green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1995 ·
…the collective bargaining agreement from which moore's transfer rights arise, requires that moore resort to the grievance procedures set forth in the agreement
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Potter v. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc.
the collective bargaining agreement from which moore's transfer rights arise, requires that moore resort to the grievance procedures set forth in the agreement
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Potter v. Associated Electric Co-Op
the collective bargaining agreement from which moore's transfer rights arise, requires that moore resort to the grievance procedures set forth in the agreement
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosa Francisco
See United States v. Brainard, 690 F.2d 1117, 1122 (4th Cir.1982) (stating that closing arguments may include reasonable inferences from the evidence), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2320 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth J. Masat
See United States v. Przybyla, 737 F.2d 828, 829 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2320 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985) (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adkins v. State
See United States v. Brainard, 690 F.2d 1117, 1123 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2320 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985), citing United States v. Thomas, 571 F.2d 285, 288 (5th Cir.1978) (where attorney expressly indicated that client would assert privilege under the Fifth Amendment); but see United States v. MacCloskey, 682 F.2d 468, 477-8 (4th Cir.1982) (“The rule requires, however, that the court first rule the declarant exempt from testifying on the ground of privilege.”); see also Roberts v. United States, 445 U.S. 552 , 560 n. 7, 100 S.Ct. 1358 , 1364 n. 7, 63 L.Ed.2d …
discussed
Cited "see"
Jeffers v. Convoy Co.
(2×)
See Moore v. General Motors Corp., 739 F.2d 311 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 2320 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Muenchow v. Parker Pen Co.
See Moore v. General Motors Corp., 739 F.2d 311 (8th Cir.1984) cert. denied — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 2320 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985) (holding that federal labor law preempted plaintiff’s claims that the defendant employer had engaged in negligent misrepresentation and fraud by inducing her to sell her St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gates v. Tenzer
Where an asserted state law claim is “substantially dependent upon an analysis of the terms of an agreement made between the parties in a labor contract,” it must either be treated as a § 301 claim or be dismissed as preempted by the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board, 105 S.Ct. at 1916 ; see also Moore v. General Motors Corp., 739 F.2d 311 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1099 , 105 S.Ct. 2320 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1984); but see Anderson v. Ford Motor Co., 803 F.2d 953 (8th Cir.1986) (where rights and obligations asserted by plaintiffs do not derive from collecti…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Hussmann Corp.
See also Moore v. General Motors Corp., 739 F.2d 311, 315 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 105 S.Ct. 2320 , 85 L.Ed.2d 839 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society
v.
Lasso
v.
Lasso
No. 84-821.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (2)
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.