Cir.) (elected member of county Board of Supervisors had standing only to challenge application of Arizona statute barring salaried officeholders from running for elections to other elected Supervisors), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983); United States v. Lemons, 697 F.2d 832, 837 (8th Cir.1983) (homosexual convicted of sodomy in a public place under Arkansas statute had no standing to challenge statute on the ground it could not constitutionally be applied in a private place). .
cited
Cited "see"
Lillicrap v. Martin
See Pitts v. Unarco Industries, Inc., 712 F.2d 276, 279 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1003 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Eisenberg v. Feiner (In Re Ahead by a Length, Inc.)
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Wedtech Corp. v. Hurdman (In Re Wedtech Corp.)
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1347-48 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Robertson v. White
See, Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Indiana State Employees Ass'n v. Indiana Republican State Central Committee
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1352 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Ind. St. Employees Ass'n v. Ind. Repub. St. Cent.
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1352 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Company v. Kaplan
See Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. Kaplan, 712 F.2d 270 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. Kaplan
See Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. Kaplan, 712 F.2d 270 (7th Cir.1983), cert, denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 .
cited
Cited "see"
Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Vigman
See Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1358-59 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983); Harper v. New Japan Sec.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State Ex Rel. Carenbauer v. Hechler
(4×)
See Clements, 457 U.S. at 968 , 102 S.Ct. 2836 ; Donnahoe, 174 W.Va. at 33-34 , 321 S.E.2d at 684 ; see also Joyner v. Mofford, 706 F.2d 1523, 1531 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983) (rejecting argument that fourth qualification for office was being imposed by Arizona "resign-to-run" provision "because it does not prevent an elected state officeholder from running for federal office" and justifying this "indirect burden on potential candidates for Congress" as permissible regulation of state officeholders); Signorelli v. Evans, 637 F.2d 853, 859 (2d…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Hill
See, e.g., Joyner v. Mofford, 706 F.2d 1523 (9th *357 Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1002 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Knox v. AC & S, Inc.
See, e.g., Pitts v. Unarco Indus., Inc., 712 F.2d 276, 280 (7th Cir.1983) (In Pitts plaintiff settled prior to trial with all defendants against whom her claim was not barred by the statute of limitations) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1003 , 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983); Covalt v. Carey Canada, Inc., 543 N.E.2d 382, 387 (Ind.1989). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Toraki Matsumoto v. Raymond K. Pua, City Clerk, City and County of Honolulu, and Democratic Party of the State of Hawaii, and James Kumagai, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellees. Toraki Matsumoto v. United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, and Raymond K. Pua, City Clerk, City and County of Honolulu, Real Party in Interest, and Democratic Party of the State of Hawaii, and James Kumagai, Real Parties in Interest
See, e.g., Anderson, 460 U.S. at 789 , 103 S.Ct. at 1570 ; Clements v. Fashing, 457 U.S. 957, 963-66 , 102 S.Ct. 2836, 2843-45 , 73 L.Ed.2d 508 (1982) (plurality decision); see also Joyner v. Mofford, 706 F.2d 1523, 1531-32 (9th Cir.) (noting the existence of different levels of scrutiny, but finding it unnecessary to decide the level of scrutiny applicable to a law requiring certain state officials to resign from office before running for federal office because the law would pass constitutional muster under any test), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matsumoto v. Pua
See, e.g., Anderson, 460 U.S. at 789 , 103 S.Ct. at 1570 ; Clements v. Fashing, 457 U.S. 957, 963-66 , 102 S.Ct. 2836, 2843-45 , 73 L.Ed.2d 508 (1982) (plurality decision); see also Joyner v. Mofford, 706 F.2d 1523, 1531-32 (9th Cir.) (noting the existence of different levels of scrutiny, but finding it unnecessary to decide the level of scrutiny applicable to a law requiring certain state officials to resign from office before running for fed eral office because the law would pass constitutional muster under any test), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
ALEXANDER GRANT AND COMPANY, Appellant, v. TIFFANY INDUSTRIES, INC., Farrell Kahn and Gail Martin, Appellees
See, e.g., Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1356-58 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roche v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1353 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983); Bennett v. Berg, 685 F.2d 1053, 1063 (8th Cir.1982), cert, denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 527 , 78 L.Ed.2d 710 (1983); In re Action Industries Tender Offer, 572 F.Supp. 846, 850-51 (E.D.Va.1983); Yancoski v. E.F.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hulse v. Hale Farms Development Corp.
See, e.g., Schact v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 , 1357 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1984); Bennett v. Berg, 685 F.2d at 1059 ; Prudential Lines, Inc. v. McKeon, No. 80 Civ. 5853 (S.D.N.Y., Apr. 21, 1982); Landmark Savings & Loan v. Loeb Rhoades, 527 F.Supp. 206, 208 (E.D.Mich.1981); Hellenic Lines, Ltd. v. O’Hearn, 523 F.Supp. 244, 248 (S.D.N.Y.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.
See also Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1352 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 509 , 78 L.Ed.2d 698 (1983) (liberal pleading policy of Federal Rules prevents dismissal of meritorious claims on technical grounds). 9 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joyner
v.
Mofford, Secretary of State of Arizona
v.
Mofford, Secretary of State of Arizona
No. 83-583.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 1983.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.