green
Positive treatment
8.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 43 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Smith v. Nixon
But cf. Zweibon v. Mitchell ("Zweibon IV "), 720 F.2d 162, 171 (D.C.Cir.1983) (dictum) (court is "reticent" to permit plaintiffs "to benefit from the fruits of discovery that took place before Harlow was decided"), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Smith ex rel. Smith v. Nixon
But cf. Zweibon v. Mitchell (“Zwei bon IV”), 720 F.2d 162, 171 (D.C.Cir.1983) (dictum) (court is “reticent” to permit plaintiffs “to benefit from the fruits of discovery that took place before Harlow was decided”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Nationwide Sports Distributors, Inc.
Moreover, “[t]he Trustee [or debtor in possession], as proponent of the proposed settlement, has the burden of persuasion that the settlement is in the best interest of the estate.” In re Bell & Beckwith, 93 B.R. 569, 574 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio.1988); see Matter of AWECO, Inc., 725 F.2d 293 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984); In re Neshaminy Office Bldg.
cited
Cited "see"
Alton Hornback v. United States
See McKeel v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 722 F.2d 582, 590 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America v. Darus H. ZEHRBACH, Appellant in No. 93-7477. Alex A. Mervis, Appellant in No. 93-7493
(2×)
See Maj.Op. at 1265, citing United States v. Jannotti, 729 F.2d 213, 219-20 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 244, 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re MCorp Financial, Inc.
See In re AWECO, Inc., 725 F.2d 293 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Darris A. Crenshaw v. Billy Hayes, Psych Attendant, Thomas Richards, Superintendent and Anthony Pazzara, G.S.C. Director
See United States v. Gutman, 725 F.2d 417, 420 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 (1984); In re Penn, 443 F.2d 663, 666 (D.C.Cir.1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Estate of Ferdinand E. Marcos Human Rights Litigation. Agapita Trajano Archimedes Trajano v. Ferdinand E. Marcos, and Imee Marcos-Manotoc
See McKeel v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 722 F.2d 582, 588 (9th Cir.1983) (Congress did not intend to assert jurisdiction over foreign states for events occurring wholly within their own territory), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, in 91-1201 v. Thomas L. McGill Jr., in 91-1122
(2×)
See United States v. Jannotti, 729 F.2d 213 , 220 n. 2 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Rogers v. United States
See Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558, 1566 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); Murray v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 71, 74 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Wise v. Ruffin
See Belland v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 726 F.2d 839, 843 (D.CiCir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Gary G. Wise, Perry C. Harvey, Jr., John Bradshaw, Jr., Benjamin Flowers, Alton Jernigan, Don Klages, John MacKey John Roberts, Willie Sloan, Charles Spencer, John Wightman, in Their Capacities as Trustees for the South Atlantic Ila/employers District Escrow Fund and in Their Capacities as Trustees for the South Atlantic Ila/employers Gai Fund v. Peter B. Ruffin, Jack Tilley, John E. Dyer, Willie Sloan, William Piner, Nelson Adams, Clemmon L. Jacobs, Robert Hutchens, R. Blaine Brickhouse, in Their Capacities as Trustees for the Employers International Longshoremen's Association Afl/cio Pension Fund for the North Carolina Ports Area, Almont Shipping Company, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation, Stevedores, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation v. Peter Browne Ruffin, Ward King, John E. Dyer, Willie Sloan, William Piner, Henry Arron Rose, in Their Capacities as Trustees for the Employers-Ila Pension, Welfare & Vacation Fund for the North Carolina Ports Area, Almont Shipping Company, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation, Stevedores, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation v. Peter Browne Ruffin, Ward King, John E. Dyer, Willie Sloan, William Piner, Henry Arron Rose, in Their Capacities as Trustees for the Employers-Ila Pension, Welfare & Vacation Fund for the North Carolina Ports Area
See Belland v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 726 F.2d 839, 843 (D.C.Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, in No. 89-5510 v. Gaetano Vastola, in No. 89-5372 v. Elias Saka, in No. 89-5383
See United States v. Jannotti, 729 F.2d 213 , 219-20 n. 2 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984) (defining the “high probability” standard of appellate review used to determine the harmlessness of nonconstitutional errors in the admission of evidence); Government of the Virgin Islands v. Toto, 529 F.2d 278, 284 (3d Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James L. Pratt, Jr.
Accord United States v. Jannotti, 729 F.2d 213, 224 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Cavin v. United States
See McKeel v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 722 F.2d 582, 591 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Kuzniar and George Pistas
(2×)
See United States v. Gutman, 725 F.2d 417, 435 (7th Cir.) (Coffey, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); Holland v. Allied Structural Steel Co., 539 F.2d 476, 483 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1105 , 97 S.Ct. 1136 , 51 L.Ed.2d 557 (1977); see also 3 J.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Spotted War Bonnet
(2×)
See United States v. Schoefield, 465 F.2d 560, 562 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 881 , 93 S.Ct. 210 , 34 L.Ed.2d 136 (1972). 7 Cf. United States v. Gutman, 725 F.2d 417, 420 (7th Cir.) (court has the duty to conduct voir dire when witness’ insanity has rendered questionable his competence to testify), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United Steelworkers v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (In Re Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.)
ERISA section 4002, 29 U.S.C. § 1302 ; see Belland v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 726 F.2d 839 , 843 & n. 4 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 [ 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 ] (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp.
ERISA section 4002, 29 U.S.C. § 1302 ; see Belland v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 726 F.2d 839 , 843 & n. 4 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Sec. 1302 ; see Belland v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 726 F.2d 839 , 843 & n. 4 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984). 37 The purpose of a Chapter 11 reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code "is to restructure a business's finances so that it may continue to operate, provide its employees with jobs, pay its creditors, and produce a return for its stockholders." H.R.Rep.
cited
Cited "see"
Snyder v. Baumecker
See Angleton v. Pierce, 574 F.Supp. 719 , 723 n. 1 (D.N.J.1983), aff’d mem., 734 F.2d 3 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Yaffa Levy, A/K/A \Annette Amar\"
Thus, in reviewing the district court's decision to admit Yehuda's statements under Ammar, our inquiry is restricted to "whether, viewing the [other] evidence in the light most favorable to the government, the district court had 'reasonable grounds' for concluding that, more probably than not, [the defendants] were coconspirators." United States v. Inadi, 748 F.2d 812, 817 (3d Cir.), rev'd on other grounds, 475 U.S. 387 , 106 S.Ct. 1121 , 89 L.Ed.2d 390 (1986); see United States v. Janotti, 729 F.2d 213, 218 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 244, 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984)…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Levy
Thus, in reviewing the district court’s decision to admit Yehuda’s statements under Ammar , our inquiry is restricted to “whether, viewing the [other] evidence in the light most favorable to the government, the district court had ‘reasonable grounds’ for concluding that, more probably than not, [the defendants] were cocon-spirators.” United States v. Inadi, 748 F.2d 812, 817 (3d Cir.), rev’d on other grounds, 475 U.S. 387 , 106 S.Ct. 1121 , 89 L.Ed.2d 390 (1986); see United States v. Janotti, 729 F.2d 213, 218 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 244, 83 L.…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Felix Rodriguez
Accord United States v. Jannotti, 729 F.2d 213, 224 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984); United States v. Wolffs, 594 F.2d 77, 80 (5th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stansel v. American Security Bank
See United States v. Jannotti, 729 F.2d 213, 226 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984); Banque Worms v. Luis A. Duque Pena e Hijos, Ltda., 652 F.Supp. 770, 772-773 (S.D.N.Y.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Thompson v. United States
See Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558, 1566 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); Murray v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 71, 74 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Harris v. United States
See Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558, 1566 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); Murray v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 71, 74 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Willie H. Harris, Ernestine Harris v. Polskie Linie Lotnicze, AKA Lot Polish Airlines, a Corporation, Defendant
See McKeel v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 122 F.2d 582, 586-87 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morton H. Halperin v. Henry A. Kissinger
See Zweibon v. Mitchell (“Zweibon IV"), 720 F.2d 162 , 173 n. 18 (D.C.Cir.1983), cert, denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984); Chagnon v. Bell, 642 F.2d 1248 , 1262 n. 25 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert, denied, 453 U.S. 911 , 101 S.Ct. 3142 , 69 L.Ed.2d 994 (1981); cf. United States v. Brown, 484 F.2d 418, 426 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 960 , 94 S.Ct. 1490 , 39 L.Ed.2d 575 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eileen Bailey v. Grand Trunk Lines New England, Canadian National Railway, Midline Division, St. Lawrence Region
Peruana de Vapores, S.A., 660 F.2d 61 , 63-64 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 926 , 102 S.Ct. 1971 , 72 L.Ed.2d 441 (1982); Williams v. Shipping Corp. of India, 653 F.2d 875, 880-81 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 982 , 102 S.Ct. 1490 , 71 L.Ed.2d 691 (1982); see McKeel v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 722 F.2d 582 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Campesinos Unidos, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor, Center for Employment Training, Intervenor-Respondent
See McKeel v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 722 F.2d 582, 587 (9th Cir.1983) (rejecting a literal reading of a statute because the *1070 intent of Congress was to the contrary), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Roche v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
See United States v. Jannotti, 729 F.2d 213, 226 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nolan-Cooper
See, e.g., United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982), 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 244, 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984); United States v. Voigt, 89 F.3d 1050, 1070 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 623 , 136 L.Ed.2d 546 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. United States
Plaintiffs must also “overcome the strong, but rebuttable, presumption that administrators of the military, like other public officials, discharge their duties correctly, lawfully, and in good faith.” Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285, 302 , 594 F.2d 804, 813-4 (1979); see also Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. United States
Plaintiffs also must “overcome the strong, but rebuttable, presumption that administrators of the military, like other public officials, discharge their duties correctly, lawfully, and in good faith.” Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285, 302 , 594 F.2d 804, 813-4 (1979); see also Bockoven v. United States, [Bockoven v. Marsh] 727 F.2d 1558 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rice v. United States
See, e.g., Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558, 1563 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); Engels v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 465 , 678 F.2d 173 (1982); Greig v. United States, 226 Ct.Cl. 258 , 640 F.2d 1261 , cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); Hary v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 10 , 618 F.2d 704 (1980); Guy v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 427 , 608 F.2d 867 (1979) ; Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285 , 594 F.2d 804 (1979); King v. United States, 19 Cl.Ct. 703 (1990), aff'd, 918 F.2d 186 (Fed.Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. United States
See also Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558, 1563 (Fed.Cir.), cert, denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984), where the Federal Circuit recently stated that highly trained and disciplined Army officers should be presumed to have followed direct orders to disregard any information not properly before them in making their selection decisions. 9 Cl.Ct. 463, 472 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.
In re Public Service Co., 114 B.R. 820, 827 (Bkrtcy.D.N.H.1990), stay denied, In re Public Service Co., 116 B.R. 347 (Bkrtcy.D.N.H.1990); see also, In re AWECO, Inc., 725 F.2d 293 (5th Cir.1984), reh. denied, In re AWECO, Inc., 732 F.2d 941 (5th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, AWECO, Inc. v. United States, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kirwin v. United States
See, e.g., Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558,1563 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); Sanders, supra, 219 Ct.Cl. at 302 , 594 F.2d at 813 ; Smith v. United States, 19 Cl.Ct. 19, 26 (1989), aff'd, 914 F.2d 271 (Fed.Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
For RICO conspiracy purposes, "[i]t is well-established that one conspirator need not know the identities of all his co-conspirators, nor be aware of all the details of the conspiracy in order to be found to have agreed to participate in it." United States v. Riccobene, 709 F.2d 214, 225 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 849 , 104 S.Ct. 157 , 78 L.Ed.2d 145 (1983); see also United States v. Jannotti, 729 F.2d 213, 226 (3d Cir.1984) (government must show person enabled to commit predicate offenses solely by virtue of his involvement in enterprise, or that predicate offenses are related to enter…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Zauber
For RICO conspiracy purposes, “[i]t is well-established that one conspirator need not know the identities of all his co-conspirators, nor be aware of all the details of the conspiracy in order to be found to have agreed to participate in it.” United States v. Riccobene, 709 F.2d 214, 225 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 849 , 104 S.Ct. 157 , 78 L.Ed.2d 145 (1983); see also United States v. Jannotti, 729 F.2d 213, 226 (3d Cir.1984) (government must show person enabled to commit predicate offenses solely by virtue of his involvement in enterprise, or that predicate offenses are related to e…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pierre Michel Henri Giry and Steven Seward
Factual impossibility is no defense.” United States v. Senatore, 509 F.Supp. 1108, 1110 (E.D.Pa.1981) (statutory citations omitted); see also United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 591 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982), aff'd on later appeal, 729 F.2d 213 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 243 , 83 L.Ed.2d 182 (1984) (“Because an agreement between two or more persons to commit criminal acts poses, in and of itself, a serious danger to social order, it is proscribed by the law of conspiracy ...
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
mandamus is the proper remedy State ex rel. Lloyd v. Clayton
While it is true that the bankruptcy court has jurisdiction to determine whether a settlement between the debtor and other parties is fair and equitable,22 "looking only to the fairness of the settlement as between the debtor and the settling claimant [and ignoring third-party rights] contravenes a basic notion of fairness." In re Aweco, Inc., 725 F.2d at 298; see also F.D.I.C. v. Jones (In re Jones), 966 F.2d 169, 173 (5th Cir.1992) (discussing § 105(a) and court's duty to avoid unfairness and 22 "The bankruptcy court derives its authority to approve settlements from Bankruptcy Rule 9019(a).…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McKeel
v.
Islamic Republic of Iran
v.
Islamic Republic of Iran
No. 83-1890.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1984.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.