green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Fogleman
State v. Hughes, 587 So.2d 31, 43 (La.App. 2 Cir.1991), writ denied, 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992); see also Bujol v. Cain, 713 F.2d 112 (5 Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 726 , 79 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984) (listing above factors as well as a sixth factor: “evidence that the area was frequented by drug users”). 1 ¡Applying the supreme court holding in Toups and viewing the evidence before us in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could conclude that the state met its burden of proof in establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hunter
State v. Hughes, 587 So.2d 31, 43 (La.App. 2 Cir.1991), writ denied, 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992); see also Bujol v. Cain, 713 F.2d 112 (5 Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 726 , 79 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984) (listing above factors as well as a sixth factor: “evidence that the area was frequented by drug users”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Johnlouis
State v. Hughes, 587 So.2d 31, 43 (La.App. 2 Cir.1991), writ denied, 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992); see also Bujol v. Cain, 713 F.2d 112 (5 Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 726 , 79 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984) (listing above factors as well as a sixth factor: “evidence that the area was frequented by drug users”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jacobs
State v. Hughes, 587 So.2d 31, 43 (La.App. 2 Cir.1991), writ denied, 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992); see also Bujol v. Cain, 713 F.2d 112 (5 Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 726 , 79 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984) (listing above factors as well as a sixth factor: “evidence that the area was frequented by drug users”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Turner
State v. Hughes, 587 So.2d 31, 43 (La.App. 2 Cir.1991), writ denied, 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992); see also Bujol v. Cain, 713 F.2d 112 (5 Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 726 , 79 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984) (listing above factors as well as a sixth factor: "evidence that the area was frequented by drug users").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dowell
State v. Hughes, 587 So.2d 31, 43 (La.App. 2 Cir.1991), writ denied, 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992); see also Bujol v. Cain, 713 F.2d 112 (5 Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 726 , 79 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984) (listing above factors as well as a sixth factor: “evidence that the area was frequented by drug users”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Toups
State v. Hughes, 587 So.2d 31, 43 (La.App. 2 Cir.1991), writ denied, 590 So.2d 1197 (La.1992); see also Bujol v. Cain, 713 F.2d 112 (5 Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 726 , 79 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984) (listing above factors as well as a sixth factor: "evidence that the area was frequented by drug users").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Thompson
“In order to find an abuse of discretion, it is necessary to conclude that the record permits no interpretation other than that ‘the minds of the inhabitants of the county ... are so prejudiced against the defendant that a fair trial cannot be had therein.’ § 545.430; see also Rule 32.04(a).” State v. Molasky, 655 S.W.2d 663, 666 (Mo.App.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 727 , 79 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Haywood v. State
See also Ingram v. State , 437 So.2d 128 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982), cert. denied , 464 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 726 , 79 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984) (wherein the prosecutor's remarks that defendant had a "known print card" were found not to be clear evidence of another offense); Hicks v. State , 431 So.2d 583 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983) (wherein the prosecutor's comments were found not to be "improper insinuations" of the defendant being guilty of burglary.) Moreover, evidence of separate crimes is admissible if it tends to prove guilt of the crime for which the defendant is being tried and such " 'evidence is relevant a…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Haywood v. State
See also Ingram v. State, 437 So.2d 128 (Ala.Cr.App.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1049 , 104 S.Ct. 726 , 79 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984) (wherein the prosecutor’s remarks that defendant had a “known print card” were found not to be clear evidence of another offense); Hicks v. State, 431 So.2d 583 (Ala.Cr.App.1983) (wherein the prosecutor’s comments were found not to be “improper insinuations” of the defendant being guilty of burglary.) Moreover, evidence of separate crimes is admissible if it tends to prove guilt of the crime for which the defendant is being tried and such “ ‘evidence is…
McQueen
v.
Dixon
v.
Dixon
No. 83-5677.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1984.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.