green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Westphal v. Waukesha Dresser/Waukesha Engine Division
See Herman v. Nat’l Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 606 (7th Cir.1984) (citing Dickerson v. Deluxe Check Printers, Inc., 703 F.2d 276, 283 (8th Cir.1983)), ce rt. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Herber v. Boatmen's Bank of Tennessee
See Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Timothy Janowiak v. The Corporate City of South Bend
Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); see Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon
See Battipaglia v. New York State Liquor Authority, 745 F.2d 166, 174-75 (2d Cir.1984) (mere exchange of price information is not itself violative of the antitrust laws), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1027 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A.
See Battipaglia v. New York State Liquor Authority, 745 F.2d 166, 174-75 (2d Cir. 1984) (mere exchange of price information is not itself violative of the antitrust laws), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1027 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Brudne v. Amalgamated Trust & Savings Bank
See Herman v. NBC, 744 F.2d 604, 606 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Madison v. Frazier
The Court has read the parties’ briefs and the materials submitted in support thereof. *1060 STANDARD OF REVIEW A motion for summary judgment must be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cer…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brady-Lunny v. Massey
STANDARD A motion for summary judgment must be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indiana Insurance v. Pana Community Unit School District No. 8
STANDARD A motion for summary judgment must be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indiana Ins. Co. v. PANA COMM. UNIT SCH. DIST. 8
STANDARD A motion for summary judgment must be granted "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stone v. Sangamon County Sheriff's Department
For the reasons that follow, the Court will not address this latter contention.) STANDARD A motion for summary judgment must be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilhite v. Illinois Power Co.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD A motion for summary judgment must .be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McGuire v. CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, ILL.
STANDARD A motion for summary judgment must be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kehrer v. City of Springfield
STANDARD A motion for summary judgment must be granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 607 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Canterbury Liquors & Pantry v. Sullivan
Compare Miller v. Hedlund, 813 F.2d 1344, 1351 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1061 , 108 S.Ct. 1018 , 98 L.Ed.2d 983 (1988) (invalidating comparable regulatory scheme) with Battipaglia v. New York State Liquor Auth., 745 F.2d 166, 175 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1027 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985) (upholding similar regulatory scheme).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Five Smiths, Inc. v. National Football League Players Ass'n
The court further notes that any doubt about whether Container Corp. applied the per se rule or the rule of reason has subsequently been eliminated by the Supreme Court's favorable citation of Justice Fortas’s concurring opinion in Container Corp. as support for the proposition that "the dissemination of price information is not itself a per se violation of the Sherman Act." Citizens & Southern National Bank, 422 U.S. at 113 , 95 S.Ct. at 2115 ; see also Battipaglia v. New York State Liquor Auth., 745 F.2d 166, 175 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1027 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McJunkin Corp. v. West Virginia Human Rights Commission
See also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., 744 F.2d 604, 606 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985); No *422 gar v. Henry F. Teichmann, Inc., 640 F.Supp. 365, 369 (W.D.Pa.1985), aff'd without opinion, 800 F.2d 1137 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reed v. Signode Corp.
See, e.g., Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc., 744 F.2d 604, 609 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ross CALDWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS, Defendant-Appellee
See also Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., 744 F.2d 604, 606 (7th Cir.1984) (citing Lawson approvingly), certiorari denied, — U.S. ---, 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Oxman v. WLS-TV
See, e.g., Herman v. National Broadcasting Co., 744 F.2d 604, 608 (7th Cir.1984), cert, denied. — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 1393 , 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vance
v.
Tennessee Valley Authority
v.
Tennessee Valley Authority
No. 84-961.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 4, 1985.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.