green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
“the critical inquiry under the independent source doctrine is whether the challenged evidence was obtained from lawful sources and by lawful means independent of the police misconduct.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Holland
the critical inquiry under the independent source doctrine is whether the challenged evidence was obtained from lawful sources and by lawful means independent of the police misconduct.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Davis
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Kimberlin, 805 F.2d 210 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1023 , 107 S.Ct. 3270 , 97 L.Ed.2d 768 (1987); Brown v. United States, 384 F.Supp. 1151 (E.D.Mich.1974), rev’d on other grounds, 557 F.2d 541 (6th Cir.1977). 32 So while the government’s argument in this case has never been accepted by another court, neither has it been rejected.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Noah Ryan Robinson and John Anthony Robinson, and Noah Robinson v. United States of America, and John A. Robinson v. United States
See United States v. Kimberlin, 805 F.2d 210, 234 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1023 , 107 S.Ct. 3270 , 97 L.Ed.2d 768 (1987); United States v. Fountain, 768 F.2d 790, 795 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1124, 106 S.Ct. 1647 , 90 L.Ed.2d 191 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lahr v. State
See United States v. Kimberlin (1986), 7th Cir., 805 F.2d 210 cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1023 , 107 S.Ct. 3270 , 97 L.Ed.2d 768 (1987) (for Barker purposes the court separately considered the lapse of time before the first trial and the lapse of time from the first trial to the retrial).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hughes
See United States v. Kimberlin, 805 F.2d 210, 228 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1023 , 107 S.Ct. 3270 , 97 L.Ed.2d 768 (1987). ’ In light of the discussion in Malin , this court finds that Walton’s abovementioned assertions are not viable.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael J. Newman
See United States v. Kimberlin, 805 F.2d 210, 244 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1023 , 107 S.Ct. 3270 , 97 L.Ed.2d 768 (1987) (no error where court brought to attention of counsel that a juror appeared to be sleeping, but neither side requested juror replacement).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Darryl Glenn Malin
See United States v. Kimberlin, 805 F.2d 210, 228 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1023 , 107 S.Ct. 3270 , 97 L.Ed.2d 768 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert A. Hawley, United States of America v. Audrey J. Hawley
See generally Hamilton v. Nix, 809 F.2d 463, 464-67 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 3270 , 97 L.Ed.2d 768 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Claudia A. Ford
See United States v. Kimberlin, 805 F.2d 210, 244 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 3270 , 97 L.Ed.2d 768 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kent Thomas L'ALLier
See United States v. Kimberlin, 805 F.2d 210, 227 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 3270 , 97 L.Ed.2d 768 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lam Luong v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Kimberlin, 805 F.2d 210, 233 (7th Cir.1986) (refusing to find a due process violation where a witness had not been shown a picture of the defendant by a government agent, but rather had seen it on television), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1023 , 107 S.Ct. 3270 , 97 L.Ed.2d 768 (1987); United States v. Zeiler, 470 F.2d 717, 720 (3d Cir.1972) (refusing to find the identification suggestive and viola-tive of due process, reasoning that when ‘there is no evidence that law enforcement officials encouraged or assisted in impermissiv.e [sic] identification procedures, the prop…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eric B. Reinholz Margaret E. Chevalier
United States v. Dickson, 64 F.3d 409, 410 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1064 , 116 S.Ct. 747 , 133 L.Ed.2d 695 (1996); see also Hamilton v. Nix, 809 F.2d 463, 465-66 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1023 , 107 S.Ct. 3270 , 97 L.Ed.2d 768 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Kimberlin, 527 F.Supp. 1010 (S.D.Ind.1981) (where juror notes disposed of prior to deliberations, no prejudice shown), aff'd, 805 F.2d 210 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1023 , 107 S.Ct. 3270 , 97 L.Ed.2d 768 (1987); White v. State, 552 P.2d 1161 (Okla.Crim.App.1976) (no prejudice where juror notes not used in jury deliberations); Bakhit v. Thomsen, 193 Neb. 133 , 225 N.W.2d 860 (1975) (although note-taking generally frowned upon, no prejudice where no showing that notes used in jury room); State v. Emrick, 129 Vt. 475 , 282 A.2d 821 (1971) (note-taking not …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William J. Ashford
(2×)
In analyzing a Sixth Amendment speedy trial claim, we apply the four-factor test set out in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), looking to the "[l]ength of delay, the reason for the delay, the defendant's assertion of his right, and prejudice to the defendant." Id. at 530 , 92 S.Ct. at 2191-92; see, e.g., United States v. Kimberlin, 805 F.2d 210, 225 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1023 , 107 S.Ct. 3270 , 97 L.Ed.2d 768 (1987); United States v. Brock, 782 F.2d 1442, 1445 (7th Cir.1986); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Thompson v. Dale Foltz
See, e.g., United States v. Kimberlin, 805 F.2d 210, 220 (7th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 107 S.Ct. 3270 (1987); United States v. Brack, 747 F.2d 1142, 1148 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1216 (1985); United States v. Gulledge, 739 F.2d 582, 584 (11th Cir.1984). 15 Given that the Supreme Court's decision in Jackson pertains only to convictions obtained on the basis of legally insufficient evidence, and given the interpretations of Jackson and Richardson in the above-cited circuit court decisions, we find that Thompson was not entitled under the Due Process Clause to state appellate review…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Freeman
v.
Hartigan, Attorney General of Illinois
v.
Hartigan, Attorney General of Illinois
No. 86-6826.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 26, 1987.
Published
Citer courts: D. Maryland (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.