green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Step by Step, Inc. v. City of Ogdensburg
See Gresham v. Windrush Partners, Ltd., 730 F.2d 1417, 1423-24 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 249 , 83 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984); see also Instant Air Freight Co. v. C.F.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Rowland
See Godwin v. Schramm, 731 F.2d 153, 160 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Behrend v. Godwin, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 250 , 83 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984); see also, Novelty Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Siskind, 500 Pa. 432 , 457 A.2d 502, 503 (1983) (“Equitable estoppel is a doctrine that prevents one from doing an act differently than the manner in which another was induced by word or deed to expect.... [It] recognizes that an informal promise implied by one’s words, deeds or representations which leads another to rely justifiably thereon to his own injury or detriment, may be enforced in equity.”)…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ruxton v. City of Philadelphia (In Re Ruxton)
See Godwin v. Schramm, 731 F.2d 153, 160 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Behrend v. Godwin, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 250 , 83 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984); see also, Novelty Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Siskind, 500 Pa. 432 , 457 A.2d 502, 503 (1983) (“Equitable estoppel is a doctrine that prevents one from doing an act differently than the manner in which another was induced by word or deed to expect... .[It] recognizes that an informal promise implied by one’s words, deeds or representations which leads another to rely justifiably thereon to his own injury or detriment, may be enforced in equity.”)…
discussed
Cited "see"
ReMed Recovery Care Centers v. Township of Willistown
See Rogers v. Windmill Pointe Village Club Assoc., 967 F.2d 525, 528-29 (11th Cir.1992) (per curiam, adopting district court order) (citing Gresham v. Windrush Partners, Ltd., 730 F.2d 1417, 1423-24 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 249 , 83 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984)); Assisted Living Assocs., 996 F.Supp. at 438-39 (collecting cases); Epicenter of Steubenville, 924 F.Supp. at 852 .
discussed
Cited "see"
First American Corp. v. Price Waterhouse LLP
See Fonseca v. Regan, 734 F.2d 944, 948 (2d Cir.1984) (“[W]here the information sought is not properly discoverable, it is axiomatic that a district court should not impose a Rule 37 sanction for a party’s failure to comply with an order to reveal such information.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 249 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
First American Corporation v. Price Waterhouse Llp
See Fonseca v. Regan, 734 F.2d 944, 948 (2d Cir.1984) ("[W]here the information sought is not properly discoverable, it is axiomatic that a district court should not impose a Rule 37 sanction for a party's failure to comply with an order to reveal such information."), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 249 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984). 34 Given these safeguards, we find entirely reasonable the district court's determination that the U.S. interest in this lawsuit outweighs the competing foreign interests in enforcement of local confidentiality laws.
discussed
Cited "see"
Okan's Foods, Inc. v. Windsor Associates Ltd. Partnership (In Re Okan's Foods, Inc.)
See Godwin v. Schramm, 731 F.2d 153, 160 (3d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Behrend v. Godwin, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 250 , 83 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984); see also, Novelty Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Siskind, 500 Pa. 432 , 457 A.2d 502, 503 (1983) (“Equitable estoppel is a doctrine that prevents one from doing an act differently than the manner in which another was induced by word or deed to expect.... [It] recognizes that an informal promise implied by one’s words, deeds or representations which leads another to rely justifiably thereon to his own injury or detriment, may be enforced in equity.”)…
cited
Cited "see"
Oxford House, Inc. v. Township of Cherry Hill
See Gresham v. Windrush Partners, Ltd., 730 F.2d 1417, 1423-24 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 249 , 83 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984); see also Instant Air Freight Co. v. C.F.
cited
Cited "see"
County of Henrico v. Ehlers
See Fonseca v. Regan, 734 F.2d 944 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 882 (1984); Dunbar v. United States, 502 F.2d 506 (5th Cir. 1974); Ferris v. United States, 501 F. Supp. 98 (D.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.
See Fonesca v. Regan, 734 F.2d 944 , 950 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 249 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984); see also Texas & P.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mason v. Commissioner
See Bradley v. United States, 730 F.2d 718 , 720 (11th Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 882 (1984) ; Golsen v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 742 (1970) , affd. 445 F.2d 985 (10th Cir. 1971) , cert. denied 404 U.S. 940 (1971) .
cited
Cited "see"
Multi-State Communications, Inc. v. United States
See Brontel, Ltd. v. City of New York, 571 F.Supp. 1065, 1067-68 (S.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd mem., 742 F.2d 1439 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 248 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Assisted Living Associates of Moorestown, L.L.C. v. Moorestown Township
See, e.g., Rogers v. Windmill Pointe Village Club Ass’n, Inc., 967 F.2d 525, 528-29 (11th Cir. 1992) (relying upon Gresham v. Windrush Partners, Ltd., 730 F.2d 1417, 1423 (11th Cir.) (Tuttle, J.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 249 , 83 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
JUDY B. v. Borough of Tioga
See, e.g., Gresham v. Windrush Partners, Ltd., 730 F.2d 1417, 1423-24 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 249 , 83 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stewart B. McKinney Foundation, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission
See, e.g., Gresham v. Windrush Partners, Ltd., 730 F.2d 1417, 1423 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 249 , 83 L.Ed.2d 187 (1984) (agreeing with district court that irreparable injury may be presumed from the fact of discrimination and violation of fair housing statutes); Baxter v. City of Belleville, III., 720 F.Supp. 720, 734 (S.D.Ill.1989) (stating Seventh Circuit has held that traditional showing of irreparable harm is not required when a plaintiff seeks equitable relief to prevent the violation of a federal statute which specifically provides for injunctive relief); Brons…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. 25 Cases, More or Less, of an Article of Device
See, e.g., United States v. Article of Device, 731 F.2d 1253 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 249 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984) (radiation detector used to locate problem areas of body on which chiropractors will concentrate qualifies as device); United States v. Articles of Device, etc., 481 F.2d 434, 437 (10th Cir.1973) (galvanometer used to indicate diseased state by measuring electric current running through patient’s body constitutes device).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. 25 Cases, More Or Less, Of An Article Of Device
See, e.g., United States v. Article of Device, 731 F.2d 1253 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 249 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984) (radiation detector used to locate problem areas of body on which chiropractors will concentrate qualifies as device); United States v. Articles of Device, etc., 481 F.2d 434, 437 (10th Cir.1973) (galvanometer used to indicate diseased state by measuring electric current running through patient's body constitutes device).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. 22 Rectangular or Cylindrical Finished Devices
See e.g., United States v. An Article of Device, Toftness Radiation Detector, 731 F.2d 1253, 1256-58 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 882 , 105 S.Ct. 249 , 83 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984) (litigated enforcement proceeding in which the court specifically considered whether a certain chiropractic instrument was a device even though there was no prior administrative proceeding to “classify” the instrument as a device); United States v. An Article of Device Consisting of 1,217 Cardboard Boxes, 607 F.Supp. 990 (W.D.Mich.1985) (in considering the same allegations of misbranding and adulterating present i…
Kupferstein
v.
New York
v.
New York
No. 84-100.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1984.
Published
App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 2d Jud. Dept. Certiorari denied.