green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Kepiro, 06ap-1302 (9-6-2007)
See Cokeley v. State (1986), 288 Ark. 349 , 350-352 , certiorari denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 195 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zertuche-Tobias
See and compare United States v. Rojas, 783 F.2d 105, 108 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 195 , 93 L.Ed.2d 127 (1986) (four officers with guns drawn and pointed at defendants at close range for several minutes each held to be “no unnecessary display of weapons,” and consent found to be freely and voluntarily given). 78 The Court concludes, based on all the circumstances presented, that Zertuche was not “seized” until after he had given voluntary consent to search the house and the cocaine had been found. 79 The encounter between Zertuche and the officers was not conv…
cited
Cited "see"
David Stephens v. Larry Norris
See Cokeley v. State, 705 S.W.2d 425 (Ark.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
David Stephens v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
See Cokeley v. State, 288 Ark. 349 , 705 S.W.2d 425 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 195 , 93 L.Ed.2d 127 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Holland v. State
See McCall v. State , 487 So.2d 1375 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 195 , 93 L.Ed.2d 127 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Debra A. Hartmann, Kenneth K. Kaenel, and John Scott Korabik
See United States v. Allen, 797 F.2d 1395, 1402 (7th Cir.) (each mailing or use of wire com *793 munications under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343 constitute separate offenses), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 196 , 93 L.Ed.2d 128 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dickie Cokeley v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
(2×)
See Cokeley v. State, 288 Ark. 349 , 705 S.W.2d 425 , cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 195 , 93 L.Ed.2d 127 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Segun Ashimi
See United States v. Rojas, 783 F.2d 105, 107 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 195 , 93 L.Ed.2d 127 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gans
See United States v. Deland, 22 MJ 70, 72 (CMA), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 196 , 93 L.Ed.2d 128 (1986), citing United States v. LeMere, 22 MJ 61 (CMA 1986); see also California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149 , 90 S.Ct.1930, 26 L.Ed.2d 489 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fink
See United States v. Deland, 22 M.J. 70, 72 (C.M.A.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 196 , 93 L.Ed.2d 128 (1986); United States v. LeMere, 22 M.J. 61, 69 (C.M.A.1986), citing California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149 , 90 S.Ct. 1930 , 26 L.Ed.2d 489 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert F. Beckman v. United States
See United States v. Allen, 797 F.2d 1395, 1402 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 (1986); United States v. Lupino, 480 F.2d 720, 724 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 924 (1973). 5 Finally, Beckman argued that counts two through forty-three also violated the rule against multiplicity because they charged the same offenses.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Kuzniar and George Pistas
(2×)
See United States v. Allen, 797 F.2d 1395, 1399 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 196 , 93 L.Ed.2d 128 (1986); United States v. Noble, 754 F.2d 1324, 1332 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tornowski
See generally, United States v. Deland, 22 M.J. 70, 75 (C.M.A.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 196 , 93 L.Ed.2d 128 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Freddie D. Montgomery v. United States
See United States v. Allen, 797 F.2d 1395, 1402 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 (1986); United States v. Lupino, 480 F.2d 720, 724 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 924 (1973). 4 We also find no error in the government charging two crimes in count one of the indictment (namely, conspiracy to steal cars and transport them in interstate commerce, and conspiracy to rob banks).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arthur Franklin v. United States
See United States v. Allen, 797 F.2d 1395, 1402 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 (1986); United States v. Lupino, 480 F.2d 720, 724 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 924 (1973). 9 Franklin also alleged that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because counsel did not inform him that the maximum penalty under 21 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Castellon v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Rojas, 783 F.2d 105, 109-10 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 195 , 93 L.Ed.2d 127 (1986) (although defendant was in custody, handcuffed, and had a slight language barrier, the presence of such “subtly coercive” factors was outweighed by the fact that defendant was of sufficient age and intellect and no direct force or intimidation was used).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donnie Strothers, United States of America v. William Hoyle
(2×)
See also United States v. Allen, 797 F.2d 1395, 1399-1400 (7th Cir.) (holding variance between anti-deadlock instruction given and instruction approved in Silvern was too insignificant to constitute [ 316 U.S.App.D.C. 220 ] plain error), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 196 , 93 L.Ed.2d 128 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edward M. Dean v. Veterans Administration Regional Office
(2×)
See also King v. Dole, 782 F.2d 274 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 194 , 93 L.Ed.2d 126 (holding that § 7703(b)(2) is jurisdictional); Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390 (9th Cir.1986) (per curiam) 1 (jurisdictional); Taylor v. Tisch, 686 F.Supp. 304 (S.D.Fla.1988) (jurisdictional). 2 Dean contends that in Irwin v. Veterans Administration, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 453 , 112 L.Ed.2d 435 (1990), the Supreme Court overruled Hilliard by implication.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tu
See, e.g., United States v. Deland, 16 M.J. 889, 893 (A.C.M.R.1983), affirmed in part reversed in part, 22 M.J. 70 (C.M.A.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 856 , 107 S.Ct. 196 , 93 L.Ed.2d 128 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William L. Mondy v. Secretary of the Army
(2×)
See, e.g., King v. Dole, 782 F.2d 274 , 277 n. 3, (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 107 S.Ct. 194 , 93 L.Ed.2d 126 (1986) (Hofer held the 30-day limit for filing claims in district court jurisdictional); Bethel v. Jefferson, 589 F.2d 631 , 641 n. 64 (D.C.Cir.1978) (describing Hofer's "jurisdictional" language as dictum); Loe v. Heckler, 768 F.2d 409 , 419 n. 20 (D.C.Cir.1985) (commenting that the 30-day time limit issue is an open question).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
King
v.
Dole, Secretary of Transportation
v.
Dole, Secretary of Transportation
No. 86-5004.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1986.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.