green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.5 score
“an accused . . . may not use his constitutional right to counsel so as to manipulate the commencement of his trial to suit his convenience and pleasure.”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brandon Islas v. State
an accused ... may not use his constitutional right to counsel so as to manipulate the commencement of his trial to suit his convenience and pleasure.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nathan Hodges v. State
an accused . . . may not use his constitutional right to counsel so as to manipulate the commencement of his trial to suit his convenience and pleasure.
cited
Cited "see"
Durham v. State
See Neal v. State, 689 S.W.2d 420, 428 (Tex.Cr.App.1984), cer t. denied., 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 65 , 88 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Geronimo Muniz-Melchor
See id. at 2330 This Court has indicated in dicta that a "more likely than not" standard (from the perspective of a reasonable officer) is applicable, see United States v. Tinkle, 655 F.2d 617, 622-23 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 924 , 102 S.Ct. 1285 , 71 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982), as well as some level of assurance less than that, see United States v. Antone, 753 F.2d 1301, 1304 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 64 , 88 L.Ed.2d 52 and 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 65 , 88 L.Ed.2d 52 (1985); United States v. Adcock, 756 F.2d 346, 347 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1102 , 105…
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control v. Monsanto Company Allied Corporation E.M. Industries, Inc. Defendants- American Insurance Association Chemical Manufacturers Association Amici Curiae. And South Carolina Recycling and Disposal, Inc. Columbia Organic Chemical Company Oscar Seidenberg Harvey Hutchinson Eaton Corporation Rad Services, Inc. Aquair Corporation v. G.D. Searle & Company Will Ross, Inc., Third Party United States of America South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control v. Oscar Seidenberg Harvey Hutchinson American Insurance Association Chemical Manufacturers Association, Amici Curiae. And Monsanto Company Allied Corporation Aquair Corporation E.M. Industries, Inc. South Carolina Recycling and Disposal, Inc. Columbia Organic Chemical Company Eaton Corporation Rad Services, Inc. v. G.D. Searle & Company Will Ross, Inc., Third Party United States of America and South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control v. Monsanto Company Allied Corporation E.M. Industries Inc. South Carolina Recycling and Disposal, Inc. Oscar Seidenberg Harvey Hutchinson American Insurance Association Chemical Manufacturers Association, Amici Curiae. And Columbia Organic Chemical Company Eaton Corporation Rad Services, Inc. Aquair Corporation v. G.D. Searle & Company Will Ross, Inc., Third Party
Id. at 711 , 94 S.Ct. at 2016 ; see Nilson Van & Storage Co. v. Marsh, 755 F.2d 362, 365 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 65 , 88 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Monsanto Co.
Id. at 711 , 94 S.Ct. at 2016 ; see Nilson Van & Storage Co. v. Marsh, 755 F.2d 362, 365 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 65 , 88 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Lee Baker
See Nilson Van & Storage v. Marsh, 755 F.2d 362 , 367 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 65 (1985)
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Shaffer
See also Nilson Van & Storage, 755 F.2d 362, 364-65 , (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 65 , 88 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985); United States v. Draper, 762 F.2d 81, 82 (10th Cir.1985) (citing with approval Nilson Van Storage as the basis for its earlier order which allowed the government to invoke the new provision of section 3731 as the basis for appealing a district court order of October 24, 1984 granting a new trial). 5 B.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WACO Financial, Inc.
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
No. 84-1770.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Texas (2)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.