green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Christoffersen v. Washington State Air National Guard
But see Martelon v. Temple, 747 F.2d 1348, 1351 (10th Cir.1984) (by enacting section 1983, Congress did not intend to create liability on the part of military superiors for transgressions against the rights of other military personnel), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1135 , 105 S.Ct. 2675 , 86 L.Ed.2d 694 (1985).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Christoffersen v. Washington State Air National Guard
But see Martelon v. Temple, 747 F.2d 1348, 1351 (10th Cir.1984) (by enacting section 1983, Congress did not intend to create liability on the part of military superiors for transgressions against the rights of other military personnel), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1135 , 105 S.Ct. 2675 , 86 L.Ed.2d 694 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Turner v. Schultz
See Martelon v. Temple, 747 F.2d 1348, 1350-51 (10th Cir .1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1135 , 105 S.Ct. 2675 , 86 L.Ed.2d 694 (1985) (noting that while 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims are brought against state officers, equivalent actions against federal officials must be brought pursuant to Bivens).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morse v. West
See Martelon v. Temple, 747 F.2d 1348, 1349-51 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1135 , 105 S.Ct. 2675 , 86 L.Ed.2d 694 (1985) (claim of technician employed as a civilian whose employment was contingent upon membership in the National Guard was barred by Feres because it was “clearly related to military employment”); Burkins v. United States, 865 F.Supp. 1480, 1493-95, n. 13 (D.Colo.1994) (claims of AWOL soldier in National Guard were barred by Feres doctrine since the alleged injuries were sustained incident to military service, citing eases where plaintiffs were precluded from fili…
cited
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
See Carstens v. NRC, 742 F.2d 1546 , 1558 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1136 , 105 S.Ct. 2675 , 86 L.Ed.2d 694 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
See Carstens v. NRC, 742 F.2d 1546 , 1558 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1136 , 105 S.Ct. 2675 , 86 L.Ed.2d 694 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stauber v. Cline
See Martelon v. Temple, 747 F.2d 1348, 1351-52 (10th Cir.1984) (legislative history of National Guard Technicians Act, 32 U.S.C. § 709 (e), demonstrates that Congress considered military mission of technicians paramount and technicians’ duties inseparable from military obligations), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1135 , 105 S.Ct. 2675 , 86 L.Ed.2d 694 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wright v. Park
See, e.g., Jorden, 799 F.2d at 107 ; Trerice v. Summons, 755 F.2d 1081, 1084 (4th Cir.1985); Mollnow v. Carlton, 716 F.2d 627, 630 (9th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1100, 104 S.Ct. 1595 , 80 L.Ed.2d 126 (1984); see also Martelon v. Temple, 747 F.2d 1348, 1350 (10th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1135 , 105 S.Ct. 2675 , 86 L.Ed.2d 694 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spence v. Holesinger
See also, Martelon v. Temple, 747 F.2d 1348, 1350-51 (10th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 105 U.S. 2675 , 105 S.Ct. 2675 , 86 L.Ed.2d 694 (1985) (appellate court affirmed district court’s granting of summary judgment for military defendants on claims which included a prayer for reinstatement).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Western Union International, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
See, e.g., Carstens v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 742 F.2d 1546, 1553, 1557 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1136 , 105 S.Ct. 2675 , 86 L.Ed.2d 694 (1985); Telocator Network of America v. FCC, 691 F.2d 525, 538 (D.C.Cir.1982); United States v. FCC, 652 F.2d 72 , 88 (D.C.Cir.1980); see also Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight Systems, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 292-93 , 95 S.Ct. 438, 445-46 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974); cf. Board of Governors v. Investment Company Institute, 450 U.S. 46 , 56 & n. 20, 101 S.Ct. 973 , 981 & n. 20, 67 L.Ed.2d 36 (1981) (quoting Board of Governors v.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Western Union International, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Communications Satellite Corporation, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., International Relay, Inc., Trt Telecommunications Corporation, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Intervenors. Rca Global Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, International Relay, Inc., American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Hawaiian Telephone Company, Intervenors. Itt World Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, International Relay, Inc., Intervenors. Itt World Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, International Relay, Inc., Communications Satellite Corporation, Rca Global Communications, Inc., American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Aeronautical Radio, Inc., American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Sin, Inc., Dow Jones and Company, Inc., Intervenors. MCI International, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, International Relay, Inc., Communications Satellite Corporation, Rca Global Communications, Inc., American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Aeronautical Radio, Inc., Sin, Inc., Dow Jones and Company, Inc., Intervenors. Fedex International Transmission Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, International Relay, Inc., Aeronautical Radio, Inc., Sin, Inc., American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Communications Satellite Corporation, Intervenors. MCI International, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, International Relay, Inc., Aeronautical Radio, Inc., Sin, Inc., American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Communications Satellite Corporation, Intervenors
See, e.g., Carstens v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 742 F.2d 1546, 1553, 1557 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 2675 , 86 L.Ed.2d 694 (1985); Telocator Network of America v. FCC, 691 F.2d 525, 538 (D.C.Cir.1982); United States v. FCC, 652 F.2d 72 , 88 (D.C.Cir.1980); see also Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight Systems, Inc., 419 U.S. 281, 292-93 , 95 S.Ct. 438, 445-46 , 42 L.Ed.2d 447 (1974); cf. Board of Governors v. Investment Company Institute, 450 U.S. 46 , 56 & n. 20, 101 S.Ct. 973 , 981 & n. 20, 67 L.Ed.2d 36 (1981) (quoting Board of Governors v. …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cain
v.
Virginia
v.
Virginia
No. 84-1374.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 3, 1985.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.