green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.4 score
“we note that the supreme court has dismissed for lack of a substantial federal question three appeals from state decisions upholding financial disclosure laws____ he statute challenged in this case, and the issues raised differ in important respects ....”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
League of Women Voters v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors
we note that the supreme court has dismissed for lack of a substantial federal question three appeals from state decisions upholding financial disclosure laws____ he statute challenged in this case, and the issues raised differ in important respects ....
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
The League Of Women Voters Of Nassau County v. Nassau County Board Of Supervisors
we note that the supreme court has dismissed for lack of a substantial federal question three appeals from state decisions upholding financial disclosure laws.... he statute challenged in this case, and the issues raised differ in important respects ....
discussed
Cited "see"
Fraternal Order Of Police, Lodge No. 5 v. City Of Philadelphia
See Barry v. City of New York, 712 F.2d 1554, 1559 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1017 , 104 S.Ct. 548 , 78 L.Ed.2d 723 (1983); Plante v. Gonzalez, 575 F.2d 1119, 1132-33 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979); see also Developments, Public Employees Financial Disclosure Law Requiring Detailed Disclosure from Low-Echelon Employees Not Unconstitutional, 62 Wash.U.L.Q. 337 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5 v. City of Philadelphia
See Barry v. City of New York, 712 F.2d 1554, 1559 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1017 , 104 S.Ct. 548 , 78 L.Ed.2d 723 (1983); Plante v. Gonzalez, 575 F.2d 1119, 1132-33 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1129 , 99 S.Ct. 1047 , 59 L.Ed.2d 90 (1979); see also Developments, Public Employees Financial Disclosure Law Requiring Detailed Disclosure from Low-Echelon Employees Not Unconstitutional, 62 Wash. U.L.Q. 337 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Michael Kuzma v. United States Postal Service
See Barry v. City of New York, 712 F.2d 1554, 1558-60 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1017 , 104 S.Ct. 548 , 78 L.Ed.2d 723 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Traughber v. Beauchane
See United States v. Anderson County, Tennessee, 705 F.2d 184, 186 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 548 , 78 L.Ed.2d 722 (1983) (in Anderson County, this court noted that "[t]he 'virtually unflagging obligation' of the federal forum to exercise its jurisdictional powers may be abdicated out of deference to parallel litigation in the state forum in only the most exceptional circumstances"). 1 Cf. Middlesex, 102 S.Ct. at 2515 ; Moore v. Sims, 442 U.S. at 426 , 99 S.Ct. at 2379 . 49 Appellees urge that a vital state interest exists in this case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Traughber v. Beauchane
See United States v. Anderson County, Tennessee, 705 F.2d 184, 186 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 548 , 78 L.Ed.2d 722 (1983) (in Anderson County, this court noted that “[t]he ‘virtually unflagging obligation’ of the federal forum to exercise its jurisdictional powers may be abdicated out of deference to parallel litigation in the state forum in only the most exceptional circumstances”). 1 Cf. Middlesex, 102 S.Ct. at 2515 ; Moore v. Sims, 442 U.S. at 426 , 99 S.Ct. at 2379 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re an Inquiry Concerning Agerter
(2×)
See Barry v. City of New York, 712 F.2d 1554, 1559 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 548 , 78 L.Ed.2d 723 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. United States of America Internal Revenue Service
Alexander, 993 F.2d at 1349 -50 (citing Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589 , 97 S.Ct. 869 , 51 L.Ed.2d 64 (1977), as distinguishing between “the right to make important decisions such as marriage, procreation, and child rearing, without the interference of government” and “the right to privacy ... in an individual’s interest in avoiding disclosures of personal matters”); see also Barry v. City of New York, 712 F.2d 1554, 1558-59 (2d Cir.) (also recognizing “autonomy” and “confidentiality” strands of right to privacy, citing Whalen), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1017 , 104 S.Ct. 548 , 78 L…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re State Police Litigation
Cases protecting this right have defined two specific types of privacy interests, “the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters, and ... the interest in independence in making certain kinds of important decisions.” Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589, 599-600 , 97 S.Ct. 869, 876 , 51 L.Ed.2d 64 (1977); see also Barry v. New York, 712 F.2d 1554 , 1558-59 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1017 , 104 S.Ct. 548 , 78 L.Ed.2d 723 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Treasury Employees Union v. U.S. Department of the Treasury
See Woodland, 940 F.2d at 138 ; DuPlantier v. United States, 606 F.2d 654 (5th Cir.1979); Plante, 575 F.2d at 1134 ; see also Barry v. City of New York, 712 F.2d 1554, 1559 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1017 , 104 S.Ct. 548 , 78 L.Ed.2d 723 (1983). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Treasury Employees Union v. U.S. Department Of The Treasury
See Woodland, 940 F.2d at 138 ; DuPlantier v. United States, 606 F.2d 654 (5th Cir.1979); Plante, 575 F.2d at 1134 ; see also Barry v. City of New York, 712 F.2d 1554, 1559 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1017 , 104 S.Ct. 548 , 78 L.Ed.2d 723 (1983) 3 The constitutional right of privacy at issue in the present case (discussed in Whalen, 429 U.S. at 598-99 , 97 S.Ct. at 876 ), like the right of privacy protected directly by the Fourth Amendment, is defined by (and extends only to) a person's "reasonable expectations." See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 143 , 99 S.Ct. 421, 430 , 58 L.Ed.2d 3…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sector Enterprises, Inc. v. DiPalermo
See also Slevin v. City of New York, 551 F.Supp. 917, 921 (S.D.N.Y.1982), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, sub nom., Barry v. City of New York, 712 F.2d 1554 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1017 , 104 S.Ct. 548 , 78 L.Ed.2d 723 (1983), in which the court ruled that “[hjonest government is so patently a worthy objective, and the capacity for venality in human behavior is so profound and ingenious, that virtually any disclosure law however intrusive might be rationally justifiable.” The fact that Igneri , and for that matter Slevin and Barry, arose in the privacy— and not First Amendment …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Berger
v.
McMonagle, Judge
v.
McMonagle, Judge
No. 83-588.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 12, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2)
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.