green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.2 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[s]ome devices are so simple and their purpose and efficacy so obvious that their complete construction is sufficient to demonstrate workability”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“there must be sufficient evidence to support the award”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Paul Weldon Herd, Debtor. Rowe International, Inc. v. Paul Weldon Herd
But see In re South Atlantic Financial Corp., 767 F.2d 814, 817 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986) (Rule 3003(c)(3) must be read in conjunction with Rule 9006(b) and when a party moves for an extension of time to file after the bar date, it must prove excusable neglect.); In re Arrow Air, Inc., 75 B.R. 375, 377-78 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1987) (discussing policy reasons in favor of an excusable neglect requirement).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Asahi/America, Inc.
ome devices are so simple and their purpose and efficacy so obvious that their complete construction is sufficient to demonstrate workability
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Charles GUNBY, Jr., Appellant in 86-3707, v. PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant in 86-3723
there must be sufficient evidence to support the award
cited
Cited "see"
In re: Sharena Lareasa Taylor
See generally In re South Atlantic Financial Corp., 767 F.2d 814, 817 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986).
examined
Cited "see"
King Instruments Corporation v. Luciano Perego and Tapematic, Defendant/cross-Appellants
(4×)
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853 , 226 USPQ 402 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986) ("Otari") ( U.S. Patent No. 3,737,358 on a "shift block" splicer held invalid.). 70 The Rite-Hite court ruled that patent infringement damages under 35 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pioneer Hi-Bred International v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc.
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 863 (Fed.Cir.1985) (lost profits award “requires (1) a showing that the patent owner would have made the sale but for the infringement, i.e., causation existed, and (2) proper evidence of the computation on the loss of profits”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); but see Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, an Iowa Corporation v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Hawaiian Research, Ltd., an Iowa Corporation Corn States Hybrid Service, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, an Iowa Corporation v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Hawaiian Research, Ltd., an Iowa Corporation Corn States Hybrid Service, Inc., an Iowa Corporation
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 863 (Fed.Cir.1985) (lost profits award "requires (1) a showing that the patent owner would have made the sale but for the infringement, i.e., causation existed, and (2) proper evidence of the computation on the loss of profits"), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); but see Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros.
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlantic Thermoplastics Co., Inc., James B. Sullivan and Richard B. Fox v. Faytex Corporation
(2×)
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 859-60 , 226 USPQ 402, 406 (Fed.Cir.1985), cer t. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 [ 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 ] (1986); Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik AG v. Murata Mach., Ltd., 731 F.2d 831, 835-37 , 221 USPQ 561, 564-65 (Fed.Cir.1984); see also In re Corcoran, 640 F.2d 1331, 1333-34 , 208 USPQ 867, 870 (CCPA 1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Filmtec Corporation v. Hydranautics
See DSL Dynamic Sciences, Ltd. v. Union Switch & Signal, Inc., 928 F.2d 1122, 1126 , 18 USPQ2d 1152, 1155 (Fed.Cir.1991) (citing King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 861 , 226 USPQ 402, 407 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986)).
cited
Cited "see"
Delta-X Corporation v. Baker Hughes Production Tools, Inc., and Baker Cac, Defendants/cross-Appellants
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 866-67 , 226 USPQ 402, 411-12 , (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Ristvedt-Johnson, Inc. v. Brandt, Inc.
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 866-67 , 226 USPQ 402, 411-12 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); State Indus. v. A.O.
cited
Cited "see"
Kelsey-Hayes Co. v. Motor Wheel Corp.
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 866 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Hughes-Bechtol, Inc. v. Ohio (In Re Hughes-Bechtol, Inc.)
See generally In re South Atlantic Financial Corp., 767 F.2d 814, 817 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Eastern Systems, Inc.
See In re South Atlantic Financial Corp., 767 F.2d 814, 818 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986) (no excusable neglect where creditor’s counsel failed to determine whether proof of claim had already been filed by prior counsel); In re Gem Rail Corp., 12 B.R. 929, 932 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1981) (no excusable neglect because debtor’s failure to file statements and schedules resulted from freely chosen course of action); In re Oakton Beach & Tennis Club, 9 B.R. 201, 205 (Bankr.E.D.Wis.1981) (even if creditor failed to file proof of claim relying on mi…
cited
Cited "see"
Spalding & Evenflo Companies, Inc. v. Acushnet Co.
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re the Charter Company, Debtors. The Charter Company and Charter Oil Company v. Dioxin
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See generally In re South Atlantic Financial Corp., 767 F.2d 814, 817 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re The Charter Company
See generally In re South Atlantic Financial Corp., 767 F.2d 814, 817 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986). 9 Normally, with one enumerated exception, proofs of claim are filed individually, usually by a creditor.
cited
Cited "see"
Certified Class in the Charter Securities Litigation v. Charter Co. (In re Charter Co.)
See generally In re South Atlantic Financial Corp., 767 F.2d 814, 817 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
The Magnavox Company and Sanders Associates, Inc., Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Activision, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 867 , 226 USPQ 402, 412 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 1197 (1986); Central Soya Co. v. Geo.
discussed
Cited "see"
Roby v. Center Companies
See Erebia v. Chrysler Plastic Products Corp., 772 F.2d 1250 (6th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986); Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Co., 805 F.2d 611 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 823 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Afros S.P.A. v. Krauss-Maffei Corp.
Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., 781 F.2d 198, 201 (Fed.Cir.1986); see King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 867 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Amstar Corporation v. Envirotech Corporation
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 867 , 226 U.S.P.Q. 402, 412 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); State Indus., Inc. v. A.O.
cited
Cited "see"
Amstar Corp. v. Envirotech Corp.
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 867 , 226 U.S.P.Q. 402, 412 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); State Indus., Inc. v. A.O.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rite-Hite Corporation, Cross-Appellants v. Kelley Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 862 , 226 U.S.P.Q. 402, 408 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); Palumbo v. Don-Joy Co., 762 F.2d 969, 975 , 226 U.S.P.Q. 5, 8 (Fed.Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
King Instrument Corporation v. Otari Corporation
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853 , 226 USPQ 402 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Estate of William A. Lidbury, Deceased, Harry Lidbury, Petitioner- Cross-Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-Appellee
Id; see Pyle v. United States, 766 F.2d 1141, 1145 (7th Cir.1985), certiorari denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Ellington
Grant Co., 53 B.R. 417, 420 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1985) (emphasis added); see also In re South Atlantic Financial Corp., 767 F.2d 814, 819 (11th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986) (before court can permit amendment, something capable of amending must be filed).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Florida Department of Insurance v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc. (In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc.)
See, e.g., In re South Atlantic Financial Corp., 767 F.2d 814, 818 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Smith
See also King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 867, 226 USPQ 402, 412 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986) (defendant’s reasonable belief that its activities fell within its own patent claims, although irrelevant in an infringement analysis, is a factor in determining intent with respect to willful infringement).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Herchel Smith and American Home Products Corporation, Defendants/cross-Appellants. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories v. Johnson & Johnson Corporation
See also King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 867 , 226 USPQ 402, 412 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986) (defendant's reasonable belief that its activities fell within its own patent claims, although irrelevant in an infringement analysis, is a factor in determining intent with respect to willful infringement).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Harper
See e.g., In re South Atlantic Financial Corp., 767 F.2d 814 , 819 cert. den., Biscayne 21 Condominium, Inc. v. South Atlantic Financial Corp., 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (mere scheduling of a creditor’s claim by debtor, nor notice of an appearance of attorney for creditor does not constitute amendable informal claim); Liakas v. Creditor’s Committee of Deja VU Inc., 780 F.2d 176, 178 (1st Cir.1986) (conversations by creditor with counsel for creditor’s committee not an informal claim where there was no evidence that claimant presented any written instrument that coul…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Envirotech Corp. v. Westech Engineering, Inc.
See also King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 859-60 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); UMC Electronics, 816 F.2d at 651 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re STN Enterprises, Inc.
See also, Biscayne 21 Condominium Association, Inc. v. South Atlantic Financial Corp. (In re South Atlantic Financial Corp.), 767 F.2d 814, 817 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sun Products Group, Inc. v. B & E Sales Co., Inc.
See, e.g., King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 864 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Southtrust Bank of Alabama v. Thomas (In Re Thomas)
Compare Bankruptcy Rule 3003(c)(3) which allows the bankruptcy court in Chapter 9 and 11 cases to extend the time within which proofs of claim may be filed "for cause shown.” The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case of In re South Atlantic Financial Corp., 767 F.2d 814 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986), held that Rule 3003(c)(3) must be read in conjunction with Bankruptcy Rule 9006(b)(1), which provides that a party must show that its failure to file a claim before the court’s deadline was the result of "excusable neglect.” 3 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Larsen
See, e.g., In re South Atlantic Financial Corp. (Biscayne 21 Condominium Ass’n Inc. v. South Atlantic Financial Corp.), 767 F.2d 814, 817 (11 Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986); In re Southern Commodity Corp., 62 B.R. 4, 5 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1986); In re O.P.M.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cruz LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.B. THOMAS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
See, e.g., Erebia v. Chrysler Plastic Products Corp., 772 F.2d 1250, 1253-54 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker Oil Tools, Inc. v. Geo Vann, Inc., Baker Oil Tools, Inc. v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.
See also King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 861, 226 USPQ 402, 407 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Spindelfabrik Suessen-Schurr Stahlecker & Grill Gmbh v. Schubert & Salzer Maschinenfabrik Aktiengesellschaft and Schubert & Salzer MacHine Works, Inc.
See also King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 867 , 226 USPQ 402, 412 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert, denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Ungar
See also In re South Atlantic Financial Corp., 767 F.2d 814, 819 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Twm Manufacturing Co., Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellants v. Dura Corp. And Kidde, Inc., Appellants/cross-Appellees
See, e.g., King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 865 , 226 USPQ 402, 410-11 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); Paper Converting Machine Co., 745 F.2d at 22 , 223 USPQ at 599 (Fed.Cir. 1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BISCAYNE 21 CONDOMINIUM, INC.
v.
SOUTH ATLANTIC FINANCIAL CORP.
v.
SOUTH ATLANTIC FINANCIAL CORP.
No. 85-1056.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1986.
106 S. Ct. 1197
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1) · Federal Circuit (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Denied.