green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 10×
15.3 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Roberts v. Corizon Health Services
the failure to object to the magistrate's findings of fact prohibits an attack on appeal of the factual findings adopted by the district court except on grounds of plain error or manifest injustice.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bulls v. Estes
the failure to object to the magistrate's findings of fact prohibits an attack on appeal of the factual findings adopted by the district court except on grounds of plain error or manifest injustice.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Archilla v. Hassell
the failure to object to the magistrate's findings of fact prohibits an attack on appeal of the factual findings adopted by the district court except on grounds of plain error or manifest injustice.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Minter v. FCI Talladega Warden
the failure to object to the magistrate's findings of fact prohibits an attack on appeal of the factual findings adopted by the district court except on grounds of plain error or manifest injustice.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tannehill v. Romero
the failure to object to the magistrate's findings of fact prohibits an attack on appeal of the factual findings adopted by the district court except on grounds of plain error or manifest injustice.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brown v. Gordy
the failure to object to the magistrate's findings of fact prohibits an attack on appeal of the factual findings adopted by the district court except on grounds of plain error or manifest injustice.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Payne-Bey v. Ivey
the failure to object to the magistrate's findings of fact prohibits an attack on appeal of the factual findings adopted by the district court except on grounds of plain error or manifest injustice.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Higdon v. State of Alabama
the failure to object to the magistrate's findings of fact prohibits an attack on appeal of the factual findings adopted by the district court except on grounds of plain error or manifest injustice.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
James v. Jones
the failure to object to the magistrate's findings of fact prohibits an attack on appeal of the factual findings adopted by the district court except on grounds of plain error or manifest injustice.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jackson v. Gordy
the failure to object to the magistrate's findings of fact prohibits an attack on appeal of the factual findings adopted by the district court except on grounds of plain error or manifest injustice.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary M. v. North Lawrence Community School Corp.
See Thezan v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 708 F.2d 175, 180 (5th Cir.1983) (“It is a cardinal principal of jurisprudence that we are not allowed to speeu-late as to the thought processes of the jury.”) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050 , 104 S.Ct. 729 , 79 L.Ed.2d 189 (1984); U.S. v. Russo, 796 F.2d 1443, 1450 (11th Cir.1986) (“We will not look behind the verdicts for evidence of jury confusion.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Willie J. Waites, Jr. v. Farrell Lines, Inc.
See Thezan v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 708 F.2d 175, 182 (5th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Brian K. Black v. Hieb's Enterprises, Inc.
See Thezan v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 708 F.2d 175, 182-83 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050 , 104 S.Ct. 729 , 79 L.Ed.2d 189 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. Stewart
Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776 , 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir. 1983) (per curiam), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050 (1984); Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ford v. Estes
Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776 , 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993); see also United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir. 1983) (per curiam), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050 (1984); Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Ex Rel. Gladney v. Peters
See, e.g., Lampkins v. Gagnon, 710 F.2d 374, 375 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050 , 104 S.Ct. 729 , 79 L.Ed.2d 189 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keith A. Mira v. Ronald C. Marshall
The parties have “the duty to pinpoint those portions of the magistrate’s report that the district court must specially consider.” Id. at 410 (footnote omitted); see also United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050 , 104 S.Ct. 729 , 79 L.Ed.2d 189 (1984).
Conger
v.
Louisiana
v.
Louisiana
No. 83-5719.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. Alabama (10)
Sup. Ct. La. Certio-rari denied.