green
Positive treatment
0.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Bear v. United States
In Tuscarora Indian Nation, 362 U.S. at 99 , 80 S.Ct. at 543 , the Supreme Court observed that “the obvious purpose of [ 25 U.S.C. § 177 ] is to prevent unfair, improvident or improper dispositions of land owned or possessed by Indians to other parties....” Id. at 119, 80 S.Ct. at 555 ; Schaghticoke Tribe of Indians v. Kent School Corp., 423 F.Supp. 780, 784 (1976); but see Mashpee Tribe v. Watt, 542 F.Supp. 797, 803 (D.Mass.1982), aff'd, 707 F.2d 23 (1st Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 555 , 78 L.Ed.2d 728 (1983) (purpose of section 177 was to prevent Indian uprisings and …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Burris v. Mahaney
See also Mashpee Tribe v. Watt, 542 F.Supp. 797 (D.C.Mass.1982), aff'd, 707 F.2d 23 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1020 , 104 S.Ct. 555 , 78 L.Ed.2d 728 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Forbes
v.
American Telephone & Telegraph
v.
American Telephone & Telegraph
No. 83-5758.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 12, 1983.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.