green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1996
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Minnis v. United States Dep't of Agric., 737 F.2d 784, 787 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. Bibles
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Minnis v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 737 F.2d 784, 787 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Elton E. Bryan, A/K/A Butch
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See SEC v. Materia, 745 F.2d 197, 201 (2d Cir.1984) (endeav *957 oring to “delineate the contours of what may still be perceived as a novel theory of liability under the antifraud provisions”), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Kathleen L. Eckstein, Administratrix of the Estate of Harry J. Eckstein, Jr. v. Kenneth E. Melson
See Olson v. Leeke, 744 F.2d 1061 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, [471] U.S. [1053, 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 ]. 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hasho
See SEC v. Materia, 745 F.2d 197, 203 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985). *1107 Scienter Scienter is “a mental state embracing intent to deceive, manipulate, or defraud.” Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 , 193-94 n. 12, 96 S.Ct. 1375 , 1381 n. 12, 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United Association Of Journeymen And Apprentices Of The Plumbing And Pipefitting Industry, Local 598 v. Department Of The Army, Corps Of Engineers, Walla Walla District
See Minnis v. United States Dep't of Agric., 737 F.2d 784, 787 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry, Local 598 v. Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
See Minnis v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 737 F.2d 784, 787 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Carpenter, Kenneth P. Felis, and R. Foster Winans
(2×)
See SEC v. Materia, 745 F.2d 197 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985); United States v. Newman, 664 F.2d 12 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd after remand, 722 F.2d 729 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 863 , 104 S.Ct. 193 , 78 L.Ed.2d 170 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Vernon Beigay, Inc. v. Traxler
See Olson v. Leeke, 744 F.2d 1061 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Vernon Beigay, Inc. v. Traxler
See Olson v. Leeke, 744 F.2d 1061 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985) 4 The Court stated: "Many decisions have recognized that these terms of obscenity statutes are not precise. [Footnote omitted.] This Court, however, has consistently held that lack of precision is not itself offensive to the requirements of due process. ' ... [T]he Constitution does not require impossible standards'; all that is required is that the language 'conveys sufficiently definite warning as to the proscribed conduct when measured by common understanding and practices...…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Faulkner v. National Geographic Society
Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure: Jurisdiction 2d § 4425, at 675 (2002); see also Minnis v. United States Dep’t of Agriculture, 737 F.2d 784 , 786 n. 1 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985). 67 . 18 Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Lorin
See also SEC v. Materia, 745 F.2d 197, 201 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985); SEC v. Manor Nursing Ctrs., Inc., 458 F.2d 1082, 1104 (2d Cir.1972) (“The effective enforcement of the federal securities laws requires that the SEC be able to make violations unprofitable.”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Esslinger v. Baltimore City
See also Minnis v. United States Dept. of Agriculture, 737 F.2d 784 (9th Cir.1984), cert, denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Don S. Peters
Compare United States v. Carpenter, 791 F.2d 1024, 1034 (2d Cir.1986) (employer was a financial newspaper), affirmed by equally divided Court, 484 U.S. 19, 24 , 108 S.Ct. 316, 319 , 98 L.Ed.2d 275 (1987) with SEC v. Materia, 745 F.2d 197, 203 (2d Cir.1984) (employer was a financial printer whose clients were public corporations involved in tender offers), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Peters
Compare United States v. Carpenter, 791 F.2d 1024, 1034 (2d Cir.1986) (employer was a financial newspaper), affirmed by equally divided Court, 484 U.S. 19, 24 , 108 S.Ct. 316, 319 , 98 L.Ed.2d 275 (1987) with SEC v. Materia, 745 F.2d 197, 203 (2d Cir.1984) (employer was a financial printer whose clients were public corporations involved in tender offers), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Labor Relations Authority v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
See, e.g., Minnis v. U.S. Dept. of Agric., 737 F.2d 784 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985); Heights Community Congress v. Veterans Admin., 732 F.2d 526 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1034 , 105 S.Ct. 506 , 83 L.Ed.2d 398 (1984); Wine Hobby USA, Inc. v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service, 502 F.2d 133 (3rd Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Labor Relations Authority v. United States Department Of Veterans Affairs
See, e.g., Minnis v. U.S. Dept. of Agric., 737 F.2d 784 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985); Heights Community Congress v. Veterans Admin., 732 F.2d 526 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1034 , 105 S.Ct. 506 , 83 L.Ed.2d 398 (1984); Wine Hobby USA, Inc. v. U.S. Internal Revenue Service, 502 F.2d 133 (3rd Cir.1974). 34 In sum, it cannot be said that one's name and address, coupled with that individual's status as a federal employee--the appropriate inquiry--is generally publicly available.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Willis
See Carpenter, 791 F.2d at 1029 (misappropriation theory proscribes the conversion by "’insiders’ or others of material non-public information in connection with the purchase or sale of securities”); see also SEC v. Materia, 745 F.2d 197, 201 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985) (Section 10(b) was not "aimed solely at the eradication of fraudulent trading by corporate insiders").
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Clark
See, e.g., SEC v. Materia, 745 F.2d 197, 201-02 (2d Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities and Exchange Commission v. John Naylor Clark, Iii, and Russell G. Van Moppes
See, e.g., SEC v. Materia, 745 F.2d 197, 201-02 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ca3 1988
See American Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Local 1760 v. FLRA, 786 F.2d 554 , 556 (2d Cir.1986) ("privacy interest of the average employee in his address is "not particularly compelling"); United States Dep't of the Air Force v. FLRA, 838 F.2d 229, 232 (7th Cir.1988) ("[b]oth the secrecy and the seclusion components of privacy ... are minuscule" where the data in question are already widely dissimenated); United States Dep't of Health and Human Services v. FLRA, 833 F.2d 1129 , 1135-36 (4th Cir.1987) (deferring to the FLRA's evaluation); USDA v. FLRA, 836 F.2d 1139 , 1143-44 (8th Cir.1988) ("emplo…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Department of Navy v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
See American Fed’n of Gov’t Employees, Local 1760 v. FLRA, 786 F.2d 554 , 556 (2d Cir.1986) (“privacy interest of the average employee in his address is “not particularly compelling’’); United States Dep’t of the Air Force v. FLRA, 838 F.2d 229, 232 (7th Cir.1988) (“[b]oth the secrecy and the seclusion components of privacy ... are minuscule” where the data in question are already widely dissimenated); United States Dep’t of Health and Human Services v. FLRA, 833 F.2d 1129, 1135-36 (4th Cir.1987) (deferring to the FLRA’s evaluation); USDA v. FLRA, 836 F.2d 1139 , 1143-44 …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
David Gary Hoover v. Don Byrd, Sheriff of Dallas County Texas
See also Olson v. Leeke, 744 F.2d 1061 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985) (upholding South Carolina statute with similar language).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DiPersia v. U.S. Railroad Retirement Board
See, e.g., Minnis v. United States Department of Agriculture, 737 F.2d 784, 787 (9 Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985); American Federation of Government Employees v. United States Department of Health, 712 F.2d 931, 932 (4 Cir.1983) (per curiam); Wine Hobby USA, Inc. v. United States Internal Revenue Service, 502 F.2d 133, 137 (3 Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Santoro
See, e.g., S.E.C. v. Materia, 745 F.2d 197 (2d Cir.1984) (employee of financial printing company), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 2112 , 85 L.Ed.2d 477 (1985); United States v. Newman, 664 F.2d 12 (2d Cir.1981) (securities trader tipped by employee of investment banking firm); United States v. Carpenter, 791 F.2d 1024 (2d Cir.1986) (financial reporter); United States v. Reed, 601 F.Supp. 685 (S.D.N.Y.) (son of corporate director), rev'd in part on other grounds, 773 F.2d 477 (2d Cir.1985).
Jack S. FOSTER
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 84-1063.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 1985.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.