green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gerry
"Rule 403 is an extraordinary remedy which should be used only sparingly since it permits the trial court to exclude concededly probative evidence." United States v. Betancourt, 734 F.2d 750, 757 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1076 , 105 S.Ct. 574 , 83 L.Ed.2d 514 (1984); accord United States v. Plotke, 725 F.2d 1303, 1308 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 843 , 105 S.Ct. 151 , 83 L.Ed.2d 89 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Orrin Shaid, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Shaid, 730 F.2d 225 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 844 , 105 S.Ct. 151 , 83 L.Ed.2d 89 (1984). 8 As a result of the 1982 conviction, a parole violator detainer was lodged against Shaid for violation of his parole and he was taken into custody on that basis.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Norton, United States of America v. Paul Fosco, James Pinckard, Paul A. Di Franco, James Norton, Defendants
“Rule 403 is an extraordinary remedy which should be used only sparingly since it permits the trial court to exclude concededly probative evidence.” United States v. Betancourt, 734 F.2d 750, 757 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1076 , 105 S.Ct. 574 , 83 L.Ed.2d 514 (1984); accord United States v. Plotke, 725 F.2d 1303, 1308 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 843 , 105 S.Ct. 151 , 83 L.Ed.2d 89 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonard Finestone
As we have cautioned, “Rule 403 is an extraordinary remedy which should be used only sparingly since it permits the trial court to exclude concededly probative evidence.” United States v. Betancourt, 734 F.2d 750, 757 (11th Cir.) (citing United States v. King, 713 F.2d 627, 631 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 942 , 104 S.Ct. 1924 , 80 L.Ed.2d 470 (1984)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1021 , 105 S.Ct. 440 , 83 L.Ed.2d 365 (1984), and 469 U.S. 1076 , 105 S.Ct. 574 , 83 L.Ed.2d 514 (1984); accord United States v. Plotke, 725 F.2d 1303, 1308 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 843 , 105 S.Ct…
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Henry E. McClanahan
See generally United States v. Shaid, 730 F.2d 225, 227-29 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 151 , 83 L.Ed.2d 89 (1984); Charter Bank Northwest v. Evanston Insurance Co., 791 F.2d 379 (5th Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Charter Bank Northwest v. Evanston Insurance Company
See United States v. Shaid, 730 F.2d 225 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 151 , 83 L.Ed.2d 89 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert B. Bowman
Bowman’s argument is unavailing. “[I]t is a well-established principle of mail fraud law that use of the mails after the money is obtained may nevertheless be ‘for the purpose of executing’ the fraud.” United States v. Ashdown, 509 F.2d 793, 799 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 829 , 96 S.Ct. 48 , 46 L.Ed.2d 47 (1975); see United States v. Shaid, 730 F.2d 225, 229-30 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 151 , 83 L.Ed.2d 89 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rogers
See also, United States v. Dawes, 874 F.2d 746, 750 (10th Cir.1989), United States v. Hack, 782 F.2d 862, 870 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 , 106 S.Ct. 2921 , 91 L.Ed.2d 549 (1986), United States v. O'Driscoll, 761 F.2d 589, 597 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 1207 , 89 L.Ed.2d 320 (1986). 85 As to Rogers' first contention that the sentence violated his Fifth Amendment right, "[i]t is well established that each use of the mails is a separate offense under the mail fraud statute and that consecutive sentences may be imposed properly, even if the mailings aros…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Driskill v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Plotke, 725 F.2d 1303 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub. nom. 469 U.S. 843 , 105 S.Ct. 151 , 83 L.Ed.2d 89 (1984); United States v. Johnson, 700 F.2d 699 (11th Cir.1983); Gordon, 634 F.2d 639 ; and United States v. Febre, 425 F.2d 107 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied 400 U.S. 849 , 91 S.Ct. 40 , 27 L.Ed.2d 87 (1970), where the doctrine was applied to obviate resentencing or a new trial where some of the conviction counts were reversed on appeal.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Saunders
v.
United States Postal Service
v.
United States Postal Service
No. 83-6854.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Cited by 40 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.