green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Black v. Goodman
See, Farkas v. New York State Dept. of Health, 554 F.Supp. 24, 27-8 (N.D.N.Y.1982), aff'd, 767 F.2d 907 (2nd Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1033 , 106 S.Ct. 596 , 88 L.Ed.2d 575 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charter International Oil Co. v. Ziegler (In Re Charter Co.)
See Matter of Penn Central Transportation Co., 42 B.R. 657, 675 (E.D.Pa.1984) (no exception for claims which were unknown to claimant until after consummation of the Plan), aff'd 771 F.2d 762 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 474 U.S. 1033 , 106 S.Ct. 596 , 88 L.Ed.2d 576 (1985); Hanson v. First Bank of South Dakota, N.A., 828 F.2d 1310, 1314-15 (8th Cir.1987) (not excusable neglect if delay was within creditor’s control by exercise of diligence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yankee Candle Co. v. New England Candle Co.
Licensing Assoc., Inc., 119 F.3d 55, 59 (1st Cir.1997); see also Motta v. Samuel Weiser, Inc., 768 F.2d 481, 484 (1st Cir.) (noting that the “determination of ownership is a conclusion of law based on underlying facts”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1033 , 106 S.Ct. 596 , 88 L.Ed.2d 575 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Selma Foundry v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.
See also, In re Penn Central Transportation Co. , 771 F.2d 762 (3rd Cir. 1985), cert. denied , 474 U.S. 1033 , 106 S.Ct. 596 , 88 L.Ed.2d 576 (1985)." Oneida Motor Freight , 848 F.2d at 417 (emphasis added).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eastover Bank for Savings v. Smith (In Re Little)
See also, In Re Penn Central Transportation Co., 771 F.2d 762 (3rd Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1033 , 106 S.Ct. 596 , 88 L.Ed.2d 576 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oneida Motor Freight, Inc., a Corporation of the State of New York v. United Jersey Bank, a Corporation Organized Under the Banking Laws of the United States of America. United Jersey Bank, a New Jersey Corporation, Defendant-Third Party v. Donald T. Singleton, Third Party in Re Oneida Motor Freight, Inc., Debtor, B.C. 85-03606(dv)
See also, In Re Penn Central Transportation Co., 771 F.2d 762 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1033 , 106 S.Ct. 596 , 88 L.Ed.2d 576 (1985). 26 Disclosure is important, in this case, not only to the bank as an adversary and as a creditor, but to the other creditors and to the bankruptcy court.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey Bank
See also, In Re Penn Central Transportation Co., 771 F.2d 762 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1033 , 106 S.Ct. 596 , 88 L.Ed.2d 576 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PINNEY DOCK & TRANSPORT COMPANY
v.
PERN CENTRAL CORPORATION
v.
PERN CENTRAL CORPORATION
No. 85-737.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 1985.
106 S. Ct. 596
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Denied.